Vacuum-assisted aspiration biopsy in mammology practice. Analysis of 3-year experience
https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2020-16-2-19-24
Abstract
Objective: to analyze the 3-year experience of vacuum-assisted aspiration biopsy under ultrasound guidance in patients with focal mammary neoplasms in categories BIRADS 2–5.
Materials and methods. The totals of 121 interventions were performed in 121 patients. In 9 (7.4 %) cases there were more than 1 node in the mammary gland.
Results. In 97.7 % cases the removed formations were benign. The breast cancer was detected in 5 (2.3 %) cases; there were cases of malignant tumors in each category according to the BIRADS scale. The complications were registered in 15 (12.3 %) cases and did not require surgical treatment. In 77 (63.3 %) cases the results of ultrasound monitoring were obtained in 6 months after the removal of formations, residual tissue was detected in 6 (4.9 %) patients.
Conclusions. The vacuum-assisted aspiration biopsy, thus, has a high diagnostic accuracy; the number of completely removed benign formations allows us to consider the method as an alternative to sectoral resection. It is worth saying that a high percentage of complications is associated with the stage of mastering the method; all complications were resolved conservatively.
About the Authors
S. S. Skurikhin
Saint Petersburg Clinical Hospital of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
72A Avenue Toreza, Saint Petersburg 194017
Russian Federation
72A Avenue Toreza, Saint Petersburg 194017
Yu. V. Suvorova
L.G. Sokolov Clinical Hospital No. 122, Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia
Russian Federation
4 Avenue Kultury, Saint Petersburg 194291
Russian Federation
4 Avenue Kultury, Saint Petersburg 194291
References
1. Malignant tumors in Russia in 2017 (incidence and mortality). Ed. by A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinskiy, G.V. Petrova. Moscow: P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – a branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia, 2018. 250 p. (In Russ.).
2. Papathemelis T., Heim S., Lux M.P. et al. Minimally invasive breast fibroadenoma excision using an ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy device. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 2017;2:176–81. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-100387.
3. Lakoma A., Kim E.S. Minimally invasive surgical management of benign breast lesions. Gland Surg 2014;2:142–8. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2014.04.01.
4. Karasev V.E., Dolgikh V.T., Reznikov A.S. Hormone therapy for the prevention of fibroadenoma recurrence of after vacuum-assisted aspiration biopsy. Sibirskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal = Siberian Medical Journal 2015;133(2):22–7. Available at: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/gormonoterapiya-kakprofilaktika-retsidivov-fibroadenomposlevakuumnoy-aspiratsii. (In Russ.).
5. Karasev V.E., Dolgikh V.T., Leonov O.V. Experience in vaccum-assisted aspiration removal of benign breast tumors. Sibirskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal = Siberian Medical Journal 2013;117(2):20–2. Available at: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/opytispolzovaniya-vakuumnogoaspiratsionnogo-udaleniyadobrokachestvennyh-novoobrazovaniymolochnoy-zhelezy. (In Russ.).
6. Ames V., Britton P. Stereotactically guided breast biopsy: a review. Insights Into Imaging 2011;2(2):171–6. DOI: 10.1007/s13244-010-0064-1.
7. Park H.L., Kim L.S. The current role of vacuum assisted breast biopsy system in breast disease. J Breast Cancer 2011;14(1):1–7. DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2011.14.1.1.
8. Zhang Y.J., Wei L., Li J. et al. Status quo and development trend of breast biopsy technology. Gland Surgery 2013;2(1):15–24. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2227684X.2013.02.01.
9. Burbank F. Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: improved accuracy with directional, vacuumassisted biopsy. Radiology 1997;202(3):843–7. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.202.3.9051043.
10. Levchenko K.F., Baranov A.I. Vacuum-assisted aspiration biopsy: minimally invasive treatment for benign breast tumors. A literature review. Opukholi zhenskoy reproduktivnoy sistemy = Tumors of Female Reproductive System 2018;14(2):36–41. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/1994-4098-2018-14-2-36-41.
11. Waldherr C., Berclaz G., Altermatt H.J. et al. Tomosynthesis-guided vacuumassisted breast biopsy: A feasibility study. Eur Radiol 2016;26(6):1582–9. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-4009-4.
12. Scharding S., Strobel K., Keulers A. et al. Safety and efficacy of magnetic resonanceguided vacuum-assisted large-volume breast biopsy (MR-guided VLAB). Invest Radiol 2017;52(3):186–93. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000331.
13. Skurikhin C.C., Suvorova Yu.V., Chagunava O.L. et al. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted aspiration biopsy of breast tumors: possibilities to optimize the technique. Diagnosticheskaya i interventsionnaya radiologiya = Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology 2018;12(4):33–8. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36949899. (In Russ.).
14. Hamilton L. Follow-up results after vacuum excision. Breast Cancer Rеs 2008;10(Suppl 3):P32. DOI: 10.1186/bcr2030.
15. Parkin С., Garewal S., Waugh S. Vacuum biopsy in the management of lobular in situ neoplasia: a single-centre experience. Breast Cancer Res 2013;15(Suppl 1):O2. DOI: 10.1186/bcr3499.
16. Rageth C., O’Flynn E., Comstock C. et al. First International Consensus Conference on lesions of uncertain malignant potential in the breast (B3 lesions). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016;159(2):203–13. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3935-4.
17. Loughran C.F., Keeling C.R. Seeding of tumor cells following breast biopsy: a literature review. Brit J Radiol 2011;84:869–74. DOI: 10.1259/bjr/77245199.
18. Maxwell A., Mataka G., Whiteside S. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted percutaneous excision of breast papillomas: results of long-term follow-up. Breast Cancer Res 2013;15(Suppl 1):P29. DOI: 10.1186/bcr3529.
Review
For citations:
Skurikhin S.S., Suvorova Yu.V. Vacuum-assisted aspiration biopsy in mammology practice. Analysis of 3-year experience. Tumors of female reproductive system. 2020;16(2):19-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2020-16-2-19-24
Views:
1124
Email this article 