Preview

Tumors of female reproductive system

Advanced search

Retrospective analysis of ultrasound criteria for newly diagnosed extragenital endometriosis detected during preventive examinations

https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2020-16-2-44-49

Abstract

Endometriosis is a common pathological condition characterized by the presence of endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterus, most frequently in the pelvis. Despite the ability to demonstrate infiltrative growth and tendency to local recurrence and invasion, endometriosis is considered as a benign proliferative disease. An increasing incidence of extragenital endometriosis (including that in young patients) and difficulties associated with its visualization during ultrasonography lead to a delayed diagnosis, resulting in an increase in the number of cases of advanced endometriosis, which requires long-term treatment. The improvement of a screening ultrasound tomography technique and development of specific ultrasound criteria for preventive examination will ensure rapid identification of patients requiring treatment. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 57 cases of extragenital endometriosis detected during preventive examinations of women between 2014 and 2019. Each case was analyzed with the consideration of ultrasound characteristics together with clinical and gynecological data. We evaluated location, size, contours, and structure of foci. We propose a method of extended ultrasound examination in women with suspected extragenital endometriosis.

About the Authors

O. E. Nechaeva
Federal Research and Clinical Center for Specialized Medical Care and Medical Technologies, Federal Medical and Biological Agency of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
28 Orekhovyy Boulevard, Moscow 115682


I. S. Gruzdev
A.V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
27 Bolshaya Serpukhovskaya St., Moscow 117997


Yu. V. Popov
Federal Research and Clinical Center for Specialized Medical Care and Medical Technologies, Federal Medical and Biological Agency of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
28 Orekhovyy Boulevard, Moscow 115682


A. G. Kedrova
Federal Research and Clinical Center for Specialized Medical Care and Medical Technologies, Federal Medical and Biological Agency of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
28 Orekhovyy Boulevard, Moscow 115682


V. N. Lesnyak
Federal Research and Clinical Center for Specialized Medical Care and Medical Technologies, Federal Medical and Biological Agency of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
28 Orekhovyy Boulevard, Moscow 115682


N. S. Nosenko
Federal Research and Clinical Center for Specialized Medical Care and Medical Technologies, Federal Medical and Biological Agency of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
28 Orekhovyy Boulevard, Moscow 115682


References

1. Vercellini P., Viganò P., Somigliana E., Fedele L. Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2013;10:5:261275.

2. Adamyan L. V., Kulakov V. I., Andreeva E. N. Endometrioses. Guidelines for doctors. 2 nd edn. Moscow, 2006. 411 p. (In Russ.).

3. Nezhat C., Li A., Falik R. et al. Bowel endometriosis: diagnosis and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;218:549–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.09.023.

4. Abrão M. S., Petraglia F., Falcone T. et al. Deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectosigmoid: Critical factors to consider before management. Hum Reprod Update 2015;21:329–39. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmv003.

5. Johnson N. P., Hummelshoj L., Adamson G.D. et al. World Endometriosis Society consensus on the classification of endometriosis. Hum Rep 2017;32(2):315–24. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew293.

6. Baskakov V. P., Tsvelev Yu. V., Kira E. F. Endometroid diseases. Saint Petersburg: Izdatelstvo N-L, 2002. 452 p. (In Russ.).

7. Walsh J.W., Taylor K.J., Rosenfield A.T. Gray scale ultrasonography in the diagnosis of endometriosis and adenomyosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1979;132(1):87–90. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.132.1.87.

8. Rodriguez R., Lopez-Carrasco A., Antolin E. et al. EP26.02: Ultrasound accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance image in deep infiltrating endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017;50(S1):381. DOI: 10.1002/uog.18745.

9. Demidov V. N., Zykin B. I. Ultrasound diagnosis in gynecology. Moscow: Meditsina, 1990. 224 p. (In Russ.).

10. Bazot M., Daraï E. Role of transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 2018;109(3):389–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.024.

11. Exacoustos C., de Felice G., Pizzo A. et al. Isolated ovarian endometrioma: a history between myth and reality. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2018;25(5):884–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.12.026.

12. Moore J., Copley S., Morris J. et al. A systematic review of the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;20(6):630–4. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469–0705.2002.00862.x.

13. Guerriero S., Ajossa S., Minguez J. A. et al. Accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of deep endometriosis in uterosacral ligaments, rectovaginal septum, vagina and bladder: systematic review and meta-analysis. Alcazar Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;46:534–45. DOI: 10.1002/uog.15667.

14. Endometriosis. Clinical guideline of the Ministry of Health of Russia. Moscow, 2016. (In Russ.).

15. Yarmoliskaya M. I., Aylamazyan E. K. Genital endometriosis. Different sides of the problem. Saint Petersburg: Eko-Vektor, 2017. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Nechaeva O.E., Gruzdev I.S., Popov Yu.V., Kedrova A.G., Lesnyak V.N., Nosenko N.S. Retrospective analysis of ultrasound criteria for newly diagnosed extragenital endometriosis detected during preventive examinations. Tumors of female reproductive system. 2020;16(2):44-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2020-16-2-44-49

Views: 594


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-4098 (Print)
ISSN 1999-8627 (Online)