Preview

Tumors of female reproductive system

Advanced search

A COMBINATION OF TAXOTERE, DOXORUBICIN, CYCLOPHOSPHOMIDE IN ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY OF OPERABLE BREAST CANCER GRANULOCYTE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTORS PRIMARY PROPHYLAXIS

https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2009-0-3-4-53-58

Abstract

The BCIRG 001 study has shown that a combination of Taxotere, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphomide (TAC regimen) is more effec- tive than the standard FAC (5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, cyclophosphomide) regimen in adjuvant chemotherapy of operable breast cancer (BC) with mestastases to regional lymph nodes. With higher efficacy, TAC regimen was more toxic: the incidence of febrile neu- tropenia was 24.7%. According to the current EORTC and ASCO guidelines, the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) for primary prophylaxis is indicated when the risk of febrile neutropenia is ≥20%. This study was designed to evaluate the safety of TAC regimen with G-CSF primary prophylaxis in adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) of BC .
Patients with operable BC (T1—3N1M0) and Karnofsky performance status 80% received adjuvant TAC regimen after radical surgery: Taxotere 75 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, and cyclophosphomide 500 mg/m2. G-CSFs were administered in the standard doses for 5—7 days starting from cycle 1 of CT, for primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia.
One hundred and one patients have been treated since 2006. Mean age was 47.5 years (range 25—67 years). Almost half (48.5%) of the patients had Stage IIIa disease, Stages IIa and IIb had 18.8 and 27.7% of patients, respectively.
The tumor was estrogen receptor-positive in 57.4% of the patients and progesterone receptor-positive in 62.4%. Overexpression of Her- 2/neu receptor was documented in 49.5% of cases. The mean number of cycles per patient was 5.8. Ninety-one (90.1%) patients have received a complete course of 6 TAC cycles. The duration of prophylactic use of lenograstim or filgrastim during one CT cycle was 5.9 and 5.6 days, respectively.
Episodes of febrile neutropenia were observed at 19 (3.2%) CT cycles in 9 (8.9%) patients. Neutropenic infections were recorded at 4 (0.78%) cycles in 3 (3%) patients.
Thus, the use of GCSF substantially reduces the incidence of TAC-associated febrile neutropenia and infectious complications and ensures a safe and complete course of effective adjuvant CT for the vast majority (90.1%) of patients. The data presented suggest that there is a need for primary prophylaxis with G-CSF in all BC patients receiving adjuvant TAC.

About the Authors

N. S. Besova
Deparment of Chemotherapy, N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
Russian Federation


V. A. Gorbunova
Department of Oncology, Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Russian Agency for Health Care, Moscow
Russian Federation


I. V. Poddubnaya
Department of Oncology, Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Russian Agency for Health Care, Moscow
Russian Federation


N. P. Makarenko
Department of Oncology, Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Russian Agency for Health Care, Moscow
Russian Federation


References

1. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Polychemotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 1998;352:30— 942.

2. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15- year survival: an overview of the ran- domised trials. Lancet 2005;365:1687— 717.

3. Roche H., Fumoleau P., Spielmann M. et al. Sequential adjuvant epirubicin- based and docetaxel chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer patients: the FNCLCC PACS 01 trial. J Clin Oncol 2006;24(36):5664—71.

4. Jones S., Holmes F., O'Shaughnessy J. Docetaxel with cyclophosphamide is associated with an overall survival benefit compared with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: 7-year follow-up of US Oncology Research Trial 9735. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(8):1177—83.

5. Martin M., Pienkowski T., Mackey J. et al. Adjuvant docetaxel for node-posi- tive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2302—13.

6. Perez E. TAC - a new standard in adjuvant therapy for breast cancer? N Engl J Med 2005;352:2346—8.

7. Bonadonna G., Valagussa P., Moliterni A. et al. Adjuvant cyclophos- phamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer: the results of 20 years of follow up. New Engl Med 1995;332:901—6.

8. Chirivella I., Bermejo B., Insa A. et al. Optimal delivery of anthracycline-based chemotherapy in adjuvant setting improves outcome of breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008;114(3):479—84.

9. Hryniuk W., Frei E., Wright F.A. et al. A single scale for comparing dose-inten- sity of all chemotherapy regimens in breast cancer: summation of dose intencity. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:3137—47.

10. Aapro M.S., Cameron D.A., Pettengel R. et al. EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febril neutropenia in adult patients with lymphomas and solid tumours. Eur J Cancer 2006;42:2433—53.

11. Martin M., Lluch A., Segur M.A. et al. Toxicity and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant docetaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (TAC) or 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (FAC): impact of adding primary prophylactic granulocyte- colonystimulating factor to the TAC regi- men. Ann Oncol 2006;17(8):1205—112. Von Minckwitz G., Blohmer J., Loehr A. et al. Pegfilgastrim alone or with ciproflax- in significantly reduces febrile neutropenia and hospitalization vs G-CSF alone in breast cancer patients receiving neoadju- vant chemotherapy with docetaxel/dox- orubicin/cyclophosphamide (TAC). Eur J Cancer 2006;4(Suppl 2):151—2.


Review

For citations:


Besova N.S., Gorbunova V.A., Poddubnaya I.V., Makarenko N.P. A COMBINATION OF TAXOTERE, DOXORUBICIN, CYCLOPHOSPHOMIDE IN ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY OF OPERABLE BREAST CANCER GRANULOCYTE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTORS PRIMARY PROPHYLAXIS. Tumors of female reproductive system. 2009;(3-4):53-58. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2009-0-3-4-53-58

Views: 982


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-4098 (Print)
ISSN 1999-8627 (Online)