Complications after reconstructive plastic surgery with the use of breast cancer implants

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The work is devoted to a review of the most common complications that develop after reconstructive plastic surgery using implants in patients with a history of breast cancer. Possible endogenous and exogenous trigger factors are described. In addition, a special role is assigned to the consideration of preventive measures that help minimize the risk of complications.

About the authors

E. M. Kungurtseva

State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation – A. I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Federal Medical and Biological Agency

Author for correspondence.
Email: em_kungurtseva@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-9350-8107

Ekaterina Mikhailovna Kungurtseva

23 Marshala Novikova St., Moscow 123098

Russian Federation

D. A. Ryabchikov

N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia

ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2670-2361

24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522

Russian Federation

N. V. Chanturia

N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia

ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7903-6417

24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522

Russian Federation

A. N. Khakimov

N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia

ORCID iD: 0009-0000-9663-0338

24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522

Russian Federation

T. T. Khaidarov

IQ Plastique LLC

ORCID iD: 0009-0004-6934-946X

20 / 1 Chasovaya St., Moscow 125315

Russian Federation

E. S. Makarov

N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia

ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0670-2770

24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522

Russian Federation

References

  1. Petrovskiy D.A., Vasilev A.A., Rybachkov V.V., Larichev A.B. Complications of reconstructive-plastic operations on the breast. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education 2012;(4):74. Available at: https://scienceeducation.ru/ru/article/view?id=6902 (In Russ.).
  2. Gui G.P.H., Tan S.М., Faliakou E.C. et al. Immediate breast reconstruction using biodimensional anatomical permanent expander implants: a prospective analysis of outcome and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surgery 2003;111(1):125–38. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000037752.95854.41
  3. Khokhlova O.V., Przhedetsky Yu.V., Zakharova N.A. et al. Complications of skin-preserving mastectomy with simultaneous alloplasty in breast cancer patients. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education 2015;(5):149. (In Russ.).
  4. Ivashkov V.Yu., Sobolevskii V.A. Case report: treatment of long persistent limforreya after radical mastectomy. Povolzhskii onkologicheskii vestnik = Volga Region Oncology Bulletin 2015;3:67–72. (In Russ.).
  5. Muzyakov V.V. Patent No. 2823462 C1. Russian Federation, МПК A61M 31/00, A61K 33/18, A61M 27/00. Method for conservative treatment of seromas in the early and late postoperative periods on the mammary gland: No. 2023133310: declared 14.12.2023: published 23.07.2024. (In Russ.).
  6. Ozturk C.N., Ozturk C., Magner W.J. et al. Seroma after breast reconstruction with tissue expanders: outcomes and management. Ann Plast Surg 2023;91(3):331–6. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003573
  7. Kamaletdinov I.F., Ismagilov A.Kh., Mizipova G.I. Possibilities for preventing seroma formation after axillary lymphatic dissection (literature review). Voprosy onkologii = Problems in Oncology 2020;66(6):625–9. (In Russ.). doi: 10.37469/0507-3758-2020-66-6-625-629
  8. Elbalshy M., Fayed A.M., Hagag M.G. Axillary space obliteration – an effective technique in reducing seroma formation after mastectomy and axillary dissection. Adv Breast Cancer Res 2018;7:23–32.
  9. Lee J.C., Teitelbaum J., Shajan J.K. et al. The effect of fibrin sealant on the prevention of seroma formation after postbariatric abdominoplasty. Canad J Plastic Surg 2012;20(3):178–80. doi: 10.1177/229255031202000317
  10. Ismagilov A.Kh., Kamaletdinov I.F., Mizipova G.I. Objective evaluation of intraoperative prevention methods for seroma formation after axillary lymphatic dissection. Voprosy onkologii = Problems in Oncology 2022;68(3):342–7. (In Russ.). doi: 10.37469/0507-3758-2022-68-3-342-347
  11. Phillips B.T., Bishawi M., Dagum A.B. et al. A systematic review of antibiotic use and infection in breast reconstruction: what is the evidence? Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;131(1):1–13. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182729c39
  12. Seng P., Bayle S., Alliez A. et al. The microbial epidemiology of breast implant infections in a regional referral centre for plastic and reconstructive surgery in the south of France. Int J Infect Dis 2015;35:62–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2015.04.010
  13. Szymankiewicz M., Nowikiewicz T., Biedka M. Significance of infections in implant loss after breast reconstruction in the course of breast cancer treatment. Pol J Microbiol 2019;68(3):343–51. doi: 10.33073/pjm-2019-037
  14. Ngaage L.M., Elegbede A., Brao K. et al. The efficacy of breast implant irrigant solutions: a comparative analysis using an in vitro model. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;146(2):301–8. doi: 10.1097/prs.0000000000007028
  15. Petrosyants S.V., Ivanov D.V. Capsular contracture after performing reconstructive plastic surgery in patients with breast cancer. Issledovaniya i praktika v meditsine = Research and Practical Medicine Journal 2024;11(4):111–26. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17709/2410-1893-2024-11-4-9
  16. Baker J.L., Bartels R.J., Douglas W.M. Closed compression techniques for rupturing a contracted capsule around a breast implant. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976;58:137–41.
  17. Ryabchikov D.A., Petrovsky A.V. Breast cancer: a guide for doctors. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2023. 400 p. (In Russ.).
  18. Hansen T.C., Woeller C.F., Lacy S.H. et al. Thy1 (CD90) expression is elevated in radiation-induced periprosthetic capsular contracture: implication for novel therapeutics. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;140(2):316–26. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003542
  19. Berestok T.S., Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D., Ermoshchenkova M.V. et al. Complications after simultaneous one-stage and two-stage reconstruction with implants in patients with breast cancer during combined/combination treatment. Onkologiya. Zhurnal im. P.A. Gertsena = P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology 2023;12(3):54–61. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/onkolog20231203154
  20. Sinnott C.J., Persing S.M., Pronovost M. et al. Impact of postmastectomy radiation therapy in prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 2018;2(10):2899–908. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6602-7
  21. Baichorov E.A., Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D., Ismagilov A.Kh. et al. Comparative analysis of the quality of life related to the health of breast cancer patients after simultaneous prepectoral reconstruction. Plasticheskaya khirurgiya i esteticheskaya meditsina = Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine 2022;(2):25–32. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/plast.hirurgia202202125
  22. Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D., Shirokikh I.M., Ablitsova N.V. et al. Simultaneous breast reconstruction and postoperative radiation therapy: development of capsular structure. Voprosy onkologii = Problems in Oncology 2019;(3):374–85. (In Russ.). doi: 10.37469/0507-3758-2019-65-3-374-385.3
  23. Montemurro P. Comparison of POLYTECH MESMO and Motiva Ergonomix breast implants with focus on displacement issues: a single surgeon’s experience with 329 patients. Aesthet Surg J 2024;44(9):948–56. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjae071
  24. Stepic N. Importance of adapting the surgical technique to the characteristics of the breast implant surface type. Aesthet Surg J 2024;44(12):934–35. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjae189
  25. Lardi A.M., Ho-Asjoe M., Junge K. et al. Capsular contracture in implant based breast reconstruction – the effect of porcine acellular dermal matrix. Gland Surg 2017;6(1):49–56. doi: 10.21037/gs.2017.01.02
  26. Wagner R.D., Braun T.L., Zhu H. et al. A systematic review of complications in prepectoral breast reconstruction. J Plastic Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019;72(7):1051–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.04.005
  27. Chen W., Lv X., Xu X. et al. Meta-analysis for psychological impact of breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2018;25:464–9. doi: 10.1007/s12282-018-0846-8
  28. Vlasova M.Yu., Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D., Reshetov I.V. et al. Complications after simultaneous prepectoral breast reconstruction using polyurethane-coated implants in patients with breast cancer. Opukholi zhenskoy reproduktivnoy systemy = Tumors of Female Reproductive System 2020;16(4):12–20. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17650/1994-4098-2020-16-4-12-20
  29. Wang Y., Tian J., Liu J. Suppressive effect of leukotriene antagonists on capsular contracture in patients who underwent breast surgery with prosthesis: a meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;145(4):901–11. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006629
  30. Khomidi U.I., Vlasova M.Yu., Saribekyan E.K. et al. Delayed aesthetic results of reconstructive surgeries with endoprosthetics performed for breast cancer. Sovremennaya onkologiya = Modern Oncology 2025;27(1):26–31. (In Russ.). doi: 10.26442/18151434.2025.1.202905
  31. Ehrl D., Heidekrueger P.I., Haas E.M. et al. Does cigarette smoking harm microsurgical free flap reconstruction? J Reconstr Microsurg 2018;34(7):492–8. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1639377
  32. Mills E., Eyawo O., Lockhart I. et al. Smoking cessation reduces postoperative complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med 2011;124(2):144–54. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.09.013
  33. Goel V., Shukla S., Raju K. et al. Revisiting Y-shaped closure technique to prevent the dog ear formation in women undergoing mastectomy. Indian J Surg Oncol 2018;10(1):95–7. doi: 10.1007/s13193-018-0848-1
  34. Hart A., Funderburk C.D., Chu C.K. et al. The impact of diabetes mellitus on wound healing in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2017;78(3):260–3. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000881

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 36991 от  21.07.2009.