Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: literature data and in vitro studies
https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2015-11-3-61-66
Abstract
This paper analyzes large amounts of literature data on studies of the efficiency of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) for advanced ovarian cancer (OC), which is performed prior to standard surgery. Clinical trials have demonstrated that a NCT regimen followed by cytoreductive surgery is less effective than primary cytoreductive one; however, evidence for the benefit of NCT is lacking so far. The authors conducted investigations using the intraoperative material obtained from 17 patients with T3a–cNxM0 OC, who were divided for a comparative examination into 2 groups. Group 1 included OC patents who received NCT; Group 2 comprised OC patients who did not. The tumor cells obtained from the intraoperative material of both groups were able to generate a well-proliferating culture in in vitro experiments. The cultured OC cells were characterized, by analyzing cytological specimens and the functional activity of these cells. It was ascertained that 35 % of the cultured tumor cells from OC retained their resistance to the cytotoxic action of effector cells (autologous lymphocytes) at a target cell/effector cell ratio of 1:5. Thus, both the literature and the experiment provide no unambiguous evidence supporting the fact that NCT before cytoreductive surgery is a better approach than primary surgical treatment. The optimal regimen of NCT, which would be able to enhance its efficiency, remains important.
About the Authors
S. A. KuznetsovRussian Federation
I. Zh. Shubina
Russian Federation
L. T. Mamedova
Russian Federation
A. N. Gritsay
Russian Federation
R. Yu. Nasyrova
Russian Federation
M. V. Kiselevsky
Russian Federation
V. V. Kuznetsov
Russian Federation
References
1. Jemal A., Siegel R., Xu J., Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010;60(5):277–300.
2. Della Pepa C., Tonini G., Pisano C. et al. Ovarian cancer standard of care: are there real alternatives? Chin J Cancer 2015;34(1):17–27.
3. Winter W., Maxwell G., Tian C. et al. Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:3621–7.
4. Schwartz P. What is the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of ovarian cancer? Oncology (Williston Park) 2008;22:1118–25.
5. Fago-Olsen C., Ottesen B., Kehlet H. et al. Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy impair longterm survival for ovarian cancer patients? A nationwide Danish study. Gynecol Oncol 2014;132:292–8.
6. Vergote I., Trope C., Amant F. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;363: 943–53.
7. Kehoe S., Hook J., Nankivell M. et al. Chemotherapy of upfront surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: results from the MRC CHORUS trial. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:abstract 5500.
8. Stoeckle E., Bourdarias L., Guyon F. et al. Progress in survival outcomes in patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated by neo-adjuvant platinum/taxanebased chemotherapy and late interval debulking surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2014;21: 629–36.
9. Da Costa Miranda V., De Souza Fede A., Dos Anjos C. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with six cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced ovarian cancer patients unsuitable for primary surgery: safety and effectiveness. Gynecol Oncol 2014;132:287–91.
10. Vergote I., Amant F., Kristensen G. et al. Primary surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer 2011;47(Suppl 3):S88–92.
11. Cornelis S., Van Calster B., Amant F. et al. Role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer: survey results from the members of the European Society of Gynecological Oncology. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2012;22:407–16.
12. Vergote I., Du Bois A., Amant F. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: on what do we agree and disagree? Gynecol Oncol 2013;128:6–11.
13. Chi D., Musa F., Dao F. et al. An analysis of patients with bulky advanced stage ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma treated with primary debulking surgery (PDS) during an identical time period as the randomized EORTC-NCIC trial of PDS vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Gynecol Oncol 2012;124:10–4.
14. Hynninen J., Lavonius M., Oksa S. et al. Is perioperative visual estimation of intraabdominal tumor spread reliable in ovarian cancer surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Gynecol Oncol 2013;128: 229–32.
15. Le T., Williams K., Senterman M., et al. Histopathologic assessment of chemotherapy effects in epithelial ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and delayed primary surgical debulking. Gynecol Oncol 2007;106: 160–3.
16. Wang Y., Zheng W. Cytologic changes of ovarian epithelial cancer induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2013;6:2121–8.
17. Muraji M., Sudo T., Iwasaki S. et al. Histopathology predicts clinical outcome in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and debulking surgery. Gynecol Oncol 2013;131:531–4.
18. Matsuo K., Bond V., Im D. et al. Prediction of chemotherapy response with platinum and taxane in the advanced stage of ovarian and uterine carcinosarcoma: a clinical implication of in vitro drug resistance assay. Am J Clin Oncol 2010;33:358–63.
19. Chi D., Musa F., Dao F. et al. An analysis of patients with bulky advanced stage ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma treated with primary debulking surgery (PDS) during an identical time period as the randomized EORTC-NCIC trial of PDS vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Gynecol Oncol 2012;124:10–4.
20. Шубина И.Ж., Грицай А.Н., Мамедова Л.Т. и др. Характеристика субпопуляций лимфоцитов периферической крови и лимфатических узлов у больных раком яичников. Опухоли женской репродуктивной системы 2014;(3):58–63. [Shubina I.G., Gritsay А.N., Маmedovа L.Т. et al. Characteristics of sub-populations of peripheral blood lymphocytes and lymphatic nodes at patients with ovarian cancer. Opukholi zhenskoy reproduktivnoy sistemy = Tumors of Women’s Reproductive System 2014;(3): 58–63. (In Russ.)].
21. van der Burg M., van Lent M., Buyse M. et al. The effect of debulking surgery after induction chemotherapy on the prognosis in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecological Cancer Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. N Engl J Med 1995;332(10):629–34.
22. Vergote I., Trope C., Amant F. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;363:943–53.
Review
For citations:
Kuznetsov S.A., Shubina I.Zh., Mamedova L.T., Gritsay A.N., Nasyrova R.Yu., Kiselevsky M.V., Kuznetsov V.V. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: literature data and in vitro studies. Tumors of female reproductive system. 2015;11(3):61-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2015-11-3-61-66