Complications after reconstructive plastic surgery using allomaterials in patients with breast cancer according to domestic and world literature

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

   Aim of this work is to review the current literature on the study and evaluation of surgical complications after reconstructive plastic surgery in patients with breast cancer.

   The search for relevant sources was carried out in PubMed, Cochrane Library, E-library systems, publications from 2013 to 2022 were studied, 38 of which were used to write this review. There is no doubt that the development of complications during reconstructive plastic surgery can affect the quality of life of patients, despite attempts to eliminate them. Therefore, a more detailed study of the nature, causes, and ways to eliminate complications will allow oncologists and plastic surgeons to correctly assess the disadvantages and advantages of various methods of surgical treatment of breast cancer, and, accordingly, to conduct a personalized approach when choosing the volume of surgical treatment. Based on the analyzed world and domestic literature, it was found that the choice of breast reconstruction technique should be determined separately for each clinical case. The risks, advantages and disadvantages of each technique must be taken into account and considered for each individual clinical situation.

About the authors

E. A. Troshenkov

P. Hertzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiology Center, Ministry of Health of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: 7783949@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2136-5028

Evgeniy Alekseevich Troshenkov

125284

3 2-oy Botkinskiy Proezd

Moscow

Russian Federation

A. D. Zikiryakhodzhaev

P. Hertzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiology Center, Ministry of Health of Russia; I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University),
Ministry of Health of Russia; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7141-2502

125284

3 2-oy Botkinskiy Proezd

119048

Build. 2, 8 Trubetskaya St.

117198

6 Miklukho-Maklaya St.

Moscow

Russian Federation

A. D. Kaprin

P. Hertzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiology Center, Ministry of Health of Russia; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8784-8415

125284

3 2-oy Botkinskiy Proezd

117198

6 Miklukho-Maklaya St.

Moscow

Russian Federation

D. S. Malik

A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiology Center, Ministry of Health of Russia

249036

4 Koroleva St.

Obninsk

Russian Federation

References

  1. Bertozzi N. One-stage immediate breast reconstruction: a concise review. Bio Med Res Int 2017. doi: 10.1155/2017/6486859
  2. Cirier J. Impact of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive breast cancer according to molecular subtype. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol 2017; 10 (45): 535–44. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2017.08.002
  3. Foster R. S., Farwell M. E., Costanza M. C. Breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer: Patterns of care in a geographic region and estimation of potential applicability. Ann Surg Oncol 1995;3(2):275–80. doi: 10.1007/BF02307035
  4. Huang Y., Sanz J., Rodríguez N. et al. Effects of radiation on toxicity, complications, revision surgery and aesthetic outcomes in breast reconstruction: An argument about timing and techniques. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 12 (74): 3316–23. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.05.027
  5. Kobraei E. M., Cauley R., Gadd M. et al. Avoiding breast animation deformity with pectoralis-sparing subcutaneous direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016; 5 (4): 1–5. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000681
  6. Alderman A.K. Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the Michigan breast reconstruction outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 109 (7): 2265–74. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200206000-00015
  7. Fisher B. Transmigration of lymph node by tumor cells. Science 1966; 152 (727): 1397, 1398. doi: 10.1126/science.152.3727.1397
  8. Laporta R. Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: clinical outcomes and risk factors related complications. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2017; 6 (51): 427–35. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2017.1303500
  9. Wilkins E. G. Complications in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction. Ann Surg 2018; 1 (267): 164–70. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002033
  10. Barnea Y. Oncoplastic reduction using the vertical scar superior-medial pedicle pattern technique for immediate partial breast reconstruction. Canad J Surg 2014; 4 (57). doi: 10.1503/cjs.031213
  11. Jagsi R. Impact of radiotherapy on complications and patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstruction. J Nat Cancer Inst 2018; 2 (110): 157–65. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx148
  12. Srinivasa D. R. Obesity and breast reconstruction: complications and patient-reported outcomes in a multicenter, prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 3 (145): 481e–490e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006543
  13. Adamson K. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not increase complications in oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 9 (26): 2730–7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07408-6
  14. Arslanov K. S. Remedial surgery and possible complications after reconstructive plastic interventions into the breast. Onkologiya. Zhurnal im. P. A. Gertsena 2015; 4 (4): 12.
  15. Eaton B. R. Local recurrence patterns in breast cancer patients treated with oncoplastic reduction mammaplasty and radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 1 (21): 93–9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3235-8
  16. Lee C.-C. Long-term complications and patient-reported outcomes after alloplastic breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2022; 1 (88): S78–S84. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003114
  17. Haloua M. H. A systematic review of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: Current weaknesses and future prospects. Ann Surg 2013; 4 (257): 609–20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182888782
  18. Yun J. H., Diaz R., Orman A. G. Breast reconstruction and radiation therapy. Cancer Control 2018; 1 (25): 1–7. doi: 10.1177/1073274818795489
  19. Rella L. MRI evaluation of post-mastectomy irradiated breast implants: Prevalence and analysis of complications. Clin Radiol 2015; 9 (70): 948–53. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.04.018
  20. Roostaeian J. Immediate placement of implants in breast reconstruction: Patient selection and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 4 (127): 1407–16. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318208d0ea
  21. Hansson E. First-year complications after immediate breast reconstruction with a biological and a synthetic mesh in the same patient: а randomized controlled study. J Surg Oncol 2021; 1 (123): 80–8. doi: 10.1002/jso.26227
  22. Saheb-Al-Zamani M. Early postoperative complications from national surgical quality improvement program. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 3 (86): S159–S164. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002590
  23. Razavi S. A., Hart A. L., Carlson G. W. Ischemic complications after bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy and implant-based reconstruction: a critical analysis. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 86 (6S Suppl 5): S526–S531. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002703
  24. Sugawara E., Nikaido H. Properties of AdeABC and AdeIJK efflux systems of Acinetobacter baumannii compared with those of the AcrAB-TolC system of Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014; 12 (58): 7250–7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03728-14
  25. Zikiryakhodzhaev A. D. Complications of delayed reconstructive plastic surgery after radical mastectomy. Opukholi zhenskoy reproduktivnoy sistemy = Tumors of the female reproductive system 2015; (2): 31–4. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17650/1994-4098-2015-11-2-31-34
  26. Khodorovich O. S., Kalinina-Masri A. A., Kanakhina L. B. et al. Reconstructive plastic surgery using an expander / implant and radiation therapy for breast cancer. Vestnik Rossiyskogo nauchnogo tsentra rentgenoradiologii = Bulletin of the Russian Scientific Center for Radiation Radiology 2020; 1 (20): 1–14. (In Russ.)
  27. Larionov D. P., Zikiryakhodzhaev A. D., Rasskazova E. A. Capsular contracture as a complication of breast arthroplasty after reconstructive plastic surgery for breast cancer. Vrach = Doctor 2020: 44–9. (In Russ.). doi: 10.29296/25877305-2020-11-08
  28. Vlasova M. Yu., Zikiryakhodhaev A. D. Complications after onestage prepectoral reconstruction with polyurethane-coated implants in breast cancer. Opukholi zhenskoy reptoduktivnoy sistemy = Tumors of the female reproductive system 2020 (16): 12–20. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17650/1994-4098-2020-16-4-12-20
  29. Colwell A. S. Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: Predictors of complications, reconstruction outcomes, and 5-year trends. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 3 (133): 496–506. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000438056.67375.75
  30. Kim S. Y., Bang S. I. Impact of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) use under mastectomy flap necrosis on perioperative outcomes of prosthetic breast reconstruction. Aesthet Plast Surg 2017; 2 (41): 275–81. doi: 10.1007/s00266-017-0794-2
  31. Hillberg N. S. Delay of adjuvant radiotherapy due to postoperative complications after oncoplastic breast conserving surgery. Breast 2018; (39): 110–6. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.04.005
  32. Vidya R. Rippling associated with pre-pectoral implant based breast reconstruction: a new grading system. World J Plast Surg 2019; 3 (8): 311–5. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336651225_Rippling_Associated_with_Pre-Pectoral_Implant_Based_Breast_Reconstruction_A_New_Grading_System
  33. Banuelos J. Microbiology of implant-based breast reconstruction infections: a systematic review. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 2 (85): 194–201. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001974
  34. Bennett K. G. Comparison of 2-year complication rates among common techniques for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg 2018; 10 (153): 901–8. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1687
  35. Gschwantler-Kaulich D. Mesh versus acellular dermal matrix in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction – а prospective randomized trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 5 (42): 665–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.02.007

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c)


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 36991 от  21.07.2009.