<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Tumors of female reproductive system</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Tumors of female reproductive system</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Опухоли женской репродуктивной системы</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1994-4098</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">1999-8627</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Publishing House ABV Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">447</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17650/1994-4098-2015-11-3-43-60</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>MAMMOLOGY. TREATMENT</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МАММОЛОГИЯ. ЛЕЧЕНИЕ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">General St. Gallen-2015 guidelines for the treatment of early breast cancer (adapted by the experts of the Russian Society of Breast Oncologists)</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Общие рекомендации по лечению раннего рака молочной железы St. Gallen-2015, адаптированные экспертами Российского общества онкомаммологов</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Semiglazov</surname><given-names>V. F.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Семиглазов</surname><given-names>В. Ф.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Paltuev</surname><given-names>R. M.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Палтуев</surname><given-names>Р. М.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Semiglazov</surname><given-names>V. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Семиглазов</surname><given-names>В. В.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Dashyan</surname><given-names>G. A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Дашян</surname><given-names>Г. А.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Semiglazova</surname><given-names>T. Yu.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Семиглазова</surname><given-names>Т. Ю.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Krivorotko</surname><given-names>P. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Криворотько</surname><given-names>П. В.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Nikolaev</surname><given-names>K. S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Николаев</surname><given-names>К. С.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution></institution></aff><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2015-09-16" publication-format="electronic"><day>16</day><month>09</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>43</fpage><lpage>60</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2015-09-15"><day>15</day><month>09</month><year>2015</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2015-09-15"><day>15</day><month>09</month><year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://ojrs.abvpress.ru/ojrs/article/view/447">https://ojrs.abvpress.ru/ojrs/article/view/447</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p/><p/><p/><p>General St. Gallen-2015 guidelines for the treatment of early breast cancer (adapted by the experts of the Russian Society of Breast Oncologists) </p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В марте 2015 г. завершила работу 14-я Международная конференция по раку молочной железы St. Gallen-2015, проведенная в Вене впервые. </p><p>Как и прежде, конференция закончилась принятием консенсус-документа о рекомендациях по местному и системному лечению ранних (операбельных) стадий рака молочной железы. Не все страны, включая Европу и Северную Америку, безоговорочно принимают отдельные положения рекомендаций. В частности, эксперты Российского общества онкомаммологов (РООМ) подходят с осторожностью к оценке «чистых» хирургических краев при выполнении органосохраняющего лечения, а также к планированию лечения минимальных опухолей pT1b–cN0M0. Впервые в практике работы конференции St. Gallen были рассмотрены и учтены в общих рекомендациях отдельные предложения экспертов РООМ по планированию адъювантного лечения в зависимости от биологических и клинико-анатомических характеристик заболевания. Многие положения наших рекомендаций 2012–2013 гг. нашли свое отражение в итоговой резолюции международного консенсуса St. Gallen. Это касается как лечебно-ориентированной классификации подгрупп рака молочной железы в целом, так и проблем стандартизации оценки маркера активности опухоли Ki-67 в различных лабораториях и вопроса об улучшении прогностической эффективности использования маркеров ER и PR. </p><p>Основные положения рекомендаций St. Gallen учитываются при разработке ESMO. </p></trans-abstract><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">1. Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Ervik M. et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v 1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide. IARC CancerBase No. 11. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2013.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Ervik M. et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v 1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide. IARC CancerBase No. 11. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2013.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">2. Coates A.S. Evolution of the St. Gallen Consensus process for the optimal treatment of women with breast cancer. The Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):PG 0.1.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Coates A.S. Evolution of the St. Gallen Consensus process for the optimal treatment of women with breast cancer. The Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):PG 0.1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">3. Francis P.A., Regan M.M., Fleming G.F. et al. Adjuvant ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2015;372:436–46.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Francis P.A., Regan M.M., Fleming G.F. et al. Adjuvant ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2015;372:436–46.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">4. Moore H.C.F., Unger J.M., Phillips K.A. et al. Goserelin for Ovarian Protection during Breast-Cancer Adjuvant Chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 2015;372:923–32.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Moore H.C.F., Unger J.M., Phillips K.A. et al. Goserelin for Ovarian Protection during Breast-Cancer Adjuvant Chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 2015;372:923–32.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">5. Pagani О., Regan M.M., Walley B.A. et al. Adjuvant exemestane with ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2014;371:107–18.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pagani О., Regan M.M., Walley B.A. et al. Adjuvant exemestane with ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2014;371:107–18.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">6. Moran M.S., Schnitt S.J., Giuliano A.E. et al. Society of Surgical Oncology – American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:1507–15.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Moran M.S., Schnitt S.J., Giuliano A.E. et al. Society of Surgical Oncology – American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:1507–15.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">7. Budach W., Kammers K., Boelke E. et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy of regional lymph nodes in breast cancer – a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Radiat Oncol 2013;8:267.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Budach W., Kammers K., Boelke E. et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy of regional lymph nodes in breast cancer – a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Radiat Oncol 2013;8:267.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">8. Nordenskjold A.E., Fohlin H.I., Albertsson P. et al. No clear effect of postoperative radiotherapy on survival of breast cancer patients with 1–3 positive nodes: а population-based study. Ann Oncol 2015;26(6):1149–54.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nordenskjold A.E., Fohlin H.I., Albertsson P. et al. No clear effect of postoperative radiotherapy on survival of breast cancer patients with 1–3 positive nodes: а population-based study. Ann Oncol 2015;26(6):1149–54.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">9. Haviland J.S., Owen J.R., Dewar J.A. et al. The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trials of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: 10-year follow-up results of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet Oncol 2013;14:1086–94.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Haviland J.S., Owen J.R., Dewar J.A. et al. The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trials of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: 10-year follow-up results of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet Oncol 2013;14:1086–94.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">10. Whelan T.J., Pignol J.P., Levine M.N. et al. Long-term results of hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;362:513–20.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Whelan T.J., Pignol J.P., Levine M.N. et al. Long-term results of hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;362:513–20.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">11. Dowsett M. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: patient selection, treatment duration and surrogate endpoints. Breast 2015; 24(Suppl 1):PG 8.02.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dowsett M. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: patient selection, treatment duration and surrogate endpoints. Breast 2015; 24(Suppl 1):PG 8.02.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">12. Regan M. Predicting benefit of endocrine therapy. Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):PG 11.03.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Regan M. Predicting benefit of endocrine therapy. Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):PG 11.03.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">13. Viale G., Regan M.M., Dell'Orto P. et al. Which patients benefit most from adjuvant aromatase inhibitors? Results using a composite measure of prognostic risk in the BIG 1-98 randomized trial. Ann Oncol 2011;22:2201–7.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Viale G., Regan M.M., Dell'Orto P. et al. Which patients benefit most from adjuvant aromatase inhibitors? Results using a composite measure of prognostic risk in the BIG 1-98 randomized trial. Ann Oncol 2011;22:2201–7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">14. Regan M.M., Neven P., Giobbie-Hurder A. et al. Assessment of letrozole and tamoxifen alone and in sequence for postmenopausal women with steroid hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: the BIG 1-98 randomised clinical trial at 8.1 years median follow-up. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:1101–8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Regan M.M., Neven P., Giobbie-Hurder A. et al. Assessment of letrozole and tamoxifen alone and in sequence for postmenopausal women with steroid hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: the BIG 1-98 randomised clinical trial at 8.1 years median follow-up. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:1101–8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">15. The Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 2012;490:61–70.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 2012;490:61–70.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">16. Sorlie T., Perou C.M., Tibshirani R. et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:10869–74.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sorlie T., Perou C.M., Tibshirani R. et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:10869–74.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">17. Bayraktar S., Royce M., Stork-Sloots L. et al. Molecular subtyping predict pathologic tumor response in early-stage breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel plus capecitabine with or without trastuzumab. Med Oncol 2014;31:163–73.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bayraktar S., Royce M., Stork-Sloots L. et al. Molecular subtyping predict pathologic tumor response in early-stage breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel plus capecitabine with or without trastuzumab. Med Oncol 2014;31:163–73.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">18. Dowsett M., Sestak I., Lopez-Knowles E. et al. Comparison of PAM50 risk of recurrence score with oncotype DX and IHC4 for predicting risk of distant recurrence after endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:2783–90.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dowsett M., Sestak I., Lopez-Knowles E. et al. Comparison of PAM50 risk of recurrence score with oncotype DX and IHC4 for predicting risk of distant recurrence after endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:2783–90.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">19. Eiermann W., Rezai M., Kummel S. et al. The 21-gene recurrence score assay impacts adjuvant therapy recommendations for ERpositive, node-negative and node-positive early breast cancer resulting in a risk-adapted change in chemotherapy use. Ann Oncol 2013;24: 618–24.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Eiermann W., Rezai M., Kummel S. et al. The 21-gene recurrence score assay impacts adjuvant therapy recommendations for ERpositive, node-negative and node-positive early breast cancer resulting in a risk-adapted change in chemotherapy use. Ann Oncol 2013;24: 618–24.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">20. Nielsen T.O., Parker J.S., Leung S. et al. A comparison of PAM50 intrinsic subtyping with immunohistochemistry and clinical prognostic factors in tamoxifen-treated estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2010;16:5222–32.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nielsen T.O., Parker J.S., Leung S. et al. A comparison of PAM50 intrinsic subtyping with immunohistochemistry and clinical prognostic factors in tamoxifen-treated estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2010;16:5222–32.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">21. Prat A., Adamo B., Cheang M.C. et al. non-basal-like triple-negative breast cancer. Oncologist 2013;18:123–33.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Prat A., Adamo B., Cheang M.C. et al. non-basal-like triple-negative breast cancer. Oncologist 2013;18:123–33.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">22. Coates A.S., Millar E.K., O'Toole S.A. et al. Prognostic interaction between expression of p53 and estrogen receptor in patients with node-negative breast cancer: results from IBCSG Trials VIII and IX. Breast Cancer Res 2012;14:143.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Coates A.S., Millar E.K., O'Toole S.A. et al. Prognostic interaction between expression of p53 and estrogen receptor in patients with node-negative breast cancer: results from IBCSG Trials VIII and IX. Breast Cancer Res 2012;14:143.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">23. Regan M.M., Pagani О., Walley В. et al. Premenopausal endocrine-responsive early breast cancer: who receives chemotherapy? Ann Oncol 2008;19:1231–41.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Regan M.M., Pagani О., Walley В. et al. Premenopausal endocrine-responsive early breast cancer: who receives chemotherapy? Ann Oncol 2008;19:1231–41.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">24. Wirapati P., Sotiriou C., Kunkel S. et al. Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles in breast cancer: toward a unified understanding of breast cancer subtyping and prognosis signatures. Breast Cancer Res 2008;10:R65.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wirapati P., Sotiriou C., Kunkel S. et al. Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles in breast cancer: toward a unified understanding of breast cancer subtyping and prognosis signatures. Breast Cancer Res 2008;10:R65.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">25. de Azambuja E., Cardoso F., de Castro G. Jr et al. Ki-67 as prognostic marker in early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of published studies involving 12 155 patients. Br J Cancer 2007;96:1504–13.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">de Azambuja E., Cardoso F., de Castro G. Jr et al. Ki-67 as prognostic marker in early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of published studies involving 12 155 patients. Br J Cancer 2007;96:1504–13.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">26. Denkert C., von M.G. Reply to Ki-67 in breast cancer: a useful prognostic marker! Ann Oncol 2014;25:542–3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Denkert C., von M.G. Reply to Ki-67 in breast cancer: a useful prognostic marker! Ann Oncol 2014;25:542–3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">27. Polley M.Y., Leung S.C., McShane L.M. et al. An international Ki-67 reproducibility study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2013;105:1897–906.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Polley M.Y., Leung S.C., McShane L.M. et al. An international Ki-67 reproducibility study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2013;105:1897–906.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">28. Bastien R.R., Rodriguez-Lescure A., Ebbert M.T. et al. PAM50 breast cancer subtyping by RT-qPCR and concordance with standard clinical molecular markers. BMC Med Genomics 2012;5:44.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bastien R.R., Rodriguez-Lescure A., Ebbert M.T. et al. PAM50 breast cancer subtyping by RT-qPCR and concordance with standard clinical molecular markers. BMC Med Genomics 2012;5:44.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">29. Houssami N., Morrow M. Margins in breast conservation: a clinician's perspective and what the literature tells us. J Surg Oncol 2014;110:2–7.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Houssami N., Morrow M. Margins in breast conservation: a clinician's perspective and what the literature tells us. J Surg Oncol 2014;110:2–7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">30. Donker M., van Tienhoven G., Straver M.E. et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:1303–10.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Donker M., van Tienhoven G., Straver M.E. et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:1303–10.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">31. Giuliano A.E., Hunt K.K., Ballman K.V. et al. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis. JAMA 2011;305:569–75.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Giuliano A.E., Hunt K.K., Ballman K.V. et al. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis. JAMA 2011;305:569–75.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">32. Dengel L.T., van Zee K.J., King Т.А. et al. Axillary dissection can be avoided in the majority of clinically node-negative patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2014;21:22–7.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dengel L.T., van Zee K.J., King Т.А. et al. Axillary dissection can be avoided in the majority of clinically node-negative patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2014;21:22–7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">33. Yao K., Winchester D.J., Czechura T. et al. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and survival: report from the National Cancer Data Base, 1998–2002. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013;142:465–76.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yao K., Winchester D.J., Czechura T. et al. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and survival: report from the National Cancer Data Base, 1998–2002. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013;142:465–76.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">34. Narod S.A. The impact of contralateral mastectomy on mortality in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011;128:581–3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Narod S.A. The impact of contralateral mastectomy on mortality in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011;128:581–3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">35. Kurian A.W., Lichtensztajn D.Y., Keegan T.H. et al. Use of and mortality after bilateral mastectomy compared with other surgical treatments for breast cancer in California, 1998–2011. JAMA 2014;312:902–14.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kurian A.W., Lichtensztajn D.Y., Keegan T.H. et al. Use of and mortality after bilateral mastectomy compared with other surgical treatments for breast cancer in California, 1998–2011. JAMA 2014;312:902–14.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">36. Guth U., Myrick M.E., Viehl C.T. et al. Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy – a trend made in USA? Eur J Surg Oncol 2012;38:296–301.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Guth U., Myrick M.E., Viehl C.T. et al. Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy – a trend made in USA? Eur J Surg Oncol 2012;38:296–301.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">37. Partridge A.H., Gelber S., PiccartGebhart M.J. et al. Effect of age on breast cancer outcomes in women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: results from a herceptin adjuvant trial. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:2692–8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Partridge A.H., Gelber S., PiccartGebhart M.J. et al. Effect of age on breast cancer outcomes in women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: results from a herceptin adjuvant trial. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:2692–8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">38. Boileau J.F., Poirier B., Basik M. et al. Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer: the SN FNAC Study. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:258–64.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Boileau J.F., Poirier B., Basik M. et al. Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer: the SN FNAC Study. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:258–64.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">39. Boughey J.C., Suman V.J., Mittendorf E.A. et al. Factors affecting sentinel lymph node identification rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer patients enrolled in ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance). Ann Surg 2015;261:547–52.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Boughey J.C., Suman V.J., Mittendorf E.A. et al. Factors affecting sentinel lymph node identification rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer patients enrolled in ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance). Ann Surg 2015;261:547–52.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">40. Galimberti V. Feasibility of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer after neoadjuvant treatment. Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):PG 9.02.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galimberti V. Feasibility of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer after neoadjuvant treatment. Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):PG 9.02.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">41. Kuehn T., Bauerfeind I., Fehm T. et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2013;14:609–18.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kuehn T., Bauerfeind I., Fehm T. et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2013;14:609–18.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">42. Ataseven B., Lederer B., Blohmer J.U. et al. Impact of multifocal or multicentric disease on surgery and locoregional, distant and overall survival of 6,134 breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22: 1118–27.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ataseven B., Lederer B., Blohmer J.U. et al. Impact of multifocal or multicentric disease on surgery and locoregional, distant and overall survival of 6,134 breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22: 1118–27.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">43. Wolmark N., Mamounas E.P., Baehner F.L. et al. Recurence score and quantitative ER expression to predict in late distant recurrence risk in ER+ BC after 5 years of tamoxifen. J Clin Oncol 2014;32(Suppl):Abstr 11024.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wolmark N., Mamounas E.P., Baehner F.L. et al. Recurence score and quantitative ER expression to predict in late distant recurrence risk in ER+ BC after 5 years of tamoxifen. J Clin Oncol 2014;32(Suppl):Abstr 11024.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">44. Sestak I., Cuzick J., Dowsett M. et al. Prediction of late distant recurrence after 5 years of endocrine treatment: a combined analysis of patients from the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group 8 and Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination randomized trials using the PAM50 risk of recurrence score. J Clin Oncol 2015;33: 916–22.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sestak I., Cuzick J., Dowsett M. et al. Prediction of late distant recurrence after 5 years of endocrine treatment: a combined analysis of patients from the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group 8 and Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination randomized trials using the PAM50 risk of recurrence score. J Clin Oncol 2015;33: 916–22.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">45. Sestak I., Dowsett M., Zabaglo L. et al. Factors predicting late recurrence for estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2013;105:1504–11.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sestak I., Dowsett M., Zabaglo L. et al. Factors predicting late recurrence for estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2013;105:1504–11.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">46. Dubsky P., Brase J.C., Jakesz R. et al. The EndoPredict score provides prognostic information on late distant metastases in ER+/ HER-2– breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 2013;109:2959–64.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dubsky P., Brase J.C., Jakesz R. et al. The EndoPredict score provides prognostic information on late distant metastases in ER+/ HER-2– breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 2013;109:2959–64.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">47. Zhang Y., Schnabel C.A., Schroeder B.E. et al. Breast cancer index identifies early-stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients at risk for earlyand late-distant recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 2013;19: 4196–205.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhang Y., Schnabel C.A., Schroeder B.E. et al. Breast cancer index identifies early-stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients at risk for earlyand late-distant recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 2013;19: 4196–205.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">48. Sledge G.W., Hudis C.A., Swain S.M. et al. ASCO's approach to a learning health care system in oncology. J Oncol Pract 2013;9(3):145–8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sledge G.W., Hudis C.A., Swain S.M. et al. ASCO's approach to a learning health care system in oncology. J Oncol Pract 2013;9(3):145–8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">49. Campbell P. Interpreting genomics data at a functional level: What are we learning from large molecular screening projects? Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):G 2.01.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Campbell P. Interpreting genomics data at a functional level: What are we learning from large molecular screening projects? Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):G 2.01.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">50. Reis-Filho J., Weigelt B. Discrepancies between genetic tools and immunohistochemistry: bad pathology and good signature, and vice-versa. Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):PG 2.03.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Reis-Filho J., Weigelt B. Discrepancies between genetic tools and immunohistochemistry: bad pathology and good signature, and vice-versa. Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):PG 2.03.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">51. Viale G., Slaets L., Bogaerts J. et al. High concordance of protein (by IHC), gene (by FISH; HER2 only), and microarray readout (by TargetPrint) of ER, PgR, and HER2: results from the EORTC 10041/BIG 03-04 MINDACT trial. Ann Oncol 2014;25:816–23.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Viale G., Slaets L., Bogaerts J. et al. High concordance of protein (by IHC), gene (by FISH; HER2 only), and microarray readout (by TargetPrint) of ER, PgR, and HER2: results from the EORTC 10041/BIG 03-04 MINDACT trial. Ann Oncol 2014;25:816–23.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">52. Maisonneuve P., Disalvatore D., Rotmensz N. et al. Proposed new clinicopathological surrogate definitions of luminal A and luminal В (HER-2-negative) intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. Breast Cancer Res 2014;16:R65.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Maisonneuve P., Disalvatore D., Rotmensz N. et al. Proposed new clinicopathological surrogate definitions of luminal A and luminal В (HER-2-negative) intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. Breast Cancer Res 2014;16:R65.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">53. Prat A., Cheang M.C., Martin M. et al. Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor-positive tumor cells within immunohistochemically defined luminal a breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2013;31: 203–9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Prat A., Cheang M.C., Martin M. et al. Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor-positive tumor cells within immunohistochemically defined luminal a breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2013;31: 203–9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B54"><label>54.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">54. Viale G. A bad tumor biomarker is as bad as a bad drug: the gap between genomics data and phenotype to predict response. Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):PG 2.04.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Viale G. A bad tumor biomarker is as bad as a bad drug: the gap between genomics data and phenotype to predict response. Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):PG 2.04.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B55"><label>55.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">55. Prat A., Bianchini G., Thomas M. et al. Research-based PAM50 subtype predictor identifies higher responses and improved survival outcomes in HER2-positive breast cancer in the NOAH study. Clin Cancer Res 2014;20:511–21.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Prat A., Bianchini G., Thomas M. et al. Research-based PAM50 subtype predictor identifies higher responses and improved survival outcomes in HER2-positive breast cancer in the NOAH study. Clin Cancer Res 2014;20:511–21.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B56"><label>56.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">56. Schneeweiss A., Chia S., Hickish T. et al. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in combination with standard neoadjuvant anthracyclinecontaining and anthracycline-free chemotherapy regimens in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a randomized phase II cardiac safety study (TRVPHAENA). Ann Oncol 2013;24: 2278–84.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schneeweiss A., Chia S., Hickish T. et al. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in combination with standard neoadjuvant anthracyclinecontaining and anthracycline-free chemotherapy regimens in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a randomized phase II cardiac safety study (TRVPHAENA). Ann Oncol 2013;24: 2278–84.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B57"><label>57.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">57. Loibl S. Primary systemic therapy for clinicians: medical and research perspectives. Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):PG 8.01.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Loibl S. Primary systemic therapy for clinicians: medical and research perspectives. Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):PG 8.01.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B58"><label>58.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">58. Masuda H., Baggerly K.A., Wang Y. et al. Differential response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy among 7 triple-negative breast cancer molecular subtypes. Clin Cancer Res 2013;19:5533–40.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Masuda H., Baggerly K.A., Wang Y. et al. Differential response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy among 7 triple-negative breast cancer molecular subtypes. Clin Cancer Res 2013;19:5533–40.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B59"><label>59.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">59. Lehmann B.D., Bauer J.A., Chen X. et al. Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies. J Clin Invest 2011;121:2750–67.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lehmann B.D., Bauer J.A., Chen X. et al. Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies. J Clin Invest 2011;121:2750–67.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B60"><label>60.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">60. Adams S., Gray R.J., Demaria S. et al. Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer from two phase III randomized breast cancer trials: ECOG 2197 and ECOG 1199. J Clin Oncol 2014;32(27):2959–66.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Adams S., Gray R.J., Demaria S. et al. Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer from two phase III randomized breast cancer trials: ECOG 2197 and ECOG 1199. J Clin Oncol 2014;32(27):2959–66.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B61"><label>61.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">61. Loibl S. Primary systemic therapy for clinicians: medical and research perspectives. Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):PG 8.01.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Loibl S. Primary systemic therapy for clinicians: medical and research perspectives. Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):PG 8.01.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B62"><label>62.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">62. Perez E.A., Ballman K.V., Anderson S.K. et al. Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (S-TILs): in the alliance N9831 S-TILs are associated with chemotherapy benefit but not associated with trastuzumab benefit. Proc SABCG 2014:S1-06.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Perez E.A., Ballman K.V., Anderson S.K. et al. Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (S-TILs): in the alliance N9831 S-TILs are associated with chemotherapy benefit but not associated with trastuzumab benefit. Proc SABCG 2014:S1-06.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B63"><label>63.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">63. Curigliano G. Immune pathways and immunome as a target. Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):PG 4.02.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Curigliano G. Immune pathways and immunome as a target. Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):PG 4.02.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B64"><label>64.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">64. Herbst R.S., Soria J.C., Kowanetz M. et al. Predictive correlates of response to the antiPD-Ll antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients. Nature 2014;515:563–7.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Herbst R.S., Soria J.C., Kowanetz M. et al. Predictive correlates of response to the antiPD-Ll antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients. Nature 2014;515:563–7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B65"><label>65.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">65. Nanda R., Chow L.Q., Dees E.C. et al. A phase lb study of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2015; Suppl:S1–9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nanda R., Chow L.Q., Dees E.C. et al. A phase lb study of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2015; Suppl:S1–9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B66"><label>66.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">66. Finn R.S., Crown J.P., Lang I. et al. The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbocidib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-l/TRIO18): a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:25–35.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Finn R.S., Crown J.P., Lang I. et al. The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbocidib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-l/TRIO18): a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:25–35.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B67"><label>67.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">67. Byrski T., Huzarski T., Dent R. et al. Pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant cisplatin in BRCAl-positive breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014;147:401–5.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Byrski T., Huzarski T., Dent R. et al. Pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant cisplatin in BRCAl-positive breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014;147:401–5.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B68"><label>68.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">68. Tutt A., Ellis P., Kilbum L.S. et al. TNT: A randomized phase III trial of carboplatin (C) compared with docetaxel (D) for patients with metastatic or recurrent locally advanced triple negative or BRCA1/2 breast cancer (CRUK/07/012). Cancer Res 2014;Suppl:S3-01.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tutt A., Ellis P., Kilbum L.S. et al. TNT: A randomized phase III trial of carboplatin (C) compared with docetaxel (D) for patients with metastatic or recurrent locally advanced triple negative or BRCA1/2 breast cancer (CRUK/07/012). Cancer Res 2014;Suppl:S3-01.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B69"><label>69.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">69. Baselga J. Targeting PIK3CA pathway. Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Baselga J. Targeting PIK3CA pathway. Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B70"><label>70.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">70. Andre F., Bachelot T., Campone M. et al. Targeting FGFR with dovitinib (TKI258): predinical and clinical data in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2013;19:3693–3702.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Andre F., Bachelot T., Campone M. et al. Targeting FGFR with dovitinib (TKI258): predinical and clinical data in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2013;19:3693–3702.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B71"><label>71.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">71. Soria J.C., DeBraud F., Bahleda R. et al. Phase I/IIa study evaluating the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of lucitanib in advanced solid tumors. Ann Oncol 2014;25:2244–51.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Soria J.C., DeBraud F., Bahleda R. et al. Phase I/IIa study evaluating the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of lucitanib in advanced solid tumors. Ann Oncol 2014;25:2244–51.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B72"><label>72.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">72. Phillips K.A., Milne R.L., Rookus M.A. et al. Tamoxifen and risk of contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:3091–9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Phillips K.A., Milne R.L., Rookus M.A. et al. Tamoxifen and risk of contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:3091–9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B73"><label>73.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">73. Hartmann L.C., Degnim A.C., Santen R.J. et al. Atypical hyperplasia of the breast – risk assessment and management options. N Engl J Med 2015;372:78–89.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hartmann L.C., Degnim A.C., Santen R.J. et al. Atypical hyperplasia of the breast – risk assessment and management options. N Engl J Med 2015;372:78–89.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B74"><label>74.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">74. Yi M., Huo L., Koenig K.B. et al. Which threshold for ER positivity? A retrospective study based on 9639 patients. Ann Oncol 2014;25:1004–11.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yi M., Huo L., Koenig K.B. et al. Which threshold for ER positivity? A retrospective study based on 9639 patients. Ann Oncol 2014;25:1004–11.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B75"><label>75.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">75. Feng Q., Zhang Z., Shea M.J. et al. An epigenomic approach to therapy for tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer. Cell Res 2014;24:809–19.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Feng Q., Zhang Z., Shea M.J. et al. An epigenomic approach to therapy for tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer. Cell Res 2014;24:809–19.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B76"><label>76.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">76. Denkert C., Loibl S., Muller B.M. et al. Ki-67 levels as predictive and prognostic parameters in pretherapeutic breast cancer core biopsies: a translational investigation in the neoadjuvant GeparTrio trial. Ann Oncol 2013; 24:2786–93.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Denkert C., Loibl S., Muller B.M. et al. Ki-67 levels as predictive and prognostic parameters in pretherapeutic breast cancer core biopsies: a translational investigation in the neoadjuvant GeparTrio trial. Ann Oncol 2013; 24:2786–93.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B77"><label>77.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">77. Denkert C., von Minckwitz G., Brase J.C. et al. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without carboplatin in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive and triplenegative primary breast cancers. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:983–91.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Denkert C., von Minckwitz G., Brase J.C. et al. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without carboplatin in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive and triplenegative primary breast cancers. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:983–91.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B78"><label>78.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">78. Denkert C. Developing Ki67 as a useful marker. The Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1). PG 7.04.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Denkert C. Developing Ki67 as a useful marker. The Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1). PG 7.04.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B79"><label>79.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">79. Klauschen F., Wienert S., Schmitt W. et al. Standardized Ki-67 diagnostics using automated scoring – clinical validation in the Gepar Trio breast cancer study. Clin Cancer Res 2014.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Klauschen F., Wienert S., Schmitt W. et al. Standardized Ki-67 diagnostics using automated scoring – clinical validation in the Gepar Trio breast cancer study. Clin Cancer Res 2014.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B80"><label>80.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">80. Sikov W.M., Berry D.A., Perou C.M. et al. Impact of the addition of carboplatin and/or bevacizumab to neoadjuvant once-per-week paclitaxel followed by dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide on pathologic complete response rates in stage II to III triple-negative breast cancer: CALGB 40603 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol 2015;33:13–21.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sikov W.M., Berry D.A., Perou C.M. et al. Impact of the addition of carboplatin and/or bevacizumab to neoadjuvant once-per-week paclitaxel followed by dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide on pathologic complete response rates in stage II to III triple-negative breast cancer: CALGB 40603 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol 2015;33:13–21.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B81"><label>81.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">81. von Minckwitz G., Schneeweiss A., Loibl S. et al. Neoadjuvant carboplatin in patients with triple-negative and HER2positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto; GBG 66): a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:747–56.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">von Minckwitz G., Schneeweiss A., Loibl S. et al. Neoadjuvant carboplatin in patients with triple-negative and HER2positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto; GBG 66): a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:747–56.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B82"><label>82.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">82. Guarneri V., Dieci M., Carbognin L. et al. Activity of neoadjuvant lapatinib plus trastuzumabfor early breast cancer according to PIK3CA mutations: pathological complete response (pCR) rate in the CherLOB study and pooled analyss of randomized trials. Proc ESMO 2014. Abstr. 2540.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Guarneri V., Dieci M., Carbognin L. et al. Activity of neoadjuvant lapatinib plus trastuzumabfor early breast cancer according to PIK3CA mutations: pathological complete response (pCR) rate in the CherLOB study and pooled analyss of randomized trials. Proc ESMO 2014. Abstr. 2540.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B83"><label>83.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">83. Loibl S., von Minckwitz G., Schneeweiss A. et al. PIK3CA mutations are associated with lower rates of pathologic complete response to anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) therapy in primary HER-2-overexpressing breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:3212–20.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Loibl S., von Minckwitz G., Schneeweiss A. et al. PIK3CA mutations are associated with lower rates of pathologic complete response to anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) therapy in primary HER-2-overexpressing breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:3212–20.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B84"><label>84.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">84. Majewski I.J., Nuciforo P., Mittempergher L. et al. PIK3CA mutations are associated with decreased benefit to neoadjuvant human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-targeted therapies in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Majewski I.J., Nuciforo P., Mittempergher L. et al. PIK3CA mutations are associated with decreased benefit to neoadjuvant human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-targeted therapies in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B85"><label>85.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">85. Allevi G., Strina C., Andreis D. et al. Increased pathological complete response rate after a long-term neoadjuvant letrozole treatment in postmenopausal oestrogen and/or progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2013;108:1587–92.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Allevi G., Strina C., Andreis D. et al. Increased pathological complete response rate after a long-term neoadjuvant letrozole treatment in postmenopausal oestrogen and/or progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2013;108:1587–92.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B86"><label>86.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">86. Dowsett M., Smith I.E., Ebbs S.R. et al. Prognostic value of Ki67 expression after shortterm presurgical endocrine therapy for primary breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99: 167–70.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dowsett M., Smith I.E., Ebbs S.R. et al. Prognostic value of Ki67 expression after shortterm presurgical endocrine therapy for primary breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99: 167–70.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B87"><label>87.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">87. de Azambuja E., Procter M.J., van Veldhuisen D.J. et al. Trastuzumabassociated cardiac events at 8 years of median follow-up in the Herceptin Adjuvant trial (BIG 1-01). J Clin Oncol 2014;32:2159–65.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">de Azambuja E., Procter M.J., van Veldhuisen D.J. et al. Trastuzumabassociated cardiac events at 8 years of median follow-up in the Herceptin Adjuvant trial (BIG 1-01). J Clin Oncol 2014;32:2159–65.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B88"><label>88.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">88. Piccart-Gebhart M.J., Holmes A.P., Baselga J. et al. First results from the phase III ALTTO trial (BIG 2-06; NCCTG [Alliance] N063D) comparing one year of anti-HER2 therapy with lapatinib alone (L), trastuzumab alone (T), their sequence (T-&gt;L), or their combination (T+L) in the adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC). J Clin Oncol 2014;32(Suppl 15):LBA4.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Piccart-Gebhart M.J., Holmes A.P., Baselga J. et al. First results from the phase III ALTTO trial (BIG 2-06; NCCTG [Alliance] N063D) comparing one year of anti-HER2 therapy with lapatinib alone (L), trastuzumab alone (T), their sequence (T-&gt;L), or their combination (T+L) in the adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC). J Clin Oncol 2014;32(Suppl 15):LBA4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B89"><label>89.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">89. DeMichele A., Yee D., Berry D.A. et al. The neoadjuvant model is still the future for drug development in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2015;21(13):2911–5.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">DeMichele A., Yee D., Berry D.A. et al. The neoadjuvant model is still the future for drug development in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2015;21(13):2911–5.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B90"><label>90.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">90. Whelan T. Evolving standards in breast cancer radiotherapy: who should receive locoregional RT? Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1): PG 10.02.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Whelan T. Evolving standards in breast cancer radiotherapy: who should receive locoregional RT? Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1): PG 10.02.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B91"><label>91.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">91. Yarnold J. Hypofractionated radiotherapy in early breast cancer: clinical, dosimetric and radio-genomic issues. Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):PG 10.01.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yarnold J. Hypofractionated radiotherapy in early breast cancer: clinical, dosimetric and radio-genomic issues. Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):PG 10.01.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B92"><label>92.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">92. Thorsen L.B., Thomsen M.S., Berg M. et al. CT-planned internal mammary node radiotherapy in the DBCG-IMN study: benefit versus potentially harmful effects. Acta Oncol 2014;53:1027–34.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Thorsen L.B., Thomsen M.S., Berg M. et al. CT-planned internal mammary node radiotherapy in the DBCG-IMN study: benefit versus potentially harmful effects. Acta Oncol 2014;53:1027–34.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B93"><label>93.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">93. Davidson N. Endocrine therapy for premenopausal women: type and duration. Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):PG 11.01.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Davidson N. Endocrine therapy for premenopausal women: type and duration. Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):PG 11.01.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B94"><label>94.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">94. Gnant M., Mlineritsch B., Stoeger H. et al. Zoledronic acid combined with adjuvant endocrine therapy of tamoxifene versus anastrozol plus ovarian function suppression in premenopausal early breast cancer: final analysis of the ABCG12 Trial 12. Ann Oncol 2015;26:313–20.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gnant M., Mlineritsch B., Stoeger H. et al. Zoledronic acid combined with adjuvant endocrine therapy of tamoxifene versus anastrozol plus ovarian function suppression in premenopausal early breast cancer: final analysis of the ABCG12 Trial 12. Ann Oncol 2015;26:313–20.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B95"><label>95.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">95. Bernhard J., Luo W., Ribi К. et al. Patient-reported endocrine symptoms, sexual functioning, and quality of life (QoL) in the IBCSG TEXT and SOFT trials: adjuvant treatment with exemestane (E) plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) versus tamoxifen (T) plus OFS in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer (BC). J Clin Oncol 2015;32 (Suppl 15):аbstr. 557.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bernhard J., Luo W., Ribi К. et al. Patient-reported endocrine symptoms, sexual functioning, and quality of life (QoL) in the IBCSG TEXT and SOFT trials: adjuvant treatment with exemestane (E) plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) versus tamoxifen (T) plus OFS in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer (BC). J Clin Oncol 2015;32 (Suppl 15):аbstr. 557.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B96"><label>96.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">96. Ribi K., Luo W., Francis P. et al. Patientreported endocrine symptoms, sexual functioning and quality of life (QoL) in the IBCSG SOFT trial: Adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen (T) alone versus T plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) in premenopausal women with hormone receptorpositive (HR+) early breast cancer (BC). Cancer Res 2014;Suppl:S3-09.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ribi K., Luo W., Francis P. et al. Patientreported endocrine symptoms, sexual functioning and quality of life (QoL) in the IBCSG SOFT trial: Adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen (T) alone versus T plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) in premenopausal women with hormone receptorpositive (HR+) early breast cancer (BC). Cancer Res 2014;Suppl:S3-09.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B97"><label>97.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">97. Tevaarwerk A.J., Wang M., Zhao F. et al. Phase III comparison of tamoxifen versus tamoxifen plus ovarian function suppression in premenopausal women with node-negative, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (E-3193, INT-0142): a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:3948–58.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tevaarwerk A.J., Wang M., Zhao F. et al. Phase III comparison of tamoxifen versus tamoxifen plus ovarian function suppression in premenopausal women with node-negative, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (E-3193, INT-0142): a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:3948–58.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B98"><label>98.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">98. Goodwin P.J. Obesity and insulin: сlinical relevance and research priorities. Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):PG 6.03.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Goodwin P.J. Obesity and insulin: сlinical relevance and research priorities. Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):PG 6.03.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B99"><label>99.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">99. Shulman L.N., Cirrincione C.T., Berry D.A. et al. Six cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide or paclitaxel are not superior to four cycles as adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in women with zero to three positive axillary nodes: Cancer and Leukemia Group В 40101. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:4071–6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shulman L.N., Cirrincione C.T., Berry D.A. et al. Six cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide or paclitaxel are not superior to four cycles as adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in women with zero to three positive axillary nodes: Cancer and Leukemia Group В 40101. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:4071–6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B100"><label>100.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">100. Wolff A.C., Blackford A.L., Visvanathan К. et al. Risk of marrow neoplasms after adjuvant breast cancer therapy: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Experience. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:340–8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wolff A.C., Blackford A.L., Visvanathan К. et al. Risk of marrow neoplasms after adjuvant breast cancer therapy: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Experience. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:340–8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B101"><label>101.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">101. Eckhoff L., Knoop A., Jensen M.B. et al. Persistence of docetaxel-induced neuropathy and impact on quality of life among breast cancer survivors. Eur J Cancer 2015;51: 292–300.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Eckhoff L., Knoop A., Jensen M.B. et al. Persistence of docetaxel-induced neuropathy and impact on quality of life among breast cancer survivors. Eur J Cancer 2015;51: 292–300.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B102"><label>102.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">102. Tolaney S.M., Barry W.T., Dang C.T. et al. Adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab for node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2015;372:134–41.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tolaney S.M., Barry W.T., Dang C.T. et al. Adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab for node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2015;372:134–41.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B103"><label>103.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">103. Pagani О., Ruggeri M., Manunta S. et al. Pregnancy after breast cancer: Are young patients willing to participate in clinical studies? Breast 2015.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pagani О., Ruggeri M., Manunta S. et al. Pregnancy after breast cancer: Are young patients willing to participate in clinical studies? Breast 2015.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B104"><label>104.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">104. Hart C.D., Di Leo A. Defining optimal duration and predicting benefit from chemotherapy in patients with luminal-like subtypes. Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):PG 12.02.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hart C.D., Di Leo A. Defining optimal duration and predicting benefit from chemotherapy in patients with luminal-like subtypes. Breast 2015;24(Suppl 1):PG 12.02.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B105"><label>105.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">105. Davies C., Pan H., Godwin J. et al. Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years after diagnosis of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: ATLAS, a randomised trial. Lancet 2013;381: 805–16.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Davies C., Pan H., Godwin J. et al. Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years after diagnosis of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: ATLAS, a randomised trial. Lancet 2013;381: 805–16.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
