<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Tumors of female reproductive system</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Tumors of female reproductive system</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Опухоли женской репродуктивной системы</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1994-4098</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">1999-8627</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Publishing House ABV Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">358</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17650/1994-4098-2008-0-3-20-23</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>MAMMOLOGY. LECTURE</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МАММОЛОГИЯ. ЛЕКЦИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Screening mammography in the diagnosis of cancer in situ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>РОЛЬ И МЕСТО СКРИНИНГОВОЙ МАММОГРАФИИ В ДИАГНОСТИКЕ РАКА IN SITU</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Komarova</surname><given-names>L. Ye.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Комарова</surname><given-names>Л. Е.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en"></institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ГУ РОНЦ им. Н.Н. Блохина РАМН, Москва</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2008-08-16" publication-format="electronic"><day>16</day><month>08</month><year>2008</year></pub-date><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>20</fpage><lpage>23</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2014-09-17"><day>17</day><month>09</month><year>2014</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2014-09-17"><day>17</day><month>09</month><year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-year>2008</copyright-year><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://ojrs.abvpress.ru/ojrs/article/view/358">https://ojrs.abvpress.ru/ojrs/article/view/358</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Screening mammography in the diagnosis of cancer<italic> in situ</italic></p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>РОЛЬ И МЕСТО СКРИНИНГОВОЙ МАММОГРАФИИ В ДИАГНОСТИКЕ РАКА IN SITU</p></trans-abstract><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">1. Рак молочной железы. Под ред. М.И. Давыдова, В.П. Летягина. М.; 2006.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Рак молочной железы. Под ред. М.И. Давыдова, В.П. Летягина. М.; 2006.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">2. Silva O.E., Zurrida S. Breast cancer: a practical guide. 3rd. NY, Elsevier; 2005. p. 54—5.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Silva O.E., Zurrida S. Breast cancer: a practical guide. 3rd. NY, Elsevier; 2005. p. 54—5.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">3. Luke C., Priest K., Roder D. Changes in incidence of in situ and invasive breast cancer by histology type following mam- mography screening. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2006;7(1):69—74.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Luke C., Priest K., Roder D. Changes in incidence of in situ and invasive breast cancer by histology type following mam- mography screening. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2006;7(1):69—74.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">4. Julien J.-P. et al on behalf of the EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and the EORTC Radiotherapy Group. Radiotherapy in breast-conserv- ing treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: first results from the EORTC ran- domized phase III trial 10853. Lancet 2000;355:528—33.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Julien J.-P. et al on behalf of the EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and the EORTC Radiotherapy Group. Radiotherapy in breast-conserv- ing treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: first results from the EORTC ran- domized phase III trial 10853. Lancet 2000;355:528—33.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">5. Fisher B., Dignam J., Wolmar K.N. et al. Tamoxifen in treatment of intraduc- tal breast cancer. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-24 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1999;353:1993—2000.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fisher B., Dignam J., Wolmar K.N. et al. Tamoxifen in treatment of intraduc- tal breast cancer. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-24 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1999;353:1993—2000.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">6. UK Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research (UK CCCR) Ductal Carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Working Party on behalf of DCIS trialists in the UK, Australia and New Zealand. Radiotherapy and tamoxifen in women with completely excised ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the UK, Australia and New Zealand: randomized con- trolled trial. Lancet 2003;362:95—102.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">UK Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research (UK CCCR) Ductal Carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Working Party on behalf of DCIS trialists in the UK, Australia and New Zealand. Radiotherapy and tamoxifen in women with completely excised ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the UK, Australia and New Zealand: randomized con- trolled trial. Lancet 2003;362:95—102.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">7. Fisher B., Land S., Mamonnas E. et al. Prevention of invasive breast cancer in women with ductal carcinoma in situ: an update of the national surgical adju- vant breast and bowel project experience. Semin Oncol 2001;28(4):400—18.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fisher B., Land S., Mamonnas E. et al. Prevention of invasive breast cancer in women with ductal carcinoma in situ: an update of the national surgical adju- vant breast and bowel project experience. Semin Oncol 2001;28(4):400—18.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">8. Evans A.J., Pinder S.E., Ellis I.O. et al. Screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): overdiagnosis or obligate precursor of invasive disease? J Med Screen 2001;8:149—51.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Evans A.J., Pinder S.E., Ellis I.O. et al. Screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): overdiagnosis or obligate precursor of invasive disease? J Med Screen 2001;8:149—51.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">9. Claus E.B., Stowe M., Carter D. Breast carcinoma in situ; risk factors and screening patterns. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93(23):1811—7.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Claus E.B., Stowe M., Carter D. Breast carcinoma in situ; risk factors and screening patterns. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93(23):1811—7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">10. Summer W.E., Koniaris L.G., Snell S.E. et al. Results of 23810 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:1540—50.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Summer W.E., Koniaris L.G., Snell S.E. et al. Results of 23810 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:1540—50.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">11. Irvine T., Fentiman I.S. Biology and treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2007;7(2):135—45.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Irvine T., Fentiman I.S. Biology and treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2007;7(2):135—45.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">12. Ernster V.L., Ballard-Barbash R., Barlow W.E. et al. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95(6):487—8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ernster V.L., Ballard-Barbash R., Barlow W.E. et al. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95(6):487—8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">13. Kaplan R.M., Saltzstein S.L. Reduced mammographic screening may explain declines in breast carcinoma in older women. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53(5):862—6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kaplan R.M., Saltzstein S.L. Reduced mammographic screening may explain declines in breast carcinoma in older women. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53(5):862—6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">14. Erbas B., Amos A., Fletcher A. et al. Incidence of invasive breast cancer carci- noma in situ in a screening program by age : should older women continue screening? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13(10):1569—73.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Erbas B., Amos A., Fletcher A. et al. Incidence of invasive breast cancer carci- noma in situ in a screening program by age : should older women continue screening? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13(10):1569—73.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">15. Li J., Hemminki K. Risk for con- tralateral breast cancers in population covered by mammography: effects of family history, age at diagnosis and histol- ogy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007; 105(2):229—36.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Li J., Hemminki K. Risk for con- tralateral breast cancers in population covered by mammography: effects of family history, age at diagnosis and histol- ogy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007; 105(2):229—36.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">16. Claus E.B., Stowe M. et al. The risk of contralateral breast cancer among women diagnosed with ductal and lobular breast carcinoma in situ: data from the Connecticut Tumor Registry. Breast 2003;12(6):451—6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Claus E.B., Stowe M. et al. The risk of contralateral breast cancer among women diagnosed with ductal and lobular breast carcinoma in situ: data from the Connecticut Tumor Registry. Breast 2003;12(6):451—6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">17. Daly M.B. Tamoxifen in ductal car- cinoma in situ. Semin Oncol 2006;33(6):647—9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Daly M.B. Tamoxifen in ductal car- cinoma in situ. Semin Oncol 2006;33(6):647—9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">18. Evans A.J., Pinder S., Ellis I.O. et al. Screening-detected and sympto- matic ductal carcinoma in situ: mammo- graphic features with pathologic correla- tion. Radiology 1994;191(1):</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Evans A.J., Pinder S., Ellis I.O. et al. Screening-detected and sympto- matic ductal carcinoma in situ: mammo- graphic features with pathologic correla- tion. Radiology 1994;191(1):</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">237—40.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">—40.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">19. Shin H.J., Kim H.H., Kim S.M. et al. Screening-detected and sympto- matic ductal carcinoma in situ: differ- ences in the sonographic and pathologic features. Am J Roentgenol 2008;190(2):516—25.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shin H.J., Kim H.H., Kim S.M. et al. Screening-detected and sympto- matic ductal carcinoma in situ: differ- ences in the sonographic and pathologic features. Am J Roentgenol 2008;190(2):516—25.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">20. Li C.I., Malone K.E., Satzman B.S. et al. Risk of invasive breast carcinoma among women diagnosed with ductal car- cinoma in situ and lobular carcinoma in situ, 1988-2001. Cancer 2006;106(10):2104—12.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Li C.I., Malone K.E., Satzman B.S. et al. Risk of invasive breast carcinoma among women diagnosed with ductal car- cinoma in situ and lobular carcinoma in situ, 1988-2001. Cancer 2006;106(10):2104—12.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">21. Hwang E.S., Mc Lennan J.L., Moore D.H. et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ in BRCA mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 2007;25(6):642—7.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hwang E.S., Mc Lennan J.L., Moore D.H. et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ in BRCA mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 2007;25(6):642—7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">22. Claus E.B., Petruzella S., Carter D. et al. Prevalence of BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutations in women diagnosed with duc- tal carcinoma in situ. JAMA 2005;294(5):553—4.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Claus E.B., Petruzella S., Carter D. et al. Prevalence of BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutations in women diagnosed with duc- tal carcinoma in situ. JAMA 2005;294(5):553—4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">23. Smith K.L., Adank M., Kauff N. et al. BRCA mutation in women with ductal carcinoma in situ. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13(14):4306—10.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Smith K.L., Adank M., Kauff N. et al. BRCA mutation in women with ductal carcinoma in situ. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13(14):4306—10.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
