Preview

Tumors of female reproductive system

Advanced search

Subcutaneous mastectomy with nipple-areolar preservation: new feasibilities of surgical treatment in patients with breast cancer

https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2010-0-2-36-39

Abstract

The current surgical treatment strategy for breast cancer is to fulfill two tasks: a reliable cure for cancer and solution of esthetic problems. The former task is successfully solved by radical mastectomy whereas it is rather difficult to restore the breast because a specialist has to compensate for the whole volume of its tissue and to form a nipple-areolar complex (NAC) and a submammary fold. Subcutaneous mastectomy with and without NAC preservation optimally solves both tasks: its performance, by simultaneously maintaining the high level of radicalism, substantially makes primary breast repair easier and yields a better esthetic result.

About the Author

A. A. Volchenko
P.A. Herzen Moscow Research Institute of Oncological Studies, Russian Agency for Medical Technologies
Russian Federation


References

1. Toth B.A., Lappert P. Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning. Plastic Reconstruct Surg 1991;87:1048–53.

2. Newman L.A., Kuerere H.M., Hunt K.K. et al. Presentation, treatment, and outcome of local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 1998;5:620–6.

3. Simmons R.M., Fish S.K., Gayle L. et al. Local and distant recurrence rates in skin-sparing mastectomies compared with non- skin-sparing mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6:676–81.

4. Medina-Franco H., Vasconez L.O., Fix R.J. et al. Factor associated with local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2002;235:140–9.

5. Carlson G.W., Styblo T.M., Page A. et al. Local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy: tumor biology or surgical conservatism? Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:108–12.

6. Rusby J.E., Brachtel E.F., Taghian A. et al. Microscopic anatomy within the nipple:implications for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Am J Surg 2007;194:433–7.

7. Santini D., Taffurelli M., Gelli M.C. et al. Neoplastic involvement of nipple- areola complex in invasive breast cancer. Am J Surg 1989;158:399–403.

8. Laronga C., Kemp B., Robb G.L. et al. The incident of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6:609–13.

9. Simmons R.M., Brenann M., King V. et al. Analysis of nipple/areola involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:165–8.

10. Vlajcic Z., Zic R., Stanec S. et al. Nipple-areola complex preservation: predictive factors of neoplastic nipple- areola complex invasion. Ann Plastic Surg 2005;55:240–4.

11. Gerber B., Krause A., Reimer T. et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncollogically safe procedure. Ann Surg 2003;238:120–7.

12. Sacchini V., Pinotti J.A., Barros A.C. et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? J Am College Surg 2006;203:704–14.

13. Petit J.Y., Veronesi U., Luini A. et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy in association with intraoperative radiotherapy (ELIOT): a new type of mastectomy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treatm 2006;96:47–51.

14. Benediktsson K.P., Perbeck L. Survival in breast cancer after nipple sparing subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants: a prospective trial with thirteen years median follow-up in 216 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2007; 1–6.

15. Crow J.P. Jr, Kim J.A., Yetman R. et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy: technique and results of 54 procedures. Arch Surg 2004;139:148–502.

16. Psaila A., Pozzi M., Varanese A. et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: a short term analysis of our experience. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2006;25:309–12.

17. Bistoni G., Rulli A., Izzo L. Et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: preliminary results. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2006;25:495–7.

18. Jabor M.A., Shayani P.,Collins D.R. Jr et al. Nipple-areola reconstruction and clinical determinants. Plastic Reconstruct Surg 2002;110:457–63.

19. Захарков Л.И. Подкожные радикальные мастэктомии с первичной реконструкцией при лечении больных раком молочной железы. Автореф. дис. ... канд. мед. наук. М., 2006; с.95–7.

20. Moran M.S., Haffty B.G. Local- regional breast cancer recurrence: prognostic groups based on patterns of failure. Breast 2002;8:81–7.

21. Corderio P.G., Pusic A.L., Dissa J.J. et al. Irradiation after immediate tissue expanderimplant breast reconstruction: outcomes, complication, aesthetic results, and satisfaction among 156 patients. Plastic Reconstruct Surg 2004;113:877–81.


Review

For citations:


Volchenko A.A. Subcutaneous mastectomy with nipple-areolar preservation: new feasibilities of surgical treatment in patients with breast cancer. Tumors of female reproductive system. 2010;(2):36-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2010-0-2-36-39

Views: 966


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-4098 (Print)
ISSN 1999-8627 (Online)