<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Tumors of female reproductive system</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Tumors of female reproductive system</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Опухоли женской репродуктивной системы</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1994-4098</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">1999-8627</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Publishing House ABV Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">999</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17650/1994-4098-2022-18-3-78-88</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>MAMMOLOGY. CLINICAL CASE</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МАММОЛОГИЯ. КЛИНИЧЕСКИЙ СЛУЧАЙ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Significance and possible causes of hormone receptor expression loss in metastatic breast cancer. Phenotypic evolution of luminal <italic>BRCA1</italic>-associated breast cancer to triple negative subtype in lung metastasis and PARP inhibition strategy in early-line therapy</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Фенотипическая эволюция люминального <italic>BRCA1</italic>-ассоциированного рака молочной железы в трижды негативный подтип при метастазировании в легкие и стратегия PARP-ингибирования в ранней линии терапии</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0698-7710</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Stukan</surname><given-names>A. I. </given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Стукань</surname><given-names>А. И.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Anastasiya Igorevna Stukan</p><p>146 <italic>Dimitrova St., Krasnodar 350040</italic></p><p><italic>4 Mitrofana Sedina St., Krasnodar 350063</italic></p><p><italic>68 Leningradskaya St.,  Pesochnyy Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758</italic></p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Анастасия Игоревна Стукань </p><p><italic>350040 Краснодар, ул. Димитрова, 146</italic></p><p><italic>350063 Краснодар, ул. Митрофана Седина, 4</italic></p><p><italic>197758 Санкт-Петербург, пос. Песочный, ул. Ленинградская, 68</italic></p></bio><email>jolie86@bk.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7745-4631</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Khachmamuk</surname><given-names>Z. K. </given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Хачмамук</surname><given-names>З. К.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p><italic>146 Dimitrova St., Krasnodar 350040</italic></p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p><italic>350040 Краснодар, ул. Димитрова, 146</italic></p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0006-3306</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Antipova</surname><given-names>V. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Антипова</surname><given-names>В. В.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p><italic>146 Dimitrova St., Krasnodar 350040</italic></p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p><italic>350040 Краснодар, ул. Димитрова, 146</italic></p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8191-4546</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Dzagashtokova</surname><given-names>A. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Дзагаштокова</surname><given-names>А. В.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p><italic>146 Dimitrova St., Krasnodar 350040</italic></p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p><italic>350040 Краснодар, ул. Димитрова, 146</italic></p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Clinical Oncology Dispensary No. 1, Ministry of Health of Krasnodar Region</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ГБУЗ «Клинический онкологический диспансер № 1» Министерства здравоохранения Краснодарского края</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Kuban State Medical University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБОУ ВО «Кубанский государственный медицинский университет»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff3"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Onclology, Ministry of Health of Russia</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр онкологии им. Н.Н. Петрова» Минздрава России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2022-12-02" publication-format="electronic"><day>02</day><month>12</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>78</fpage><lpage>88</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2022-12-02"><day>02</day><month>12</month><year>2022</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2022-12-02"><day>02</day><month>12</month><year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://ojrs.abvpress.ru/ojrs/article/view/999">https://ojrs.abvpress.ru/ojrs/article/view/999</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Current clinical recommendations indicate the need for a biopsy of a metastatic focus in metastatic breast cancer (BC), but the optimal frequency of additional molecular analysis remains unclear. The discordance of hormonal receptors (HR) between the primary tumor and metastatic foci has prognostic significance, while the transition from HR-positive BC to a triple negative phenotype is associated with a worse clinical prognosis. Acquisition of HR expression in primary triple negative BC is more favorable due to the wide range of options for HR-positive BC treatment. Over the past few years, PARP inhibitors have become an important therapeutic option for the treatment of various tumor types, including BC and luminal surrogate subtypes. However, some questions still remain unresolved, the most important of which are: what is the optimal sequence of the use of CDK4 / 6 inhibitors as part of combined hormone therapy and PARP inhibitors in luminal types of <italic>BRCA</italic>-associated BC and how effective is the strategy of PARP inhibition after the use of combined hormone therapy with CDK4 / 6 inhibitors? It is obvious that the answers to the questions can be partially obtained by performing a biopsy of the most clinically significant metastatic focus and selecting therapy according to the phenotypic surrogate subtype. A clinical case of the phenotypic evolution of HR-positive <italic>BRCA1</italic>-associated BC into a triple negative phenotype during metastasis to the lungs and the luminal phenotype of tumor metastasis in soft tissues is presented. Biopsy of the most clinically significant metastatic lesion in the lungs in this case changed the strategy of early-line therapy for estrogen-receptor-positive disease, when in the absence of a biopsy, a combined hormone therapy regimen with CDK4 / 6 inhibitors could be applied. At the same time, the strategy of using PARP inhibitor talazoparib, which has shown efficacy in all surrogate subtypes, should certainly be prescribed in the early line of therapy for <italic>BRCA</italic>-associated disease with loss of estrogen receptor expression. Despite the luminal phenotype of metastasis in the soft tissues of the back and the unknown status of bone metastases, the drug demonstrates efficacy in these cases as well. It should be noted that partial response according on RECIST 1.1 months with an improvement in the quality of life and the disappearance of pain syndrome was evaluated after 10 weeks of treatment. The response duration was an unprecedented 10 months.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Современные клинические рекомендации указывают на необходимость биопсии метастатического очага при раке молочной железы (РМЖ), однако оптимальная частота повторного молекулярного анализа остается неясной. Различие статуса гормональных рецепторов (ГР) между первичной опухолью и метастатическими очагами имеет прогностическое значение, при этом переход от ГР-положительного РМЖ к трижды негативному фенотипу ассоциируется с худшим клиническим прогнозом. Приобретение экспрессии гР при первичном трижды негативном РМЖ более благоприятно ввиду широкого спектра опций терапии ГР-положительного РМЖ. за последние несколько лет PARP-ингибиторы стали важной терапевтической опцией терапии различных типов опухолей, включая РМЖ, в том числе и при люминальных подтипах опухоли. Однако некоторые вопросы все еще остаются нерешенными, самые главные из которых – какова оптимальная последовательность применения CDK4 / 6-ингибиторов в составе комбинированной гормональной терапии и PARP-ингибиторов при люминальных типах <italic>BRCA</italic>-ассоциированного РМЖ и насколько эффективна стратегия PARP-ингибирования после применения комбинированной гормонотерапии совместно с CDK4 / 6-ингибиторами. Очевидно, что ответы на эти вопросы могут частично быть получены при выполнении биопсии наиболее клинически значимого метастатического очага с подбором терапии согласно фенотипическому суррогатному подтипу. В статье представлен клинический случай фенотипической эволюции ГР-положительного <italic>BRCA1</italic>-ассоциированного РМЖ в трижды негативный фенотип при метастазировании в легкие, но с люминальным фенотипом метастаза опухоли в мягких тканях. биопсия наиболее клинически значимого очага в легких в данном случае с учетом наличия <italic>BRCA1</italic>-мутации поменяла стратегию ранней линии терапии эстрогенрецептор-положительного заболевания, когда в отсутствие биопсии легких мог быть применен режим комбинированной гормонотерапии с CDK4 / 6-ингибитором. При этом стратегия применения PARP-ингибитора талазопариба, который показал эффективность вне зависимости от суррогатного подтипа, безусловно, должна быть применена в ранней линии терапии <italic>BRCA</italic>-ассоциированного заболевания с утратой экспрессии рецепторов к эстрогену. Несмотря на люминальный фенотип метастаза в мягких тканях спины и неизвестный статус костных метастазов, препарат демонстрирует эффективность в отношении и этих очагов. Необходимо отметить, что установлены частичный ответ по критериям RECIST 1.1, улучшение общесоматического статуса пациентки, качества жизни и исчезновение болевого синдрома через 10 нед терапии. Продолжительность ответа при этом составила беспрецедентные 10 мес.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>estrogen receptor alpha</kwd><kwd>progesterone receptors</kwd><kwd>loss of estrogen receptor expression</kwd><kwd>luminal phenotype</kwd><kwd><italic>BRCA1</italic>-associated breast cancer</kwd><kwd>PARP inhibitor</kwd><kwd>talazoparib</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>эстрогеновый рецептор альфа</kwd><kwd>рецепторы к прогестерону</kwd><kwd>утрата экспрессии эстрогеновых рецепторов</kwd><kwd>люминальный фенотип</kwd><kwd><italic>BRCA1</italic>-ассоциированный рак молочной железы</kwd><kwd>PARP-ингибитор</kwd><kwd>талазопариб</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">1.	Aurilio G., Disalvatore D., Pruneri G. et al. A meta-analysis of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 discordance between primary breast cancer and metastases. Eur J Cancer 2014;50:277–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.10.004</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aurilio G., Disalvatore D., Pruneri G. et al. A meta-analysis of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 discordance between primary breast cancer and metastases. Eur J Cancer 2014;50:277–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.10.004</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">2.	Schrijver W.A., Suijkerbuijk K.P., van Gils C.H. et al. Receptor conversion in distant breast cancer metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2018;110:568–80. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx273</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schrijver W.A., Suijkerbuijk K.P., van Gils C.H. et al. Receptor conversion in distant breast cancer metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2018;110:568–80. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx273</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">3.	Howell A. Current status of adjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal patients with primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2007;9:S1. DOI: 10.1186/bcr1695</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Howell A. Current status of adjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal patients with primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2007;9:S1. DOI: 10.1186/bcr1695</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">4.	Galli G., Bregni G., Cavalieri S. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy exerts selection pressure towards luminal phenotype breast cancer. Breast Care 2017;12:391–4. DOI: 10.1159/000479582</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galli G., Bregni G., Cavalieri S. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy exerts selection pressure towards luminal phenotype breast cancer. Breast Care 2017;12:391–4. DOI: 10.1159/000479582</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">5.	Simmons C., Miller N., Geddie W. et al. Does confirmatory tumor biopsy alter the management of breast cancer patients with distant metastases? Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol 2009;20: 1499–504. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdp028</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Simmons C., Miller N., Geddie W. et al. Does confirmatory tumor biopsy alter the management of breast cancer patients with distant metastases? Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol 2009;20: 1499–504. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdp028</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">6.	Zattarin E., Leporati R., Ligorio F. Hormone receptor loss in breast cancer: molecular mechanisms, clinical settings, and therapeutic implications. Cells 2020;9:2644. DOI: 10.3390/cells91226441-23</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zattarin E., Leporati R., Ligorio F. Hormone receptor loss in breast cancer: molecular mechanisms, clinical settings, and therapeutic implications. Cells 2020;9:2644. DOI: 10.3390/cells91226441-23</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">7.	Aurilio G., Disalvatore D., Pruneri G. et al. A meta-analysis of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 discordance between primary breast cancer and metastases. Eur J Cancer 2014;50:277–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.10.004</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aurilio G., Disalvatore D., Pruneri G. et al. A meta-analysis of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 discordance between primary breast cancer and metastases. Eur J Cancer 2014;50:277–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.10.004</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">8.	Dieci M.V., Barbieri E., Piacentini F. et al. Discordance in receptor status between primary and recurrent breast cancer has a prognostic impact: a single-institution analysis. Ann Oncol 2013;24:101–8. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds248</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dieci M.V., Barbieri E., Piacentini F. et al. Discordance in receptor status between primary and recurrent breast cancer has a prognostic impact: a single-institution analysis. Ann Oncol 2013;24:101–8. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds248</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">9.	Kuukasjärvi T., Kononen J., Helin H. et al. Loss of estrogen receptor in recurrent breast cancer is associated with poor response to endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:2584–9. DOI: 10.1200/jco.1996.14.9.2584</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kuukasjärvi T., Kononen J., Helin H. et al. Loss of estrogen receptor in recurrent breast cancer is associated with poor response to endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:2584–9. DOI: 10.1200/jco.1996.14.9.2584</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">10.	Lower E.E., Glass E.L., Bradley D.A. et al. Impact of metastatic estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status on survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005;90:65–70. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-004-2756-z</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lower E.E., Glass E.L., Bradley D.A. et al. Impact of metastatic estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status on survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005;90:65–70. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-004-2756-z</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">11.	Stueber T.N., Weiss C.R., Woeckel A. et al. Influences of adjuvant treatments in hormone receptor positive breast cancer on receptor conversion in recurrent breast cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2019;299:533–41. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-018-4954-7</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stueber T.N., Weiss C.R., Woeckel A. et al. Influences of adjuvant treatments in hormone receptor positive breast cancer on receptor conversion in recurrent breast cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2019;299:533–41. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-018-4954-7</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">12.	Paolillo C., Mu Z., Rossi G. et al. Detection of activating estrogen receptor gene (ESR1) mutations in single circulating tumor cells. Clin Cancer Res 2017;23:6086–93. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-1173</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Paolillo C., Mu Z., Rossi G. et al. Detection of activating estrogen receptor gene (ESR1) mutations in single circulating tumor cells. Clin Cancer Res 2017;23:6086–93. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-1173</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">13.	Peterson L.M., Kurland B.F., Schubert E.K. et al. A phase 2 study of 16-[18F]-fluoro-17-estradiol positron emission tomography (FES-PET) as a marker of hormone sensitivity in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Mol Imaging Biol 2014;16:431–40. DOI: 10.1007/s11307-013-0699-7</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Peterson L.M., Kurland B.F., Schubert E.K. et al. A phase 2 study of 16-[18F]-fluoro-17-estradiol positron emission tomography (FES-PET) as a marker of hormone sensitivity in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Mol Imaging Biol 2014;16:431–40. DOI: 10.1007/s11307-013-0699-7</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">14.	Linden H.M., Stekhova S.A., Link J.M. et al. Quantitative fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography imaging predicts response to endocrine treatment in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2793–9. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.04.3810</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Linden H.M., Stekhova S.A., Link J.M. et al. Quantitative fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography imaging predicts response to endocrine treatment in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2793–9. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.04.3810</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">15. Jeselsohn R., Buchwalter G., De Angelis C. et al. ESR1 mutations – a mechanism for acquired endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2015;12:573–83. DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.117</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jeselsohn R., Buchwalter G., De Angelis C. et al. ESR1 mutations – a mechanism for acquired endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2015;12:573–83. DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.117</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">16.	Zheng W.Q., Zheng J.M., Lu J. et al. Loss of heterozygosity of ER gene in breast cancer and its clinical significance. Chin J Cancer Res 2002;14:122–5. DOI: 10.1007/s11670-002-0027-2</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zheng W.Q., Zheng J.M., Lu J. et al. Loss of heterozygosity of ER gene in breast cancer and its clinical significance. Chin J Cancer Res 2002;14:122–5. DOI: 10.1007/s11670-002-0027-2</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">17.	Herynk M.H., Fuqua S.A.W. Estrogen receptors in resistance to hormone therapy. Adv Exp Med Biol 2007;608:130–43. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-74039-3_10</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Herynk M.H., Fuqua S.A.W. Estrogen receptors in resistance to hormone therapy. Adv Exp Med Biol 2007;608:130–43. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-74039-3_10</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">18.	Lapidus R.G., Nass S.J., Davidson N.E. The loss of estrogen and progesterone receptor gene expression in human breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 1998;3:85–94. DOI: 10.1023/a:1018778403001</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lapidus R.G., Nass S.J., Davidson N.E. The loss of estrogen and progesterone receptor gene expression in human breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 1998;3:85–94. DOI: 10.1023/a:1018778403001</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">19.	Mohammed H., Russell I.A., Stark R. et al. Progesterone receptor modulates ERα action in breast cancer. Nature 2015;523:313–7. DOI: 10.1038/nature14583</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mohammed H., Russell I.A., Stark R. et al. Progesterone receptor modulates ERα action in breast cancer. Nature 2015;523:313–7. DOI: 10.1038/nature14583</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">20.	Cui X., Schiff R., Arpino G. et al. Biology of progesterone receptor loss in breast cancer and its implications for endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:7721–35. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.09.004</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cui X., Schiff R., Arpino G. et al. Biology of progesterone receptor loss in breast cancer and its implications for endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:7721–35. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.09.004</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">21.	Tomlinson I.P.M., Nicolai H., Solomon E. et al. The frequency and mechanism of loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 11q in breast cancer. J Pathol 1996;180:38–43. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9896(199609)180:1&lt;38::aid-path638&gt;3.0.co;2-c</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tomlinson I.P.M., Nicolai H., Solomon E. et al. The frequency and mechanism of loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 11q in breast cancer. J Pathol 1996;180:38–43. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9896(199609)180:1&lt;38::aid-path638&gt;3.0.co;2-c</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">22.	Kangaspeska S., Stride B., Métivier R. et al. Transient cyclical methylation of promoter DNA. Nature 2008;452:112–5. DOI: 10.1038/nature06640</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kangaspeska S., Stride B., Métivier R. et al. Transient cyclical methylation of promoter DNA. Nature 2008;452:112–5. DOI: 10.1038/nature06640</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">23.	Archey W.B., McEachern K.A., Robson M. CpG methylation of the estrogen receptor gene in BRCA1-linked estrogen receptornegative breast cancer. Oncogene 2002;21(46):7034–41 DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205844</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Archey W.B., McEachern K.A., Robson M. CpG methylation of the estrogen receptor gene in BRCA1-linked estrogen receptornegative breast cancer. Oncogene 2002;21(46):7034–41 DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205844</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">24.	Yang X., Phillips D.L., Ferguson A.T. et al. Synergistic activation of functional estrogen receptor (ER)-α by DNA methyltransferase and histone deacetylase inhibition in human ER-α-negative breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 2001;61:7025–9. DOI: 10.1023/a:1026146524737</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yang X., Phillips D.L., Ferguson A.T. et al. Synergistic activation of functional estrogen receptor (ER)-α by DNA methyltransferase and histone deacetylase inhibition in human ER-α-negative breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 2001;61:7025–9. DOI: 10.1023/a:1026146524737</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">25.	Tsuboi K., Nagatomo T., Gohno T. et al. Single CpG site methylation controls estrogen receptor gene transcription and correlates with hormone therapy resistance. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2017;171:209–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.04.001</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tsuboi K., Nagatomo T., Gohno T. et al. Single CpG site methylation controls estrogen receptor gene transcription and correlates with hormone therapy resistance. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2017;171:209–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.04.001</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">26.	Zhang J., Zhou C., Jiang H. et al. ZEB1 induces ERα promoter hypermethylation and confers antiestrogen resistance in breast cancer. Cell Death Dis 2017;8:e2732. DOI: 10.1038/cddis.2017.154</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhang J., Zhou C., Jiang H. et al. ZEB1 induces ERα promoter hypermethylation and confers antiestrogen resistance in breast cancer. Cell Death Dis 2017;8:e2732. DOI: 10.1038/cddis.2017.154</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">27.	Montemurro F., Di Cosimo S., Arpino G. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and hormone receptorpositive breast cancer: new insights into molecular interactions and clinical implications. Ann Oncol 2013;24:2715–24. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt287</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Montemurro F., Di Cosimo S., Arpino G. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and hormone receptorpositive breast cancer: new insights into molecular interactions and clinical implications. Ann Oncol 2013;24:2715–24. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt287</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">28.	Zhou Y., Eppenberger-Castori S., Eppenberger U. et al. The NFB pathway and endocrine-resistant breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 2005;12:S37–46. DOI: 10.1677/erc.1.00977</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhou Y., Eppenberger-Castori S., Eppenberger U. et al. The NFB pathway and endocrine-resistant breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 2005;12:S37–46. DOI: 10.1677/erc.1.00977</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">29.	Zhou Y., Eppenberger-Castori S., Marx C. et al. Activation of nuclear factor-B (NFB) identifies a high-risk subset of hormonedependent breast cancers. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2005;37:1130– 44. DOI: 10.1677/erc.1.00977</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhou Y., Eppenberger-Castori S., Marx C. et al. Activation of nuclear factor-B (NFB) identifies a high-risk subset of hormonedependent breast cancers. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2005;37:1130– 44. DOI: 10.1677/erc.1.00977</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">30.	Holloway J.N., Murthy S., El-Ashry D. A cytoplasmic substrate of mitogen-activated protein kinase is responsible for estrogen recep tor-down-regulation in breast cancer cells: The role of nuclear factor-B. Mol Endocrinol 2004;18:1396–410. DOI: 10.1210/me.2004-0048</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Holloway J.N., Murthy S., El-Ashry D. A cytoplasmic substrate of mitogen-activated protein kinase is responsible for estrogen recep tor-down-regulation in breast cancer cells: The role of nuclear factor-B. Mol Endocrinol 2004;18:1396–410. DOI: 10.1210/me.2004-0048</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">31.	Pianetti S., Arsura M., Romieu-Mourez R. et al. HER-2/neu overexpression induces NF-B via a PI3-kinase/Akt pathway involving calpain-mediated degradation of IB – that can be inhibited by the tumor suppressor PTEN. Oncogene 2001;20:1287–99. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204257</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pianetti S., Arsura M., Romieu-Mourez R. et al. HER-2/neu overexpression induces NF-B via a PI3-kinase/Akt pathway involving calpain-mediated degradation of IB – that can be inhibited by the tumor suppressor PTEN. Oncogene 2001;20:1287–99. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204257</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
