Assessment of ERBB2 and HER2 expression in metastatic breast cancer using the nCounter® system and a 100-gene scale
https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2023-19-3-30-36
Abstract
Background. Individual molecular characteristics of a tumor can serve as a basis for a tailored approach to therapy, prediction of the disease course and outcome, and timely treatment correction in cancer patients. Tumor genomic profiling allows for a more precise tumor assessment in an individual manner. Accurate identification of the HER2 status of a breast tumor is crucial for clinical decisions and appropriate treatment strategy.
Aim. To increase the efficacy of systemic therapy for breast cancer, reduce inappropriate prescribing, and ensure a tailored approach to systemic breast cancer therapy using the information on individual molecular characteristics of the tumor.
Materials and methods. We explored the expression of 100 genes involved in breast cancer development in 106 tumor samples from patients with metastatic breast cancer. We used the nCounter technology based on direct digital target detection using color-coded molecular barcodes. We analyzed the expression of 28 genes with a high predictive value for breast cancer.
Results. The nCounter technology allowed us to perform semiquantitative assessment of the expression of 28 genes in tumor tissue samples. We compared the expression of ERBB2 and HER2. The HER2 expression between 252.32 and 6000 barcodes was equivalent to HER2 (0) status; between 6000 and 9196.25 barcodes, to HER2 (1+); between 9196.25 and 15022.46, to HER2 (2+/ISH±); and 15022.46 barcodes, to HER2 (3+). In case of HER2 (3+) and ERBB2 below 6000 barcodes, the result was considered false positive. In case of HER2 (0) or (1+) and ERBB2 above 15 000 barcodes, the result was considered false negative. In 18 tumors, the discrepancies in the results meant two principally different breast cancer subtypes requiring different treatments; in 2 cases, the discrepancies were in the level of HER2 expression.
Conclusion. HER2 testing should be performed on an excision sample (ideally on the same block that was used for genomic testing). Despite the correlation between the HER2-enriched molecular class and the response to anti-HER2 therapy, the final result on HER2 status in discordant cases should be based on currently approved assays after results validation.
Keywords
About the Authors
R. M. PaltuevRussian Federation
Ruslan Malikovich Paltuev
56 Prospekt Veteranov, Saint Petersburg 198255;
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
O. A. Volynshchikova
Russian Federation
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
Sh. R. Abdullaeva
Russian Federation
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
S. N. Aleksakhina
Russian Federation
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
A. S. Artemyeva
Russian Federation
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
E. A. Baychorov
Russian Federation
82а Oktyabrskaya St., Stavropol 355047
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
S. Yu. Bakharev
Russian Federation
110k Zmeinogorskiy Trakt, Barnaul 656045
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
Yu. A. Belaya
Russian Federation
40 Kalina St., Khanty-Mansiysk 628011
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
A. A. Bozhok
Russian Federation
2 Litovskaya St., Saint Petersburg 194100
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
V. A. Vasin
Russian Federation
5 Lyubimova St., Ivanovo 153040
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
V. I. Vladimirov
Russian Federation
31 Prospekt Kalinina, Pyatigorsk 357502
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
A. Yu. Vorontsov
Russian Federation
11 / 1 Delovaya St., Nizhny Novgorod 603093
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
E. A. Gaysina
Russian Federation
32 Barnaulskaya St., Tyumen 625041
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
A. A. Gofman
Russian Federation
110k Zmeinogorskiy Trakt, Barnaul 656045
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
V. N. Dmitriev
Russian Federation
1 Kuybysheva St., Belgorod 308010
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
E. N. Imyanitov
Russian Federation
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
V. V. Klimenko
Russian Federation
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
A. V. Komyakhov
Russian Federation
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
M. M. Konstantinova
Russian Federation
56 Prospekt Veteranov, Saint Petersburg 198255
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
M. V. Kopp
Russian Federation
227 Chapaevskaya St., Samara 443001
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
A. G. Kudaybergenova
Russian Federation
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
I. A. Lalak
Russian Federation
182а Oktyabrskaya St., Stavropol 355047
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
D. L. Matevosyan
Russian Federation
31 Prospekt Kalinina, Pyatigorsk 357502
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
N. M. Mudzhiri
Russian Federation
80 Volokolamskoe Shosse, Moscow 125367
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
O. V. Poltareva
Russian Federation
5 Lyubimova St., Ivanovo 153040
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
O. I. Sevryukova
Russian Federation
182а Oktyabrskaya St., Stavropol 355047
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
V. F. Semiglazov
Russian Federation
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
T. Yu. Semiglazova
Russian Federation
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
M. M. Urezkova
Russian Federation
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
A. S. Chichkanova
Russian Federation
11 / 1 Delovaya St., Nizhny Novgorod 603093
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
L. A. Churilova
Russian Federation
110k Zmeinogorskiy Trakt, Barnaul 656045
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
M. V. Shomova
Russian Federation
11 Sportivnaya St., Ryazan 390011
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
References
1. Bertucci F., Finetti P., Cervera N. Gene expression profiling and clinical outcome in breast cancer. J Int Biology 2006;4(10):429–43. DOI: 10.1089/omi.2006.10.429
2. Cowin P.A., Anglesio M., Etemadmoghadam D. Profiling the cancer genome. Ann Rev Gen Hum Genet 2010;11:133–59. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141536
3. Van de Vijver M.J. Molecular tests as prognostic factors in breast cancer. Virchows Arch 2014;464(3):283–91. DOI: 10.1007/s00428-014-1539-0
4. Hurvitz S.A., Gonçalves A., Rugo H.S. Talazoparib in patients with a germline BRCA-mutated advanced breast cancer: detailed safety analyses from the phase III EMBRACA Trial. Oncologist 2020;25(3):439–50. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0493
5. Paltuev R.M., Aleksakhina S.N., Artemyeva A.S. et al. Predictive multigenic scale. Analysis of own results in metastatic breast cancer. Opukholi zhenskoy reproduktivnoy systemy = Tumors of female reproductive system 2023;19(1):69–81. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/1994-4098-2023-19-1-69-81
6. Modi Sh., Jacot W., Yamashita T. et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-low advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2022;387(1):9–20. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2203690
7. Schettini F., Chic N., Brasó-Maristany F. et al. Clinical, pathological, and PAM50 gene expression features of HER2-low breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2021;7(1):1. DOI: 10.1038/s41523-020-00208-2
8. Rakha E.A., Tan P.H., Quinn C. et al. UK recommendations for HER2 assessment in breast cancer: an update. J Clin Pathol 2023;76(4):217–27. DOI: 10.1136/jcp-2022-20863
9. Martinez-Sáez O., Chic N., Pascual T. et al. Frequency and spectrum of PIK3CA somatic mutations in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2020;22(1):45. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-020-01284-9
10. Perez-Fidalgo J.A., Criscitiello C., Carrasco E. et al. A phase III trial of alpelisib + trastuzumab ± fulvestrant versus trastuzumab + chemotherapy in HER2+ PIK3CA-mutated breast cancer. Future Oncol 2022;18(19):2339–49. DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-0045
Review
For citations:
Paltuev R.M., Volynshchikova .A., Abdullaeva .R., Aleksakhina S.N., Artemyeva .S., Baychorov .A., Bakharev S.Yu., Belaya Yu.A., Bozhok .A., Vasin .A., Vladimirov V. ., Vorontsov A.Yu., Gaysina E. ., Gofman A.A., Dmitriev .N., Imyanitov .N., Klimenko .V., Komyakhov A.V., Konstantinova M.M., Kopp M.V., Kudaybergenova A.G., Lalak .A., Matevosyan D.L., Mudzhiri N.M., Poltareva O.V., Sevryukova .I., Semiglazov V.F., Semiglazova T.Yu., Urezkova M.M., Chichkanova A.S., Churilova L.A., Shomova M.V. Assessment of ERBB2 and HER2 expression in metastatic breast cancer using the nCounter® system and a 100-gene scale. Tumors of female reproductive system. 2023;19(3):30-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2023-19-3-30-36