Feasibility of preoperative verification of the sentinel lymph node in patients with breast cancer

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Aim. To determine the diagnostic performance and assess the feasibility of verification of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) detected by contrast-enhanced ultrasound in breast cancer patients at the outpatient (preoperative) stage.

Materials and methods. The study included 119 patients with primary breast cancer at stages 0–IIIa (cTis–3N0–1M0). The mean age was 53.0 ± 13.3 years. SLN detection was performed using contrast-enhanced ultrasound with Sonovue (Bracco Swiss SA, Switzerland), administered intradermally in the para-areolar region in a volume of 1 ml. SLN detection was carried out on a Resona 9 diagnostic ultrasound system (Mindray, China) with a linear L14–5WU transducer. Morphological verification was performed using in vivo histological and cytological examinations. Cytological assessment was carried out using the conventional method and a liquid-based technique. Morphological evaluations were performed using a light microscope.

Results. The highest informative value for verification of metastatic involvement of the SLN was demonstrated by the combination of cytological and histological examination: sensitivity – 75.8 % (95 % confidence interval 58.2–88.0 %), accuracy – 92.4 % (95 % confidence interval 86.2–96.0 %), negative predictive value – 91.5 % (95 % confidence interval 84.0–95.7 %). Cytological verification using conventional and liquid-based technologies showed sensitivities of 69.7 % and 63.6 %, respectively, with an accuracy of 92.4 % in both cases. Combining cytological techniques increased sensitivity to 72.7 %, specificity to ~99 %, and positive predictive value to 96 %. Histological verification was inferior to cytology in terms of sensitivity (51.6 %) while maintaining comparable specificity. The diagnostic performance of all morphological techniques clearly depended on the size and type of metastasis: with a combined approach, sensitivity for macrometastases reached 83 %, whereas for micrometastases it decreased to 50 %. The negative predictive value of verification at the outpatient stage ranged from 85 % to 92 %.

Conclusion. For preoperative verification and determination of SLN status in breast cancer patients, it is preferable to use combined biopsy approaches to obtain material for both histological and cytological examination, particularly in patients with moderate and high risk of metastasis, which increases the likelihood of detecting metastases by 10–25 %.

About the authors

Yuriy V. Bikeev

V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: yu_bikeev@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-3757-5025
Russian Federation, 4 Akademika Oparina St., Moscow 117198

M. V. Rodionova

V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: yu_bikeev@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1540-5644
Russian Federation, 4 Akademika Oparina St., Moscow 117198

V. V. Kometova

V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: yu_bikeev@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9666-6875
Russian Federation, 4 Akademika Oparina St., Moscow 117198

A. A. Kireev

V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia; Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: yu_bikeev@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1366-7504
Russian Federation, 4 Akademika Oparina St., Moscow 117198; Build. 1, 2 / 1 Barrikadnaya St., Moscow 125993

A. N. Sencha

V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia; N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: yu_bikeev@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-1597-1920
Russian Federation, 4 Akademika Oparina St., Moscow 117198; 1 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117513

V. V. Rodionov

V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: yu_bikeev@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4589-3645
Russian Federation, 4 Akademika Oparina St., Moscow 117198

I. V. Kolyadina

V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia; Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: yu_bikeev@oparina4.ru
Russian Federation, 4 Akademika Oparina St., Moscow 117198; Build. 1, 2 / 1 Barrikadnaya St., Moscow 125993

References

  1. Shomova M.V., Kulikov E.P., Demko A.N. et al. Possibilities of using domestic developments to assess sentinel lymph node damage in breast cancer. Opukholi zhenskoy reproduktivnoy sistemy = Tumors of Female Reproductive System 2024;20(1):39–51. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17650/1994-4098-2024-20-1-39-51
  2. De Gournay E., Guyomard A., Coutant C. et al. Impact of sentinel node biopsy on long-term quality of life in breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 2013;109(11):2783–91. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.658
  3. Zhang F., Zhang J., Meng Q.X. et al. Ultrasound combined with fine needle aspiration cytology for the assessment of axillary lymph nodes in patients with early stage breast cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97(7):e9855. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009855
  4. Kolyadina I.V., Danzanova T.Yu., Khokhlova S.V. et al. A modern view on the issues of diagnosis and verification of axillary lymph node lesions in early breast cancer. Sovremennaya onkologiya = Modern Oncology 2020; 22(1):22–8. (In Russ.). doi: 10.26442/18151434.2020.1.200018
  5. Giuliano A.E., Ballman K.V., McCall L. et al. Effect of axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection on 10-year overall survival among women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: The ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017;318(10):918–26. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11470
  6. Zhang Q., Agyekum E.A., Zhu L. et al. Clinical value of three combined ultrasonography modalities in predicting the risk of metastasis to axillary lymph nodes in breast invasive ductal carcinoma. Front Oncol 2021;11:715097. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.715097
  7. Cui Q., Dai L., Li J. et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer: a prospective cohort study. World J Surg Oncol 2023;21(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03024-7
  8. Yuan X.W., Cao C.L., Li W.X. et al. Diagnostic value of different contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) methods for sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with breast neoplasms: a meta-analysis and indirect comparison. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2025;15(6):5660–73. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-317
  9. Pang W., Zhou F., Zhu Y. et al. The value of percutaneous contrast-enhanced ultrasound in sentinel lymph node identification, metastatic status and burden diagnosis in early breast cancer. J Ultrasound Med 2024;43(2):293–303. doi: 10.1002/jum.16359
  10. Balasubramanian I., Fleming C.A., Corrigan M.A. et al. Meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy in diagnosing axillary lymph node metastasis. Br J Surg 2018;105(10):1244–53. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10920
  11. Mahmoud O.M., Khedrawy M.E.M., Megally .I. et al. Fine-needle aspiration cytology versus core needle lymph node biopsy in axillary staging of breast cancer. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 2022;53:219. doi: 10.1186/s43055-022-00895-w
  12. Pyo J.S., Jung J., Lee S.G. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology and core-needle biopsy in the assessment of the axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer-a meta-analysis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020;10(9):717. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10090717
  13. Shahab J., Ahuja S., Singh M. et al. Comparison of liquid based cytology and conventional smears on lymph node aspirates: a cytomorphological study. Cytojournal 2024;21:7. doi: 10.25259/Cytojournal_22_2023
  14. Yamashiro K., Taira K., Nakajima M. et al. Tissue rinse liquid-based cytology: a feasible tool for the intraoperative pathological evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. Cytopathology 2012;23(4):263–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2011.00872.x
  15. Iwamoto N., Aruga T., Asami H. et al. False-negative ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. Cytopathology 2020;31(5):463–7. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12877
  16. Rogers C., Zeien S., Puccetti K. et al. Examining the false-negative rate of a negative axillary node ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy in breast cancer patients undergoing upfront surgery. Am J Surg 2025;239:116047. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116047
  17. Cox K., Taylor-Phillips S., Sharma N. et al. Enhanced pre-operative axillary staging using intradermal microbubbles and contrast-enhanced ultrasound to detect and biopsy sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer: a potential replacement for axillary surgery. Br J Radiol 2018;91:20170626. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170626
  18. Sever A.R., Mills P., Weeks J. et al. Preoperative needle biopsy of sentinel lymph nodes using intradermal microbubbles and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in patients with breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199(2):465–70. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7702
  19. Zhong J., Sun D.S., Wei W. et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. Ultrasound Med Biol 2018;44(7):1371–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.03.005
  20. Chudobinski C., Kołacinska A., Gottwald L. et al. Small nodes big problem ln-rads classification structure reporting for lymph nodes. Clin Oncol 2024;9:2054.
  21. Chudobiński C., Pasicz K., Hanke M. et al. Lymph node reporting and data system (LN-RADS)-retrospective evaluation for ultrasound classification of superficial lymph nodes. Cancers (Basel) 2025;17(12):2030. doi: 10.3390/cancers17122030
  22. Ahuja S., Yadav P., Fattahi-Darghlou M. et al. Comparison of intraoperative imprint cytology versus frozen section for sentinel lymph node evaluation in breast cancer. A study along with systematic review and meta-analysis of literature. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2024;25(4):1113–9. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.4.1113
  23. Celebioglu F., Sylvan M., Perbeck L. et al. Intraoperative sentinel lymph node examination by frozen section, immunohistochemistry and imprint cytology during breast surgery--a prospective study. Eur J Cancer 2006;42(5):617–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.12.003
  24. Alkuwari E., Auger M. Accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients: a study of 115 cases with cytologic-histologic correlation. Cancer 2008;114(2):89–93. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23344
  25. Galimberti V., Cole B.F., Zurrida S. et al. Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2013;14(4):297–305. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70035-4
  26. Lyman G.H, Somerfield M.R., Giuliano A.E. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: 2016 american society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update summary. J Oncol Pract 2017;13(3):196–8. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.019992
  27. Van der Noordaa M.E.M., Vrancken Peeters M.T.F.D., Rutgers E.J.T. The intraoperative assessment of sentinel nodes – standards and controversies. Breast 2017;34(Suppl 1):S64–9. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.06.031

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2026 ABV-Press

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 36991 от  21.07.2009.