MODERN CAPABILITIES OF BREAST PATHOLOGY DIAGNOSTICS

Every year more than 1 million new cases of breast cancer are being recorded worldwide. Choice of appropriate tactics of treatment depends on the timely diagnosis and correct assessment of the prevalence of cancer.

The algorithm of patient»s examination includes clinical examination, X-ray mammography and ultrasonic diagnosis of breast. However, this is not sufficient for a complete interpretation of the patient»s condition in case of non-palpable breast formations, ambiguous interpretation of imaging under structural changes, increased density of breast tissue, etc.

In this regard, the introduction of new technologies and their evaluation in terms of practicality is a logical and developing method of early diagnosis of breast pathology.

One of the methods that enables enhancing the information capability of ultrasonic diagnosis of breast is elastography. It allows for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant changes not only in the breast tissue, but also in the areas of regional lymph drainage.

Promising method of modern diagnostic breast care is digital mammography tomosynthesis. However, in spite of the first and very optimistic

data, this technique is still far from standard.

Complex diagnostics of breast pathology, in addition to clinical data and imaging results, are based on information obtained from biopsies. At the present stage core-biopsy is considered as the best way of verification, where the resulting material is subjected to immunohistochemical studies.

Thus, the spectrum of diagnostic capabilities is constantly expanding. Highly informative techniques included in the daily practice today enable clinicians to achieve optimal results in curing even greater number of patients.

1. Корженкова Г.П., Кочергина Н.В. Ком- плексная рентгено-сонографическая диаг- ностика заболеваний молочной железы. Практическое руководство. М.: ООО «Фирма “СТРОМ”», 2004. 128 с. [Korzhenkova G.P., Kochergina N.V. Integrated X-ray sonographic diagnosis of breast diseases. Practical Guide. Moscow: LLC "Firm "STROM", 2004. 128 p. (In Russ.)].

2. Рожкова Н.И., Меских Е.В. Рентгеноло- гическая и сонографическая семиотика до- брокачественных и злокачественных заболеваний молочной железы. Клиническая маммология. Тематический сборник. Под ред. В.П. Харченко, Н.И. Рожковой. 1-е изд. М.: ООО «Фирма “СТРОМ”», 2005. С. 97–138. [Rozhkova M.I., Meskikh E.V. Radiological and sonographic semiotics of benign and malignant breast diseases. Clinical breast care. Thematic collection. Ed. by V.P. Kharchenko, N.I. Rozhkova. 1st ed. Moscow: LLC "Firm "STROM", 2005. Pp. 97–138. (In Russ.)].

3. Синюкова Г.Т., Корженкова Г.П., Данзанова Т.Ю. Ультразвуковое исследова- ние молочной железы в онкологии. Практическое руководство. 1-е изд. М.: ООО «Фирма “СТРОМ”», 2007. 160с. [Sinyukova G.T., Korzhenkova G.P., Danzanova T.Yu. Ultrasonography in breast cancer. Practical Guide. 1st ed. Moscow: LLC "Firm "STROM", 2007. 160 p. (In Russ.)].

4. Понедельникова Н.В. Методы биопсии непальпируемых образований молочных желез в зависимости от рентгено-соногра- фических проявлений. Дис. … канд. мед. наук. М., 2011. [Ponedelnikova N.V. Methods of biopsy of non-palpable breast formations depending on the X-ray-sonographic manifestations. Thesis ... Ph.D. Med. Moscow, 2011. (In Russ.)].

5. Заболотская Н.В. Ультразвуковая диаг- ностика заболеваний молочных желез. Практическое руководство по ультразвуковой диагностике. Общая ультрразвуковая диагностика. Под ред В.В. Митькова. 2-е изд. М.: Видар, 2011. С. 563–606. [Zabolotskaya N.V. Ultrasonic diagnosis of breast diseases. A practical guide to ultrasonic diagnosis. General ultrasonic diagnosis. Ed. by V.V. Mitkov. 2nd ed. Moscow: Vidar, 2011. Pp. 563–606. (In Russ.)].

6. Orel S.G., Schnell M.D., Newman R.W. et al. MR imaging-guided localization and biopsy of breast lesions: initial experience. Radiology 1994;193(1):97–102.

7. Orel S.G., Rosen M., Mails C., Schnall M.D. MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted corе-needle breast biopsy: initial experience. Radiology 2006;238(1):54–61.

8. Garra B.S. Imaging and estimation of tissue elasticity by ultrasound. Ultrasound Q 2007;23(4)255–68.

9. http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ sonoelastografiya-novoe-slovo-v-diagnostike- raka-molochnoy-zhelezy#ixzz3GfxrRdiZ.

10. Митьков В.В., Чубарова К.А., Заболотская Н.В., Митькова М.Д. Возможности эластографии сдвиговой вол- ной в дифференциальной диагностике оча- говой формы злокачественных и доброка- чественных опухолей молочных желез. Ультразвуковая и функциональная диагно- стика 2013;6:27–38. [Mitkov V.V., Chubarova K.A., Zabolotskaya N.V., Mitkova M.D. The capabilities of rotation wave elastography in the differential diagnosis of focal forms of malignant and benign tumors of breast. Ultrazvukovaya i funktsionalnaya diagnostika = Ultrasonic and functional diagnostics 2013;6:27–38. (In Russ.)].

11. Frey H. Realtime elastography. A new ultrasound procedure for the reconstruction of tissue elasticity. Radiology 2003;43(10):850–5.

12. Itoh А., Ueno E., Tohno E. et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006;239(2):341–50.

13. Митьков В.В., Чубарова К.А., Заболотская Н.В., Митькова М.Д. Информативность ультразвуковой эластографии сдвиговой волной в диагностике рака молочной железы. Ультразвуковая и функциональная диагностика 2014;1:12–24. [Mitkov V.V., Chubarova K.A., Zabolotskaya N.V., Mitkova M.D. Information capacity of rotation wave elastography in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Ultrazvukovaya i funktsionalnaya diagnostika = Ultrasonic and functional diagnostics 2014;1:12–24. (In Russ.)].

14. Bai М., Du L., Gu J. et al Virtual touch tissue quantification using acoustic radiation force impulse technology: initial clinical experience with solid breast masses. J Ultrasound Med 2012;31(2):289–94.

15. http://vestnik.rncrr.ru/vestnik/v11/papers/ khokh_v11.htm.

16. Рожкова Н.И., Зубарев А.В., Запирова С.Б. Новая технология – соноэластография в маммологии. Медицинская визуализация 2010;4:89–99. [Rozhkova N.I., Zubarev A.V., Zapirova S.B. New technology – sonoelastography in breast care. Mеditsinskaya vizualizatsiya = Medical Imaging 2010;4:89–99. (In Russ.)].

17. Gheonea I.A., Donoiu L., Camen D. et al. Sonoelastography of breast lesions: a prospective study of 215 cases with histopathological correlation. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2011;52(4):1209–14.

18. Gheonea I.A., Stoica Z., Bondari S. Differential diagnosis of breast lesions using ultrasound elastography. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2011;21(4):301–5.

19. Лесько К.А. Лучевая диагностика забо- леваний молочной железы у женщин с ги- потиреозом. Дис. ... канд. мед. наук. М.,

20. [Lesko K.A. Radiological diagnosis of breast diseases in women with hypothyroidism. Thesis ... of candidate of medical sciences Moscow, 2014. (In Russ.)].

21. Varghese T. Quasi-static ultrasound elastography. Ultrasound Clin 2009;4(3): 323–38.

22. Weismann C., Mayr C., Egger H., Auer A. Breast sonography – 2D, 3D, 4D ultrasound or еlastography? Breast Care (Basel) 2011;6(2):98–103.

23. Cho N., Moon W.K., Park J.S. et al. Nonpalpable breast masses: evaluation by US elastography. Korean J Radiol 2008;9(2): 111–8.

24. Khokhlova E., Lukyanova E., Rozhkova N., Zubarev A. Real-time sonoelas-tography in differentiation of solid breast lesion. Abstracts from the 12th Congress of World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. J Ultrasound Med 2009;35(8):153.

25. D'Orsi C.J., Newell M.S. On the frontline of screening for breast cancer. Semin Oncol 2011;38(1):119–27.

26. Baker J.A., Lo J.Y. Breast tomosynthesis: state-of-the-art and review of the literature. Acad Radiol 2011;18(10):1298–310.

27. Bernardi D., Ciatto S., Pellegrini M. et al. Application of breast tomosynthesis in screening: incremental effect on mammography acquisition and reading time. Br J Radiol 2012;85(1020): 1174–8.

28. Bernardi D., Ciatto S., Pellegrini M. et al. Prospective study of breast tomosynthesis as a triage to assessment in screening. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012;133(1):267–71.

29. Reynolds A. Breast density and digital breast tomosynthesis. Radiol Technol 2013;85(1):63–82.

30. Thibault F., Dromain C., Breucq C. et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus mammography and breast ultrasound: a multireader performance study. Eur Radiol 2013;23(9):2441–9.

31. Рожкова Н.И., Мазо Л.М. Томосинтез в диагностике заболеваний молочной желе- зы. Бюллетень сибирской медицины 2012;5(прил). [Rozhkova N.I., Mazo L.M. Tomosynthesis in the diagnosis of breast disease. Bulleten' sibirskoy meditsiny = Bulletin of the Siberian Medicine 2012;5(Suppl). (In Russ.)].

32. http://www.radiology/today.net(archive)rt0613p26.

33. Stark A., Hulka B.S., Joens S. et al. Her-2/ neu amplification in benign breast disease and the risk of subeguent breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2000;18(2):267–76.

34. Page D.L. Schuyler P.A., Dupont W.D. et al. Atypical lobular hyperplasia as unilateral predictor of breast cancer risk: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2003;361(9352):125–9.

35. Shoker B.S., Jarvis C., Sibson D.R. et al. Oestrogen receptor expression in the normal and pre-cancerous breast. J Pathol 1999;188(3):237–44.

36. Shoker B.S., Jarvis S.C., Clarke R.B. et al. Estrogen receptor positive proliferating cells in the normal and precancerous breast. Am J Pathol 1999;155(6):1811–5.

37. O'Shaughnessy J.A. Ductal lavage: clinical utility and future promise. Surg Clin North Am 2003;83(4):753–69.

38. Page D.L., Dupont W.D. Anatomic markers of human premalignancy and risk of breast cancer. Cancer 1990;66(6 Suppl): 1326–35.

39. Глузман Д.Ф., Скляренко Л.М., Надгорная В.А., Крячок И.А. Диагностическая иммуноцитохимия опухолей. Киев: Морион, 2003. С. 28–31. [Gluzman D.F., Sklyarenko L.M., Nadgornaya V.A.,

40. Kryachok I.A. Diagnostic immunocytochemistry of tumors. Kiev: Morion, 2003, Pp. 28–31. (In Russ.)].

41. Волченко Н.Н., Савостикова М.В. Ат- лас цитологической и иммуноцитохимической диагностики опухолей. М.: Репро- центр, 2010. [Volchenko N.N., Savostikova M.V. Atlas of cytological and immunocytochemical diagnosis of tumors. Moscow: Reprocenter, 2010. (In Russ.)].

42. Савостикова М.В. Иммуноцитохимическое определение рецепторов эстрогена и прогестерона в клетках доброкачественных образований молочной железы. Онкогинекология 2013;3:48–54. [Savostikova M.V. Immunocytochemical identification of estrogen and progesterone receptors in benign cells of the breast. Onkoginekologiya = Oncogynecology 2013;3: 48–54. (In Russ.)].

43. Елеубаева Ж.Б. Внедрение иммуноцитохимии в диагностику опухолей молочной железы. Материалы 3-го конгресса работников лабораторной медицины. Алма-Аты, 2014. [Eleubaeva J.B. Introduction of immunocytochemistry in the diagnosis of breast tumors. Materials of the 3rd Congress of workers of medical laboratory. Alma-Ata, 2014. (In Russ.)].

44. Волченко Н.Н., Савостикова М.В. Воз- можности иммуноцитохимического ис- следования в предоперационной диагностике опухолей. Российский онкологический журнал 2006;5:22–7. [Volchenko N.N., Savostikova M.V. Opportunities of immunocytochemical studies in the preoperative diagnosis of tumors. Rossiyskiy oncologicheskiy zhurnal = Russian Journal of Oncology 2006;5:22–7. (In Russ.)].

45. Введение в молекулярную диагностику. Под ред. М.А. Пальцева. М., 2010. [Introduction to molecular diagnostics. Ed. by M.A. Paltsev. Moscow, 2010. (In Russ.)].