CDK4/6 inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Choosing optimal therapy for estrogen-receptor-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: analysis of doctors’ preferences (“Prometheus”) in Russia – first results of the survey

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The emergence of a new class of drugs – inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 (CDK4/6) – has changed the paradigm of treatment of patients with luminal HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer. Their effectiveness is confirmed not only by randomized, but also observational studies on a wide heterogeneous population of patients from daily clinical practice; the use of these drugs in the 1st line is significantly expanding in the world. On the territory of the Russian Federation, an observational study of Prometheus was carried out, the purpose of which was to assess the frequency of prescribing CDK4/6 inhibitors, as well as other types of treatment in 1–2nd lines in real clinical practice in Russia, as well as factors and preferences of doctors influencing the choice of therapy. A survey of the target audience, whose answers can be considered reliable and reflecting today’s Russian clinical practice in the treatment of breast cancer, showed that, despite the fact that the overwhelming majority of doctors (78 %) believe that the maximum benefit from the appointment of CDK4/6 inhibitors is expected for the 1st line therapy, in real clinical practice, only 35 % of doctors practice 1 st line prescription. In the 2nd line of therapy, CDK4/6 inhibitors are prescribed by 45 % of experts, in the 3rd (or more) line – 20 %. According to the respondents, the main obstacle to the appointment of CDK4/6 inhibitors is the unresolved issues of the availability of therapy (44 %) and its cost (34 %). Among all the proposed clinical criteria, only the criterion “visceral metastases with impaired function of internal organs” influences the decision not to prescribe a combination of hormonal therapy and a CDK4/6 inhibitor in 1–2nd lines of therapy. Criteria such as ECOG status, menopause status, tumor subtype preceding chemotherapy, timing of progression do not determine the choice when deciding not to prescribe combination therapy.

About the authors

E. V. Artamonova

N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia; Department of Oncology and Radiation Therapy, N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia; Department of Oncology and Thoracic Surgery, M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute

Author for correspondence.
Email: artamonovae@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7728-9533
23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
1 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997
Build. 1, 61/2 Shchepkina St., Moscow 129110 Russian Federation

E. I. Kovalenko

N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia

ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4763-7992
23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478 Russian Federation

L. V. Bolotina

P.A. Hertzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia

ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4879-2687
3 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284 Russian Federation

M. B. Stenina

N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia

ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5304-9682
23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478 Russian Federation

R. V. Orlova

Saint-Petersburg State University; City Clinical Oncological Dispensary

ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4447-9458
7–9 Universitetskaya Naberezhnaya, Saint-Petersburg 199034
56 Veteranov Avenue, Saint-Petersburg 198255 Russian Federation

M. A. Mukhina

Pfizer Innovations LLC

ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5513-037X
10 Presnenskaya Naberezhnaya, Moscow 123112 Russian Federation

References

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2020



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 36991 от  21.07.2009.