Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with hormone-sensitive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer receiving ribociclib in combination with endocrine therapy or combination chemotherapy in routine clinical practice in the Russian Federation: interim results of the ValerEE study
https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2025-21-3-33-49
Abstract
In this article, we report the interim results of a prospective non-interventional ValerEE study analyzing the efficacy and safety of ribociclib therapy in combination with endocrine therapy compared to other combination chemotherapy regimens in the first-line treatment of patients with hormone-sensitive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer in routine clinical practice in Russia. We analyzed the data of 188 patients, of whom 146 patients received ribociclib in combination with endocrine therapy, while 27 patients received other combination chemotherapy. Fifteen patients were excluded from the analysis as they did not meet the inclusion criteria (received monochemotherapy). The majority of participants were women (99.4 %) with a mean age of 59.1 years; most of them (76.9 %) reached menopause. Mastectomy with lymphadenectomy were the most common surgeries (47.4 % of cases). Ductal cancer was diagnosed in 83.2 % of patients. Expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors was detected in 100 % and 89.6 % of participants, respectively. Metastases were primarily located in the bones (60.7 %), lungs (53.8 %) and liver (50.3 %). Anastrozole was the most common endocrine agent used in combination with ribociclib (65.8 %); paclitaxel plus carboplatin were the most common (33.3 %) combination chemotherapy. The ratio of therapeutic options observed in this study reflects current clinical recommendations and routine clinical practice in the Russian Federation. Patient groups were well balanced with no significant differences between them, which will ensure accurate assessment of the effectiveness of different therapeutic regimens later.
About the Authors
L. G. ZhukovaRussian Federation
Lyudmila Grigoryevna Zhukova
86 Shosse Enthuziastov, Moscow 111123
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
E. V. Artamonova
Russian Federation
23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
1 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997
61 / 2 Schepkina St., Moscow 129110
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
L. Yu. Vladimirova
Russian Federation
63 14-ya Liniya St., Rostov-on-Don 344037
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
T. V. Vinogradova
Russian Federation
29 Soboleva St., Ekaterinburg 620036
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
L. M. Voronkova
Russian Federation
77A Markusa St., Vladikavkaz 362002
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
R. S. Zhikhorev
Russian Federation
6 Staropetrovskiy Proezd, Moscow 125130
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
N. V. Leushina
Russian Federation
102 Lenina St., Izhevsk 426009
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
O. V. Mironov
Russian Federation
29B Moskovskaya St., Tambov 392000
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
V. А. Reznikov
Russian Federation
70 Leningradskiy Prospekt, Moscow 125315
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
E. V. Semenov
Russian Federation
1 Partizana Zheleznyaka St., Krasnoyarsk 660022
16 1-ya Smolenskaya St., Krasnoyarsk 660133
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Gennari A., André F., Barrios C.H. et al. ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2021;32(12):1475–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.019
2. Breast Cancer. Clinical Guidelines. Available at: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/preview-cr/379_4. (In Russ.).
3. Tyulyandin S.A., Artamonova E.V., Zhigulev A.N. et al. Breast cancer. Zlokachestvennye opukholi = Malignant Tumors 2023;13(3s2–1):157–200. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18027/2224-5057-2023-13-3s2-1-157-200
4. George M.A., Qureshi S., Omene C. et al. Clinical and pharmacologic differences of CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer. Front Oncol 2021;11:693104. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.693104
5. Lam S.Y., Liu W.S., Lee C.-S. A review of CDK4/6 inhibitors. US Pharm 2020;45(5)(Specialty & Oncology Suppl):3–8. Available at: https://www.uspharmacist.com/article/a-review-of-cdk4-6-inhibitors.
6. Sultanbaev A.V., Fatikhov R.I., Gladkov O.A. et al. Drug therapy regimens for patients with hormone-dependent (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer in routine clinical practice (results of a noninterventional retrospective study). Meditsinskiy alfavit = Medical Alphabet 2022;(31):7–14. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33667/2078-5631-2022-31-7-14
7. Welt A., Thill M., Stickeler E. et al. What affects the choice of firstline treatment for hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer? Data from the German research platform OPAL. Ann Oncol 2020;31:S373, S374. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.426
8. Lu Y.S., Mahidin E.I.B.M., Azim H. et al. Final results of RIGHT Choice: Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy versus combination chemotherapy in premenopausal women with clinically aggressive hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2024;42(23):2812–21. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.24.00144
9. Cardoso F., Costa A., Senkus E. et al. 3rd ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 3). Ann Oncol 2017;28(1):16–33. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw544
10. A Prospective NIS to Evaluate the Clinical Outcomes of Risarg® (Ribociclib) Combined With Endocrine Therapy or Chemotherapy in Patients With HR+ HER2– aBC in Routine Clinical Practice in the Russia (ValerEE). Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06148506.
11. Zhukova L.G., Grechukhina K.S., Khatkova E.I. et al. Cross-sectional study of approaches to the treatment of luminal HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in real practice in Moscow. Zlokachestvennye opukholi = Malignant Tumors 2024;14(4): 37–49. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18027/2224-5057-2024-028
12. Brufsky A., Chen C., Mardekian J. et al. Characteristics of MBC patients receiving first-line treatments in the US real-word setting in the era of CDK4/6 inhibitors. Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):P1-19-26. DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS19-P1-19-26
13. Lewis K., Kurovsky S., Last M. et al. First -line treatment patterns in HR+/HER2– locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in Europe. Ann Oncol 2020;31(4):S371, S372. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.423
Review
For citations:
Zhukova L.G., Artamonova E.V., Vladimirova L.Yu., Vinogradova T.V., Voronkova L.M., Zhikhorev R.S., Leushina N.V., Mironov O.V., Reznikov V.А., Semenov E.V. Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with hormone-sensitive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer receiving ribociclib in combination with endocrine therapy or combination chemotherapy in routine clinical practice in the Russian Federation: interim results of the ValerEE study. Tumors of female reproductive system. 2025;21(3):33-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2025-21-3-33-49



































