Therapeutic pathomorphism of malignancies: Clinical and morphological criteria. Classifications. Prognostic value of therapeutic pathomorphism in breast cancer and other tumors
https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2011-0-4-19-23
Abstract
About the Authors
A. A. LisayevaRussian Federation
Ya. V. Vishnevskaya
Russian Federation
E. M. Roshchin
Russian Federation
D. V. Komov
Russian Federation
I. V. Kolyadina
Russian Federation
References
1. Патологоанатомическая диагностика опухолей человека. Руководство в двух томах. Под ред. Н.А. Краевского, А.В. Смольянникова. М.: Медицина, 1993. Т1; с. 130–58.
2. Apple S.K., Suthar F. How do we measure a residual tumor size in histopathology (the gold standard) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Breast 2006;15(1):370–6.
3. Miller I.D., Payne S., Ogston K.N. A new gistological grading system to assess response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy. Int J Oncol 2002;20(4):791–6.
4. Chevallier B., Roche H., Olivier J.P. et al. Inflammatory breast cancer. Pilot study of intensive induction chemotherapy (FEC-HD) results in a high histologic response rate. Am J Clin Oncol 1993;16:223–8.
5. Sataloff D.M., Mason B.A., Prestipino A.J. et al. Pathologic response to induction chemotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the breast: a determinant of outcome. J Am Coll Surg 1995;180:297–306.
6. Penault-Llorca F., Abrial C., Raoelfils I. et al. Comparison of the prognostic significance of Chevallier and Sataloff's pathologic classifications after neoadjuvant chemotherapy of operable breast cancer.
7. Hum Pathol 2008;39:1221–8.
8. Honkoop A.H., Pinedo H.M., De Jong J.S. et al. Effects of chemotherapy on pathologic and biologic characteristics of locally advanced breast cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 1997; 107:211–8.
9. Burcombe R.J., Makris A., Richman P.I. et al. Evaluation of ER, PgR, Her-2 and Ki-67 as predictors of response to neoadjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2005;92(1):147–55.
10. Symmans W.F., Peintinger F., Hatzis C. et al. Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:4414–22.
11. Kaufmann M., Hortobagyi G.N., Goldhirsch A. et al. Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: an update. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:1940–9.
12. www.mdanderson.org/breastcancer_RCB
13. Fisher E.R., Wang J., Bryant J. Pathobiology of preoperative chemotherapy: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel (NSABP) protocol B-18. Cancer 2002;95:681–95.
14. Fisher B., Brown A., Mamounas E. et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local- regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:2483–93.
15. Огнерубов Н.А. Неоадъювантная терапия местно-распространенного рака молочной железы. Автореф. дис. ... д-ра мед. наук. М., 1992.
Review
For citations:
Lisayeva A.A., Vishnevskaya Ya.V., Roshchin E.M., Komov D.V., Kolyadina I.V. Therapeutic pathomorphism of malignancies: Clinical and morphological criteria. Classifications. Prognostic value of therapeutic pathomorphism in breast cancer and other tumors. Tumors of female reproductive system. 2011;(4):19-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2011-0-4-19-23