Prognostic significance of ascites, the presence of tumor cells in ascitic fluid, and the state of the tumor capsule in early ovarian cancer: a retrospective analysis
- Authors: Abduragimova Z.T.1, Kulikova S.E.1, Selchuk V.Y.2, Grebennikova O.P.2, Мaslennikova А.V.3, Nechushkina V.M.3,4
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow City Cancer Hospital No. 62, Moscow Healthcare Department
- Russian University of Medicine, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Scientific and Educational Center “Eurasian Oncology Program”
- Issue: Vol 22, No 1 (2026)
- Pages: 53-60
- Section: GYNECOLOGY. ORIGINAL REPORTS
- Published: 02.07.2026
- URL: https://ojrs.abvpress.ru/ojrs/article/view/1474
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2026-22-1-53-60
- ID: 1474
Cite item
Abstract
Background. Ovarian cancer (OC) has a high mortality rate, which makes the study of prognostic factors at early stages relevant. Intraoperative tumor capsule rupture and the presence of tumor cells in ascites / peritoneal washings are considered potentially significant outcome predictors.
Aim. To evaluate the impact of tumor capsule rupture, ascites, and tumor cells in peritoneal fluid on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with stage I–II OC.
Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of data from 209 patients with stage I–II OC (FIGO, 2016) treated between 1990 and 2019 was conducted. Tumor capsule rupture was detected in 67 (32.0 %) patients, ascites – in 25 (12.0 %) patients. Cytological examination of ascitic fluid or peritoneal washings was performed in 80 patients; tumor cells were found in 29 (36.3 %) of them. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression.
Results. Tumor capsule rupture was associated with a statistically significant decrease in survival rates: 5-year OS was 66.8 % vs. 87.6 % (p = 0.032), and 5-year PFS was 53.1 % vs. 73.4 % (p = 0.037) in groups with and without tumor capsule rupture, respectively. The hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 0.61 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.39–0.96). The presence of ascites did not show a significant effect on OS (HR 1.11; 95 % CI 0.70–1.77) and PFS (HR 0.96; 95 % CI 0.65–1.42). The detection of tumor cells in peritoneal fluid significantly worsened PFS: 5-year PFS was 63.1 % vs. 85.7 % (p = 0.020) in case of their presence and absence, respectively (HR 2.49; 95 % CI 0.86–7.21).
Conclusion. Tumor capsule rupture and the presence of tumor cells in ascitic fluid / peritoneal washings are significant adverse prognostic factors in patients with stage I–II OC. The obtained data emphasize the importance of a careful surgical approach to prevent tumor capsule rupture and the necessity of a thorough cytological examination of ascitic fluid and peritoneal washings to determine the risk of death and progression in stage I–II OC.
About the authors
Zarema T. Abduragimova
Moscow City Cancer Hospital No. 62, Moscow Healthcare Department
Author for correspondence.
Email: zarremsa@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, 27 Istra Settlement, Moscow Region 143423
S. E. Kulikova
Moscow City Cancer Hospital No. 62, Moscow Healthcare Department
Email: zarremsa@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, 27 Istra Settlement, Moscow Region 143423
V. Yu. Selchuk
Russian University of Medicine, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: zarremsa@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, 4 Dolgorukovskaya St., Moscow 127006
O. P. Grebennikova
Russian University of Medicine, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: zarremsa@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, 4 Dolgorukovskaya St., Moscow 127006
А. V. Мaslennikova
Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: zarremsa@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, 10 / 1 Ploshchad Minina i Pozharskogo, Nizhny Novgorod 603950
V. M. Nechushkina
Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia; Scientific and Educational Center “Eurasian Oncology Program”
Email: zarremsa@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1855-9692
Russian Federation, 10 / 1 Ploshchad Minina i Pozharskogo, Nizhny Novgorod 603950; Build. 1, 1 Volokolamskoe Shosse, Moscow 125080
References
- Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Wagle N.S., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. Cancer J Clin 2023;73(1):17–48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763
- Petrova A., Ivanova S., Smirnov K. et al. Surgical outcomes and capsule integrity in early ovarian cancer: multicenter study. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2024;51:101345.
- Zhang L., Smith A., Johnson B. et al. Long-term outcomes in early ovarian cancer: a multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 2023;41(15):2789–801.
- ESGO Guidelines Committee. ESGO–ESMO–ESP consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology and early, advanced and recurrent disease. Ann Oncol 2024;35(3):248–66. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.015
- Nechushkina V.M., Morkhov K.Yu., Abdurahimova Z.T. et al. Surgical treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer. Sovremennaya onkologiya = Modern Oncology 2018;20(2):61–5. (In Russ.).
- Ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. Clinical guidelines. Ed. by S.A. Tyulyanin, L.A. Kolomiets, K.Yu. Morkhov et al. Moscow: RUSSCO, 2023. 56 p. (In Russ.).
- FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. FIGO staging system for ovarian cancer: 2021 revision. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2021;155(Suppl 1):45–56.
- Vergote I., Tropé C.G., Amant F. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. New Engl J Med 2010;363(10):943–53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908806
- Shim S.H., Lee S.J., Kim S.O. et al. Prevalence and prognostic significance of asymptomatic ascites in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2016;142(3):539–43.
- Bogani G., Ray-Coquard I., Concin N. et al. Liquid biopsy in ovarian cancer: the potential of circulating tumor DNA and ascites analysis. Ann Oncol 2023;34(5):456–68.
- Kurnit K.C., Brown A.J., Harrell M.I. et al. Microcapsule rupture in early ovarian cancer: long–term outcomes from the OVARIAN study. Gynecol Oncol 2024;185:112–20.
- Bakkum-Gamez J.N., Richardson D.L., Seamon L.G. et al. Influence of intraoperative capsule rupture on outcomes in stage I epithelial ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133(3):525–33.
- Park J.Y., Kim D.Y., Suh D.S. et al. Significance of ovarian capsular involvement in early-stage ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2016;142(2):256–9.
- NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®). Ovarian Cancer. Version 3.2024.
- Chiva L., Lapuente F., Gonzalez-Martín A. et al. Revisiting the FIGO IC3 substage: does minimal ascites matter? Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024;34(2):189–95.
Supplementary files

