The current pattern of reconstructive surgery for breast cancer

In Russia, breast cancer (BC) occupies a leading place in the pattern of cancers, the incidence of which is 20.9 %, among the female population; in 2013 there were 60,717 new cases, including women under the age of 40 years (15 %). While considering the history of the development of breast surgery from the operation performed by W. S. Halsted to its technique modified by J. L. Madden and the identification of sentinel lymph nodes, we can observe improved quality of life in patients in reference to the lower rate of the manifestation of lymphedemas. However, patients who have undergone this or that mastectomy are observed to have lower self-appraisal scores, a change in their professional sphere, irritability and apprehensiveness Thus, the decreased rate of the manifestation of lymphedema and obvious postoperative traumatization are not the only components of quality of life in patients with BC. According to the data obtained by E. Frank et al. (1978), G.P. Maguire et al. (1978), and F. Meerwein (1981), removal of the breast itself leads to a woman’s loss of femininity, attractiveness, and sexiness, which was also confirmed and reported by L. Aerts et al. (2014). In this connection, classical radical mastectomy begins to give way to organ-sparing treatment. Taking into account that psychotherapy and external prosthetics do not alleviate the above problems and that there are always women with established BC who have contraindications to organ-sparing treatment, breast reconstructive plastic operations arouse more and more interest. Reconstruction of the breast implies restoration of both its shape and contours to be maximally brought closer to its preoperative level. However, with regard to cancer alertness to breast reconstructive surgery, not only aesthetic requirements are imposed. The next step in improving quality of life in patients with BC was the emergence and development of breast-sparing mastectomies, the first point of these operations were skin-sparing radical mastectomies that were first described and performed by B. A. Tothu P. Lappert in 1991. In 1997 G. W. Carlson proposed to classify incisions for skin-sparing mastectomy successfully used to the present day. The investigation conducted by R. M. Simmons et al. (1999) indicated that skin-sparing mastectomy did not result in an increase in the incidence of local recurrences. The types of skin incisions, which were offered by G. W. Carlson in 1997 and used by R. M. Simmons in 1999, imply the preservation of the inframammary crease and a major portion of a skin graft, on the one hand, and the removal of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC), on the other hand, which in turn diminishes the final aesthetic result. B. Gerber et al. were the first to describe NAC preservation for BC. As regards the rate of local recurrences after NAC-sparing mastectomies, the vast majority of investigations performed in the past 10–15 years allude to the fact that NAC involvement is not more than 25 %. A. M. Munhoz in turn proposed a classification of incisions during NAC-saving mastectomies. In spite of all advantages of NAC-sparing mastectomies, their results are not always predictable. Main problems, such as wound healing difficulties or ischemic necrosis, are associated with the larger number of postoperative complications. Transfer of the patient’s own flaps does not always presume skin- or NAC-sparing mastectomy, as the possibility exists of preserving the skin on the most transferable flap. However, ruling out a patch symptom during subcutaneous or skin-sparing radical mastectomy considerably improves the aesthetic result of a performed operation. Taking into consideration that the incision types offered by G. W. Carlson and A. M. Munhoz depend on the site of a tumor, the surgical visibility problem is of relevance: visible postoperative scars, a difference in the skin texture, or restored NAC, all cause the women less satisfied. Thus, by achieving good results in restoring the contours, shape, volume, and symmetry of the breast, a visible postoperative scar is the only element that reveals a performed operation for BC.

1. International Agency for Research on Cancer GLOBOCAN 2012: Estimated Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide. Lyon: IARC, 2012.

2. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures. Atlanta, 2014.

3. Malvezzi M., Bertuccio P., Levi F. et al. European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2014. Ann Oncol 2014;25(8):1650–6.

4. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2013 году (заболеваемость и смертность). Под ред. А.Д. Каприна, В.В. Старинского, Г.В. Петровой. М., 2015. [Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2013 (morbidity and mortality). Ed. by А.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinsky, G.V. Petrova. Мoscow, 2015. (In Russ.)].

5. Семиглазов В.Ф. Лечение рака молочной железы. СПб., 1993. С. 39. [Semiglazov V.F. Treatment of the mammary gland cancer. Saint-Petersburg, 1993. P. 39. (In Russ.)].

6. Практическая маммология. Под ред. М.И. Давыдова, В.П. Летягина. М.: Практическая медицина, 2007. [Practical mammology. Ed. by М.I. Davydov, V.P. Letyagin. Мoscow: Prakticheskaya meditsina, 2007. (In Russ.)].

7. Krag D.N., Weaver D.L., Alex J.C., Fairbank J.T. Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe. Surg Oncol 1993;2(6):335–40.

8. Latalski M., Kulik T.B., Skórzyńska H., Zołnierczuk-Kieliszek D. Social consequences of breast cancer in women suffering from the disease. Wiad Lek 2001;54(7–8): 391–8.

9. Aerts L., Christiaens M.R., Enzlin P. еt al. Sexual functioning in women after mastectomy versus breast conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer: a prospective controlled study. Breast 2014;23(5):629–36.

10. Шушпанова О.В. Психические расстройства у больных раком молочной железы. Журнал неврологии и психиатрии 2011;(3):87–91. [Shushpanova О.V. Mental impairments at patients with ammary gland cancer. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii = Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry 2011;(3):87–91. (In Russ.)].

11. Mascaro A., Farina M., Gigli R. et al. Recent advances in the surgical care of breast. World J Surg Oncol 2010;8:5.

12. Fisher B., Anderson S., Bryant J. et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347(16): 1233–41.

13. Fentiman I.S. Long-term follow-up of the first breast conservation trial: Guy’ wide excision study. Breast 2000;9(1):5–8.

14. Urban C., Anselmi K.F., Kuroda F., Schwartz J.C. Oncoplasty as the standard of care in breast cancer surgery. Eur Оncol Нaematol 2014;1(10):43–7.

15. Блохин С.Н., Портной С.М., Лактионов К.П. Первичная реконструкция молочной железы при раке. Материалы 7-го Российского онкологического конгресса. М., 2003. С. 94–6. [Blokhin S.N., Portnoy S.М., Laktionov K.P. Initial reconstrcution of the mammary gland at cancer. Маterials of the 7th Russian Oncologic Congress. Мoscow, 2003. Pp. 94–6. (In Russ.)].

16. Исмагилов А.Х., Хасанов Р.Ш., Гимранов А.М. и др. Роль реконструктивно-пластических операций в хирургическом лечении больных раком молочной железы. Материалы IX Международного конгресса. Казань, 2009. С. 86–7. [Ismagilov А.Kh., Khasanov R.S., Gimranov А.М. et al. Role of reconstructive & plastic operations in the surgical treatment of patients with cancer of mammary gland. Маterials of the IX International Congress. Kazan, 2009. Pp. 86–7. (In Russ.)].

17. Salgarello M., Visconti G., Barone-Adesi L. Оne-stage immediate breast reconstruction with implants in conservative mastectomies breast reconstruction. In: Breast reconstruction, current techniques. Salgarello M. (ed.). Rijeka, Croatia: In-Tech, 2012. Рр. 49–82.

18. Zurrida S., Bassi F., Arnone P. The changing face ofmastectomy (from mutilation to aid to breast reconstruction). Int J Surg Oncol 2011;2011:980158.

19. Freeman B.S. Subcutaneous mastectomy for benign breast lesions with immediate or delayed prosthetic replacement. Plast Reconstr Surg 1962;30:670–82.

20. Snyderman R.K., Guthrie R.H. Reconstruction of the female breast following radical mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1971;47(6):565–7.

21. Toth B.A., Lappert P. Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 87(6):1048–53.

22. Carlson G.W., Bostwick J. 3rd, Styblo T.M. et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy. Oncologic and reconstructive considerations. Ann Surg 1997;225(5):570–5.

23. Carlson G.W. Technical advances in skin sparingmastectomy. Int J Surg Oncol 2011;2011:396901.

24. Kinoshita S., Kyoda S., Hirano A. et al. Clinical comparison of four types of skin incisions for skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Surg Today 2014;44(8):1470–5.

25. Farahat A.M., Hashim T., Soliman H.O. et al. Skin sparing mastectomy: Technique and suggested methods of reconstruction. J Egypti Natl Cancer Inst 2014;26(3):153–9.

26. Tokin С., Weiss A., Wang-Rodriguez J. Oncologic safety of skin-sparing and nipplesparingmastectomy: a discussion and review of the literature. Int J Surg Oncol 2012;2012:921821.

27. Blondeel P.N., Hijjawi J., Depypere H. et al. Shaping the breast inaesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: an easy threestep principle. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123(2):455–62.

28. Simmons R.M., Fish S.K., Gayle L. et al. Local and distant recurrence rates in skinsparing mastectomies compared with nonskin- sparing mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6(7):676–81.

29. Gerber B., Krause A., Reimer T. et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg 2003;238(1)120–7.

30. Simmons R.M., Brennan M, Christos P. et al. Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:165–8.

31. Laronga C., Kemp B., Johnston D. et al. The incidence of occult nipple–areola complex involvement in breastcancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6:609–13.

32. Cense H.A., Rutgers E.J., Lopes Cardozo M. et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a viable option? Eur J Surg Oncol 2001;27:521–6.

33. Paepke S., Schmid R., Fleckner S. et al. Subcutaneous mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola skin: broadening the indications. Ann Surg 2009;250(2):288–92.

34. Rusby J.E., Brachtel E.F., Othus M. et al. Development and validation of a model predictive of occult nipple involvement in women undergoing mastectomy. Br J Surg 2008;95:1356–61.

35. Sikand K., Lee A.H., Pinder S.E. et al. Sections of the nipple and quadrants in mastectomy specimens for carcinoma are of limited value. J Clin Pathol 2005;58:543–5.

36. Petit J.Y., Veronesi U., Orecchia R. et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in association with intra operative radiotherapy (ELIOT): A new type of mastectomy for breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006;96:47–51.

37. Voltura A.M., Tsangaris T.N., Rosson G.D. Nipple sparing mastectomy: critical assessment of 51 procedures and implicationsfor selection criteria. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15(12): 3396–401.

38. Wang J., Xiao X., Wang J. et al. Predictors of nipple-areolar complex involvement by breast carcinoma: histopathologic analysis of 787 consecutive therapeutic mastectomy specimens. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19: 1174–80.

39. Munhoz A.M., Montag E., Roberto J.F., Gemperli R. Immediate nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy reconstruction. World J Clin Oncol 2014;5(3):478–94.

40. Endara M., Chen D., Verma K. et al. Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review of the literature with pooled analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132:1043–54.

41. Stolier A.J., Sullivan S.K., Dellacroce F.J. Technical considerations in nipple-sparing mastectomy: 82 consecutive cases without necrosis. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15:1341–7.

42. Colwell A.S., Gadd M., Smith B.L., Austen W.G. An inferolateral approach to nipple-sparing mastectomy: optimizing mastectomy and reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2010;65:140–3.

43. Chung A.P., Sacchini V. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: where are we now? Surg Oncol 2008;17:261–6.

44. Garcia-Etienne C.A., Cody Iii H.S., Disa J.J. et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: initial experience at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and a comprehensive review of literature. Breast J 2009;15:440–9.

45. Wijayanayagam A., Kumar A.S., Foster R.D., Esserman L.J. Optimizing the total skinsparing mastectomy. Arch Surg 2008;143: 38–45.

46. Sahin I., Isik S., Alhan D. et al. Onestaged silicone implant breast reconstruction following bilateral nipple-sparing prophylactic mastectomy in patients at high-risk for reast cancer. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013;37: 303–11.

47. Rivolin A., Kubatzki F., Marocco F. et al. Nipple-areola complex sparing mastectomy with periareolar pexy for breast cancer patients with moderately ptotic breasts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012;65:296–303.

48. Regolo L., Ballardini B., Gallarotti E. et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy: an innovative skin incision for an alternative approach. Breast 2008;17:8–11.

49. Blechman K.M., Karp N.S., Levovitz C. et al. The lateral inframammary fold incision for nipple-sparing mastectomy: outcomes from over 50 immediate implant-based breast reconstructions. Breast J 2013;19:31–40.

50. Munhoz A.M., Aldrighi C.M., Montag E. et al. Clinical outcomes following nippleareola- sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction: a 12-year experience with an analysis of patient and breast-related factors for complications. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013;140:545–55.

51. Nava M.B., Cortinovis U., Ottolenghi J. et al. Skin-reducing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:603–10.

52. Petit J.Y., Veronesi U., Orecchia R. et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy with nipple areola intraoperative radiotherapy: one thousand and one cases of a five years experience at the European institute of oncology of Milan (EIO). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009;117: 333–8.

53. Spear S.L., Willey S.C., Feldman E.D. et al. Nipplesparing mastectomy for prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;128:1005–14.

54. Komorowski A.L., Zanini V., Regolo L. et al. Necrotic complications after nippleand areola-sparing mastectomy. World J Surg 2006;30:1410–3.

55. Wang F., Peled A.W., Garwood E. Total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an evolution of technique and assessment of outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2014;10(21):3223–30.

56. Bayat A., McGrouther D.A., Ferguson M.W. Skin scarring. BMJ 2003;7380(326):88–92.

57. Dixon J.M. Breast surgery. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2009. Р. 312.

58. Kraissl C.J. The selection of appropriate lines for elective surgical incisions. Plast Reconstr Surg 1951;8: 1–28.

59. Lowery J.C., Wilkins E.G., Kuzon W.M., Davis J.A. Evaluations of aesthetic results in breast reconstruction: an analysis of reliability. Ann Plast Surg 1996;6(36): 601–6.