<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Tumors of female reproductive system</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Tumors of female reproductive system</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Опухоли женской репродуктивной системы</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1994-4098</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">1999-8627</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Publishing House ABV Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">117</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17650/1994-4098-2012-0-3-4-61-72</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>MAMMOLOGY. TREATMENT</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МАММОЛОГИЯ. ЛЕЧЕНИЕ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Choice of adjuvant drug therapy on the basis of the molecular classification of breast cancer</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Выбор адъювантной лекарственной терапии на основе молекулярной классификации рака молочной железы</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Besova</surname><given-names>N. S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Бесова</surname><given-names>Н. С.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>besovans@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ «РОНЦ им. Н.Н. Блохина» РАМН, Москва</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2012-09-24" publication-format="electronic"><day>24</day><month>09</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><issue>3-4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>61</fpage><lpage>72</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2014-07-24"><day>24</day><month>07</month><year>2014</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2014-07-24"><day>24</day><month>07</month><year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-year>2012</copyright-year><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://ojrs.abvpress.ru/ojrs/article/view/117">https://ojrs.abvpress.ru/ojrs/article/view/117</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Molecular genetic analysis identified some biological subtypes of breast cancer (BC): luminal A, luminal B, HER2 positive, and basal-like (including triple negative). The surrogate clinical and morphological criteria including the immunohistochemical determination of estrogen and progesterone receptors, the hyperexpression and/or amplification of HER2, Ki-67, or tumor grade (G) are used to identify the biological subtypes of BC in clinical practice. The biological subtypes are distinguished by their biological course and susceptibility to various systemic treatments, which requires different therapeutic tactics. The paper presents tactics of adjuvant therapy for BC in relation to its biological subtype according to the recommendations of the 12th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference (2011) and considers the place of taxans.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>На основе молекулярно-генетического анализа выделено несколько биологических подтипов рака молочной железы (РМЖ): люминальный А, люминальный В, HER2-позитивный и базальноподобный (включая и трижды негативный: ТН РМЖ). В клинической практике для идентификации биологических подтипов РМЖ используются суррогатные клинико-морфологические критерии, включающие иммуногистохимическое определение рецепторов эстрогена и прогестерона, гиперэкспрессии и/или амплификации HER2, Ki-67 или степени злокачественности опухоли (G). Биологические подтипы различаются по биологическому течению и чувствительности к разным видам системного лечения, что требует различной терапевтической тактики. В статье представлена тактика адъювантной терапии РМЖ в зависимости от биологического подтипа опухоли согласно рекомендациям 12-й Международной конференции по лечению РМЖ (Сант-Галлен, 2011 г.), рассмотрено место таксанов.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>breast cancer</kwd><kwd>biological subtypes</kwd><kwd>adjuvant chemotherapy</kwd><kwd>taxans</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>рак молочной железы</kwd><kwd>биологические подтипы</kwd><kwd>адъювантная химиотерапия</kwd><kwd>таксаны</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">1. Perou C.M., Sorlie T., Eisen M.B. et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.Nature 2000;406:747−52.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Perou C.M., Sorlie T., Eisen M.B. et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.Nature 2000;406:747−52.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">2. Prat A., Perou C.M. Deconstructing the molecular portraits of breast cancer. Mol Oncol 2011;5:5−23.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Prat A., Perou C.M. Deconstructing the molecular portraits of breast cancer. Mol Oncol 2011;5:5−23.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">3. Parker J.S., Mullins M., Cheang M.C. et al. Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:1160−7.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Parker J.S., Mullins M., Cheang M.C. et al. Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:1160−7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">4. Nielsen T.O., Hsu F.D., Jensen K. et al. Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:5367−74.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nielsen T.O., Hsu F.D., Jensen K. et al. Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:5367−74.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">5. Blows F.M., Driver K.E., Schmidt M.K. et al. Subtyping of breast cancer by immunohistochemistry to investigate a relationship between subtype and short and long term survival: a collaborative analysis of data for 10,159 cases from 12 studies. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000279.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Blows F.M., Driver K.E., Schmidt M.K. et al. Subtyping of breast cancer by immunohistochemistry to investigate a relationship between subtype and short and long term survival: a collaborative analysis of data for 10,159 cases from 12 studies. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000279.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">6. Hugh J., Hanson J., Cheang M.C. et al. Breast cancer subtypes and response to docetaxel in node-positive breast cancer: use of an immunohistochemical definition in the BCIRG 001 Trial. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:1168−76.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hugh J., Hanson J., Cheang M.C. et al. Breast cancer subtypes and response to docetaxel in node-positive breast cancer: use of an immunohistochemical definition in the BCIRG 001 Trial. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:1168−76.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">7. Cheang M.C., Chia S.K, Voduc D. et al. Ki67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009;101:736−50.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cheang M.C., Chia S.K, Voduc D. et al. Ki67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009;101:736−50.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">8. Millikan R.C., Newman B., Tse C.K. et al. Epidemiology of basal-like breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008; 109:123−39.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Millikan R.C., Newman B., Tse C.K. et al. Epidemiology of basal-like breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008; 109:123−39.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">9. Phipps A.I., Chlebowski R.T., Prentice R. et al. Body size, physical activity, and risk of triple-negative and estrogen receptor- positive breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011;20:454−63.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Phipps A.I., Chlebowski R.T., Prentice R. et al. Body size, physical activity, and risk of triple-negative and estrogen receptor- positive breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011;20:454−63.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">10. Phipps A.I., Buist D.S., Malone K.E. et al. Reproductive history and risk of three breast cancer subtypes defined by three biomarkers. Cancer Causes Control 2011; 22:399−405.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Phipps A.I., Buist D.S., Malone K.E. et al. Reproductive history and risk of three breast cancer subtypes defined by three biomarkers. Cancer Causes Control 2011; 22:399−405.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">11. Liedtke C., Mazouni C., Hess K.R. et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and longterm survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:1275−81.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Liedtke C., Mazouni C., Hess K.R. et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and longterm survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:1275−81.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">12. Dignam J.J., Dukic V., Anderson S.J. et al. Hazard of recurrence and adjuvant treatment effects over time in lymph node-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009;116:595−602.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dignam J.J., Dukic V., Anderson S.J. et al. Hazard of recurrence and adjuvant treatment effects over time in lymph node-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009;116:595−602.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">13. Aebi S., Sun Z., Braun D. et al. Differential efficacy of three cycles of CMF followed by tamoxifen in patients with ER-positive and ER-negative tumors: long-term follow up on IBCSG Trial IX. Ann Oncol 2011 [epub ahead of print 31 January 2011] doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq754.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aebi S., Sun Z., Braun D. et al. Differential efficacy of three cycles of CMF followed by tamoxifen in patients with ER-positive and ER-negative tumors: long-term follow up on IBCSG Trial IX. Ann Oncol 2011 [epub ahead of print 31 January 2011] doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq754.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">14. Albain K.S., Barlow W.E., Shak S. et al. Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11:55−65.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Albain K.S., Barlow W.E., Shak S. et al. Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11:55−65.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">15. Nguyen P.L., Taghian A.G., Katz M.S. et al. Breast cancer subtype approximated by estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER-2 is associated with local and distant recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:2373−8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nguyen P.L., Taghian A.G., Katz M.S. et al. Breast cancer subtype approximated by estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER-2 is associated with local and distant recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:2373−8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">16. Wo J.Y., Taghian A.G., Nguyen P.L. et al. The association between biological subtype and isolated regional nodal failure after breast-conserving therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;77:188−96.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wo J.Y., Taghian A.G., Nguyen P.L. et al. The association between biological subtype and isolated regional nodal failure after breast-conserving therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;77:188−96.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">17. Tang G., Shak S., Paik S. et al. Comparison of the prognostic and predictive utilities of the 21-gene recurrence score assay and Adjuvant for women with node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011;127:133−42.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tang G., Shak S., Paik S. et al. Comparison of the prognostic and predictive utilities of the 21-gene recurrence score assay and Adjuvant for women with node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011;127:133−42.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">18. Hugh J., Hanson J., Cheang M.C. et al. Breast cancer subtypes and response to docetaxel in node-positive breast cancer: Use of an immunohistochemical definition in the BCIRG 001 trial. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:1168−76.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hugh J., Hanson J., Cheang M.C. et al. Breast cancer subtypes and response to docetaxel in node-positive breast cancer: Use of an immunohistochemical definition in the BCIRG 001 trial. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:1168−76.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">19. Goldhirsch A., Wood W.C., Coates A.S. et al. Strategies for subtypes−dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Annals of Oncology Advance Access published June 27,2011;1−12.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Goldhirsch A., Wood W.C., Coates A.S. et al. Strategies for subtypes−dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Annals of Oncology Advance Access published June 27,2011;1−12.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">20. Citron M.L., Berry D.A., Cirrincione C. et al. Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:1431−9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Citron M.L., Berry D.A., Cirrincione C. et al. Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:1431−9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">21. Henderson I.C., Berry D.A., Demetri G.D. et al. Improved outcomes from adding sequential paclitaxel but not from escalating doxorubicin dose in an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with node-positive primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:976−83.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Henderson I.C., Berry D.A., Demetri G.D. et al. Improved outcomes from adding sequential paclitaxel but not from escalating doxorubicin dose in an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with node-positive primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:976−83.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">22. Mamounas E., Bryant J., Lembersky B. et al. Paclitaxel after doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-28. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:3686−96.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mamounas E., Bryant J., Lembersky B. et al. Paclitaxel after doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-28. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:3686−96.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">23. Gianni L., Baselga J., Eiermann W. et al Phase III trial evaluating the addition of paclitaxel to doxorubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil, as adjuvant or primary systemic therapy: European Cooperative Trial in Operable Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:2474−81.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gianni L., Baselga J., Eiermann W. et al Phase III trial evaluating the addition of paclitaxel to doxorubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil, as adjuvant or primary systemic therapy: European Cooperative Trial in Operable Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:2474−81.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">24. Buzdar A.U., Singletary S.E., Valero V. et al. Evaluation of paclitaxel in adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with operable breast cancer: preliminary data of a prospective randomized trial. Clin Cancer Res 2002;8:1073−9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Buzdar A.U., Singletary S.E., Valero V. et al. Evaluation of paclitaxel in adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with operable breast cancer: preliminary data of a prospective randomized trial. Clin Cancer Res 2002;8:1073−9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">25. Albert J.M., Buzdar A.U., Guzman R. et al. Prospective randomized trial of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) versus paclitaxel and FAC (TFAC) in patients with operable breast cancer: impact of taxane chemotherapy on locoregional control. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011 Jul; 128(2):421−7.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Albert J.M., Buzdar A.U., Guzman R. et al. Prospective randomized trial of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) versus paclitaxel and FAC (TFAC) in patients with operable breast cancer: impact of taxane chemotherapy on locoregional control. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011 Jul; 128(2):421−7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">26. Sparano J.A., Wang M., Martino S. et al. Phase III study of doxorubicin cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel or docetaxel given every 3 weeks or weekly in patients with axillary node-positive or high-risk nodenegative breast cancer: results of North American Breast Cancer Intergroup Trial E1199. San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, San Antonio, 2005.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sparano J.A., Wang M., Martino S. et al. Phase III study of doxorubicin cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel or docetaxel given every 3 weeks or weekly in patients with axillary node-positive or high-risk nodenegative breast cancer: results of North American Breast Cancer Intergroup Trial E1199. San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, San Antonio, 2005.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">27. Martin M., Rodriguez-Lescure A., Ruiz A. et al. Randomized phase 3 trial of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclo- phosphamide alone or followed by paclitaxel for early breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:805−14.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Martin M., Rodriguez-Lescure A., Ruiz A. et al. Randomized phase 3 trial of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclo- phosphamide alone or followed by paclitaxel for early breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:805−14.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">28. Loesch D., Greco F.A., Senzer N.N. et al. Phase III multicenter trial of doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel compared with doxorubicin plus paclitaxel followed by weekly paclitaxel as adjuvant therapy for women with high-risk breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010 Jun 20; 28(18):2958−65.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Loesch D., Greco F.A., Senzer N.N. et al. Phase III multicenter trial of doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel compared with doxorubicin plus paclitaxel followed by weekly paclitaxel as adjuvant therapy for women with high-risk breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010 Jun 20; 28(18):2958−65.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">29. Martín M., Rodríguez-Lescure A., Ruiz A. et al. Molecular predictors of efficacy of adjuvant weekly paclitaxel in early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010 Aug;123(1):149−57.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Martín M., Rodríguez-Lescure A., Ruiz A. et al. Molecular predictors of efficacy of adjuvant weekly paclitaxel in early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010 Aug;123(1):149−57.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">30. Laporte S., Jones S., Chapelle C. et al. Consistency of effect of docetaxel containing adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early stage breast cancer independent of nodal status: Meta-analysis of 12 randomized clinical trials [abstract 605]. Presented at the 2009 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, San Antonio, Texas, 2009.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Laporte S., Jones S., Chapelle C. et al. Consistency of effect of docetaxel containing adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early stage breast cancer independent of nodal status: Meta-analysis of 12 randomized clinical trials [abstract 605]. Presented at the 2009 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, San Antonio, Texas, 2009.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">31. Swain S.M. Chemotherapy: updates and new perspectives. The Oncologist 2011; 16(1):30−9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Swain S.M. Chemotherapy: updates and new perspectives. The Oncologist 2011; 16(1):30−9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">32. Jones S., Holmes F.A., O’Shaughnessy J. et al. Docetaxel with cyclophosphamide is associated with an overall survival benefit compared with doxorubicinand cyclophosphamide: 7-Year follow-up of US Oncology research trial 9735. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:1177−83.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jones S., Holmes F.A., O’Shaughnessy J. et al. Docetaxel with cyclophosphamide is associated with an overall survival benefit compared with doxorubicinand cyclophosphamide: 7-Year follow-up of US Oncology research trial 9735. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:1177−83.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">33. Penault-Llorca F., André F., Sagan C. et al. Ki67 expression and docetaxel efficacy in patients with estrogen receptor- positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:2809−15.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Penault-Llorca F., André F., Sagan C. et al. Ki67 expression and docetaxel efficacy in patients with estrogen receptor- positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:2809−15.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
