CDK4/6 inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Choosing optimal therapy for estrogen-receptor-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: analysis of doctors’ preferences (“Prometheus”) in Russia – first results of the survey

The emergence of a new class of drugs – inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 (CDK4/6) – has changed the paradigm of treatment of patients with luminal HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer. Their effectiveness is confirmed not only by randomized, but also observational studies on a wide heterogeneous population of patients from daily clinical practice; the use of these drugs in the 1^st line is significantly expanding in the world. On the territory of the Russian Federation, an observational study of Prometheus was carried out, the purpose of which was to assess the frequency of prescribing CDK4/6 inhibitors, as well as other types of treatment in 1–2^nd lines in real clinical practice in Russia, as well as factors and preferences of doctors influencing the choice of therapy. A survey of the target audience, whose answers can be considered reliable and reflecting today’s Russian clinical practice in the treatment of breast cancer, showed that, despite the fact that the overwhelming majority of doctors (78 %) believe that the maximum benefit from the appointment of CDK4/6 inhibitors is expected for the 1^st line therapy, in real clinical practice, only 35 % of doctors practice 1 st line prescription. In the 2nd line of therapy, CDK4/6 inhibitors are prescribed by 45 % of experts, in the 3^rd (or more) line – 20 %. According to the respondents, the main obstacle to the appointment of CDK4/6 inhibitors is the unresolved issues of the availability of therapy (44 %) and its cost (34 %). Among all the proposed clinical criteria, only the criterion “visceral metastases with impaired function of internal organs” influences the decision not to prescribe a combination of hormonal therapy and a CDK4/6 inhibitor in 1–2^nd lines of therapy. Criteria such as ECOG status, menopause status, tumor subtype preceding chemotherapy, timing of progression do not determine the choice when deciding not to prescribe combination therapy.

metastatic breast cancer, CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib, Russian clinical practice

1. Cardoso F., Spence D., Mertz S. et al. Global analysis of advanced/metastatic breast cancer: decade report (20052015). Breast 2018;39:131–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.03.002.

2. Cardoso F., Sencus E., Costa A. et al. 4 th ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC4). Ann Oncol 2018;(29):1634–57.

3. Rugo H.S., Rumble R.B., Macrae E. et al. Endocrine therapy for hormone receptorpositive metastatic breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline. JCO 2016. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.1487.

4. Wilcken N., Hornbuckle J., Ghersi D. Chemotherapy alone versus endocrine therapy alone for metastatic breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;(2):CD002747. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002747.

5. Cardoso F., Costa A., Norton L. et al. ESO-ESMO 2 nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2). Ann Oncol 2014;25(10):1871–88.

6. Hirama T., Koeffler Н.Р. Role of the Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in the development of cancer. Blood 1995;86:841–54.

7. Fry D., Harvey P.J., Keller P.R. et al. Specific Inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 by PD 0332991 and associated antitumor activity in human tumor xenografts. Mol Cancer Ther 2004;3:1427–37.

8. Choi Y.J., Anders L. Signaling through cyclin D-dependent kinases. Oncogene 2014;33:1890–903. DOI: 10.1038/onc.2013.137.

9. The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2001. Available at: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/2001/.

10. Finn R.S., Dering J., Conklin D. et al. PD 0332991, a selective cyclin D kinase 4/6 inhibitor, preferentially inhibits proliferation of luminal estrogen receptorpositive human breast cancer cell lines in vitro. Breast Cancer Res 2009;11(5):R77. DOI: 10.1186/bcr2419.

11. Lamb R., Lehn S., Rogerson L. et al. Cell cycle regulators cyclin D1 and CDK4/6 have estrogen receptordependent divergent functions in breast cancer migration and stem cell-like activity. Cell Cycle 2013;12(15):2384–94. DOI: 10.4161/cc.25403.

12. Im S.A., Lu Y.S., Bardia A. et al. Overall Survival with Ribociclib plus Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 2019;381(4):307–16. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1903765.

13. Slamon D.J., Neven P., Chia S. et al. Overall survival with ribociclib plus fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2020;382(6):514–24. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911149.

14. Slamon D.J., Neven P., Chia S. et al. Phase III randomized study of ribociclib and fulvestrant in hormone receptorpositive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: MONALEESA-3. J Clin Oncol 2018;36(24):2465–72. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.9909.

15. Sledge G.W.Jr., Toi M., Neven P. et al. The effect of abemaciclib plus fulvestrant on overall survival in hormone receptorpositive, ERBB2-negative breast cancer that progressed on endocrine therapy MONARCH 2: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2019;6(1):116–24. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.4782.

16. Sledge G.W.Jr., Toi M., Neven P. et al. MONARCH 2: Abemaciclib in combination with fulvestrant in women with HR+/HER2– advanced breast cancer who had progressed while receiving endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol 2017;35(25):2875–84. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.7585.

17. Tripathy D., Im S.A., Colleoni M. et al. Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with hormonereceptor-positive, advanced breast cancer (MONALEESA-7): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2018;19(7):904–15. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30292-4.

18. Finn R.S., Martin M., Rugo H.S. et al. Palbociclib and letrozole in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2016;375(20):1925–36. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607303.

19. Rugo H.S., Finn R.S., Dieras V. et al. Palbociclib plus letrozole as first-line therapy in estrogen receptor-positive/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer with extended follow-up. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019;174(3):719–29. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-05125-4.

20. Johnston S., Martin M., Di Leo A. et al. MONARCH 3 final PFS: a randomized study of abemaciclib as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2019;5:5. DOI: 10.1038/s41523018-0097-z.

21. Cristofanilli M., Turner N.C., Bondarenko I. et al. Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptorpositive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2016;17(4):425–39. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00613-0.

22. Cardoso F., Paluch-Shimon S., Senkus E. et al. 5 th ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 5). Ann Oncol 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.09.010.

23. Giuliano M., Schettini F., Rognoni C. et al. Endocrine treatment versus chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2negative, metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and network metaanalysis. Lancet Oncol 2019;20(10):1360–9. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30420-6.

24. DeMichele A., Cristofanili M., Brufsky A. Overall survival for first-line palbociclib plus letrozole vs letrozole alone for HR+/ HER2– metastatic breast cancer patients in US real-world clinical practice. SABCS 2019. Poster P1-19-02.

25. Waller J., Mitra D., Mycock K. et al. Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients receiving palbociclib for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer in Argentina: The IRIS Study. J Glob Oncol 2019;5:JGO1800239. DOI: 10.1200/JGO.18.00239.

26. Taylor-Stokes G., Mitra D., Waller J. et al. Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients receiving palbociclib in combination with an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant for HR+/HER2-negative advanced/metastatic breast cancer in real-world settings in the US: Results from the IRIS study. Breast 2019;43:22–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.10.009.

27. Rocque G., Blum J.L., Montero A. et al. Quality of life in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer treated with palbociclib in realworld practice settings. San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 10–14, 2019. Abstract PD10-03.

28. De Laurentiis M., Harbeck N., Lawet E. et al. Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among women with HR+/HER2– advanced or metastatic breast cancer treated in real-world settings in Italy and Germany. San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 10–14, 2019. Poster P3-11-25.

29. Welt A., Thill M., Stickeler E. et al. What affects the choice of first-line treatment for hormone-receptorpositive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer? Data from the German research platform OPAL. Poster 342Р. Presented at: ESMO 2020. Ann Oncol 2020;S373–S374. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.426.

30. Howie L.J., Singh H., Bloomquist E. et al. Outcomes of older women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-negative metastatic breast cancer treated with a CDK4/6 inhibitor and an aromatase inhibitor: An FDA pooled analysis. J Clin Oncol 2019;36:3475–483. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.18.02217.

31. Robertson J.F.R., Bondarenko I.M., Trishkina E. et al. Fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole 1 mg for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (FALCON): an international, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2017;388:2997–3005.

32. Llombart-Cussac A., Pérez-García J.M., Bellet M. et al. PARSIFAL: A randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase II trial to evaluate palbociclib in combination with fulvestrant or letrozole in endocrine-sensitive patients with estrogen receptor (ER)+/HER2metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2020;38(15 Suppl):1007.