Preview

Tumors of female reproductive system

Advanced search

Assessment of the efficiency and safety of additional irradiation of the tumor bed using electrons or high-dose brachytherapy in patients with breast cancer

https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2025-21-2-26-33

Abstract

Aim. To evaluate the efficacy of interstitial high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDRB) or irradiation by electron as the methods for delivering boost to the tumor bed.

Materials and methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of 5-year local control after whole breast irradiation and additional boost delivery to the tumor bed by HDRB or by electrons. In 485 breast cancer patients included in the analysis HDRB boost was performed in 247, by electrons – in another 238 women.

Results. In 485 evaluated patients, local recurrences were diagnosed in 22 (4.5 %) cases: in 10 (4.0 %) of 247 women after HDRB boost and in 12 (5.0 %) of 238 patients who received a boost by electrons (р = 0.536). We found that age less than 50 years and aggressive subtypes (triple-negative, HER2+, luminal B HER2+) were associated with an increased risk of local recurrence (р = 0.003 and р = 0.004, respectively). The type of boost delivery (HDRB vs. electrons) does not influence the probability of local control in young women (р = 0.547) or in patients with aggressive subtypes of breast cancer. Conclusion. Both techniques of boost delivery (HDRB or electrons) are equally effective in prevention of local recurrence.

About the Authors

T. S. Yaganova
N. N. Petrov National Medical Research Oncology Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Tatyana Sergeevna Yaganova

8 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



S. N. Novikov
N. N. Petrov National Medical Research Oncology Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

8 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



Zh. V. Bryantseva
N. N. Petrov National Medical Research Oncology Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

8 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



I. A. Akulova
N. N. Petrov National Medical Research Oncology Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

8 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



M. Yu. Popova
N. N. Petrov National Medical Research Oncology Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

8 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



References

1. Li T., Zhang P., Zhang Y. et al. Efficacy of breast-conserving surgery versus modified radical surgery in the treatment of early breast cancer: A meta-analysis. Altern Ther Health Med 2025;31(1):238–45.

2. Veronesi U., Cascinelli N., Mariani L. et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347(16):1227–32. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa020989

3. Trofimova O.P. Strategy of radiation therapy in organ-preserving treatment of patients with breast cancer. Moscow, 2015. (In Russ.).

4. Bodet M.L., Roosen A., Hequet D. et al. Therapeutic de-escalation in breast cancer surgery. Bull Cancer 2021;108(12):1145–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2021.06.017

5. Clarke M., Collins R., Darby S. et al. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: An overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 2005;366(9503):2087–106. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67887-7

6. Holland R., Connolly J.L., Gelman R. et al. The presence of an extensive intraductal component following a limited excision correlates with prominent residual disease in the remainder of the breast. J Clin Oncol 1990;8(1):113–8. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.1.113

7. Bartelink H., Maingon P., Poortmans P. et al. Whole-breast irradiation with or without a boost for patients treated with breast- conserving surgery for early breast cancer: 20-year follow-up of a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015;16(1):47–56. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71156-8. Erratum in: Lancet Oncol 2015;16(1):e6.

8. Poortmans P., Bartelink H., Horiot J.C. et al. The influence of the boost technique on local control in breast conserving treatment in the EORTC “boost versus no boost” randomised trial. Radiother Oncol 2004;72(1):25–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.03.007

9. Vrieling C., van Werkhoven E., Maingon P. et al. Prognostic factors for local control in breast cancer after long-term follow-up in the EORTC boost vs no boost trial: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2017;3(1):42–8. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3031

10. Polo A., Polgar C., Hannoun-Leviet J.-M. et al. Risk factors and state-of-the-art indications for boost irradiation in invasive breast carcinoma. Brachytherapy 2017;(16):552–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.03.003

11. Pierquin B., Wilson J.F., Chassagne D. The Paris system modern brachytherapy. Masson Pubklishing USA Inc., 1987.

12. Bryanceva Zh.V., Akulova I.A., Novikov S.N. et al. Interstitial brachytherapy with high dose rate sources in the treatment of patients with breast cancer. Luchevaya diagnostika, luchevaya terapiya = Radiation Diagnostics, Radiation Therapy 2019;2(4):26–34. (In Russ.).

13. Yaganova T.S., Bryanceva Zh.V., Akulova I.A. et al. Comparative analysis of the relationship between dosimetric parameters and technical aspects of interstitial catheter installation during additional irradiation of the removed tumor bed in patients with breast cancer. Vestnik Rossiyskogo nauchnogo tsentra rentgenoradiologii = Bulletin of the Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenology and Radiology 2024;(4):142–9. (In Russ.).

14. Voogd A.C., Nielsen M., Peterse J.L. et al. Differences in risk factors for local and distant recurrence after breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy for stage I and II breast cancer: Pooled results of two large European randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 2001;19(6):1688–97. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.6.1688. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol 2001;19(9):2583.

15. Verhoeven K., Kindts I., Laenen A. et al. A comparison of three different radiotherapy boost techniques after breast conserving therapy for breast cancer. Breast 2015;24:391–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.03.003


Review

For citations:


Yaganova T.S., Novikov S.N., Bryantseva Zh.V., Akulova I.A., Popova M.Yu. Assessment of the efficiency and safety of additional irradiation of the tumor bed using electrons or high-dose brachytherapy in patients with breast cancer. Tumors of female reproductive system. 2025;21(2):26-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2025-21-2-26-33

Views: 10


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-4098 (Print)
ISSN 1999-8627 (Online)