DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF BREAST CANCER IN SITU. RUSSIAN ASSOCIATION OF ONCOLOGICAL MAMMOLOGY CLINICAL GUIDELINES (PROJECT)
https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2017-13-3-41-56
Abstract
One of the first and foremost tasks of the Russian Association of Oncological Mammology (RAOM) is to develop clinical guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer taking into account international experience. The guidelines must also be applicable in all regions of the Russian Federation allowing all Russian specialist to be informed about the latest strategies of diagnosis and treatment.
These clinical guidelines are based on the following consensus documents:
• St. Gallen Expert Panel (2011, 2013),
• Expert Panel of the IX International Conference “White Nights – 2012”,
• Expert Panel of the RAOM (2013),
• International consensus on treatment of metastatic breast cancer ABC 1,
• NCCN (2014) and ESMO (2011) practical guidelines,
as well as the results of large international randomized studies conducted in partnership with Russian oncological centers.
The guidelines take into account the results of the analysis of a cumulative database on breast cancer treatment methods performed at
• N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Oncology Center, Ministry of Health of Russia,
• Saint Petersburg City Clinical Oncological Dispensary.
Our guidelines are based on methods that are available everywhere in the Russian Federation, treatment schemes and drugs are presented in accordance with the marketing authorization of the Ministry of Health of Russia, drug therapy takes into account biological subtypes of breast cancer, different courses of the disease as well as nonuniform situation with drug availability in various regions of the Russian Federation.
Obviously, such materials cannot serve as a direct guide for action (every patient’s disease is different), but they can lend a helping hand to a doctor striving to treat patients according to the latest achievements of modern oncology.
All-Russian non-governmental organization Russian Association of Oncological Mammology. President of the RAOM, corresponding member of the RAS, Prof. V.F. Semiglazov; Vice-President of the RAOM, corresponding member of the RAS, Prof. G.M. Manikhas; Executive Director of the RAOM R.M. Paltuev, PhD.
About the Author
V. V. Semiglazov
Acad. I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University; N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Oncology Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
MD, member of the RAOM board.
6–8 L’va Tolstogo St., Saint Petersburg 197022; 68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyi Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758
References
1. Timbrell S., Al-Himdani S., Shaw O. et al. Comparison of local recurrence after simple and skin-sparing mastectomy performed in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. Ann Surg Oncol 2017;24:1071–6. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5673-6. PMID: 27837296.
2. Lagios M.D. Heterogeneity of duct carcinoma in situ (DCIS): relationship of grade and subtype analysis to local recurrence and risk of invasive transformation. Cancer Letters 1995;90(1):97–102. PMID: 7720048.
3. Silverstein M.J. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1997. P. 363–364.
4. Silverstein M.J. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Annu Rev Med 2000;51:17–32. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.med.51.1.17. PMID: 10774450.
5. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG): Correa C., McGale P., Taylor C. et al. Overview of the randomized trials of radiotherapyin ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010;41:162–77. DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq039. PMID: 20956824.
6. Van Zee K.J., Subhedar P., Olcese C. et al. Relationship between margin width and recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ: analysis of 2996 women treated with breast-conserving surgery for 30 years. Ann Surg 2015;262(4):623–31. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001454. PMID: 26366541.
7. Marinovich M.L., Azizi L., Macaskill P. et al. The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving therapy: A metaanalysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23(12):3811–21. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5446-2. PMID: 27527715.
8. Morrow M., Van Zee., Solin L. et al. Society of Surgical Oncology – American Society for Radiation Oncology – American Society of Clinical Oncology consensus Guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with wholebreast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol 2016;34(33):4040–6. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.3573. PMID: 27528719.
9. Guidi A.J., Connolly J.L., Harris J.R. et al. The relationship between shaved margin and inked margin status in breast excision specimens. Cancer 1997;79(8):1568–73.PMID: 9118040.
10. Kim K., Jung S.Y., Shin K.H. et al. Recurrence outcomes after omission of postoperative radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a multicenter, retrospective study in Korea (KROG 16-02). Cancer Res Treat 2017;162:77–83.DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.21.8560. PMID: 19826126.
11. Fisher E.R., Dignam J., Tan-Chiu E. et al. Pathologic findings from the national surgical adjuvant breast project (NSABP) eight-year update of Protocol B-17. Cancer 1999:86(3):429–38. PMID: 10430251.
12. Hughes L.L., Wang M., Page D.L. et al. Local excision alone without irradiation for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(32):5319–24. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.21.8560. PMID: 19826126.
13. Solin L.J., Gray R., Hughes L.L. et al. Surgical excision without radiation for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: 12-year results from the ECOG-ACRIN E5194 Study. J Clin Oncol 2015;33(33):3938–44. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.60.8588. PMID: 26371148.
14. Motwani S.B., Goyal S., Moran M.S. et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy: a comparison with ECOG Study 5194. Cancer 2011;117:1156–62. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25623. PMID: 21381008.
15. Goyal S., Vicini F., Beitsch D. et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery and accelerated partial breast irradiation: comparison of the Mammosite Registry trial with Intergroup Study E5194. Cancer 2011;117(6):1149–55. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25615. PMID: 21381007.
16. Fisher B., Dignam J., Wolmark N. et al. Tamoxifen in treatment of intraductal breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-24 randomized controlled trial. Lancet 1999;353(9169):1993–2000. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)05036-9. PMID: 10376613.
17. Wapnir I.L., Dignam J.J., Fisher B. et al. Long-term outcomes of invasive ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences after lumpectomy in NSABP B-17 and B-24 randomized clinical trials for DCIS. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011;103(6):478–88. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djr027. PMID: 21398619.
18. Houghton J., George W.D., Cuzick J. et al. Radiotherapy and tamoxifen in women with completely excised ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the UK, Australia and New Zealand: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2003;1362(9378): 95–102. PMID: 12867108.
19. Forbes J.F., Sestak I., Howell A. et al. IBIS-II investigators. Anastrozole versus tamoxifen for the prevention of locoregional and contralateral breast cancer in postmenopausal women with locally excised ductal carcinoma in situ (IBIS-II DCIS): a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2016;387(10021):866–73. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01129-0. PMID: 26686313.
20. Margolese R.G., Cecchini R.S., Julian T.B. et al. Anastrozole versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with ductal carcinoma in situ undergoing lumpectomy plusradiotherapy (NSABP B-35): a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial. Lancet 2016;387(10021): 849–56. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01168-X. PMID: 26686957.
21. Li C.I., Anderson B.O., Daling J.R. et al. Changing incidence of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002;75(3):259–68. PMID: 12353815.
22. Carder P.J., Shaaban A., Alizadeh Y. et al. Screen-detected pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (PLCIS): risk of concurrent invasive malignancy following a core biopsy diagnosis. Histopathology 2010;57(3):472–8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03634.x. PMID: 20727019.
23. Brown K. Breast cancer chemoprevention: risk-benefit effects of the antioestrogen tamoxifen. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2002;1(3):253–67. PMID: 12904141.
24. Chuba P.J., Hamre M.R., Yap J. et al. Bilateral risk for subsequent breast cancer after lobular carcinoma-in-situ: analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results data. J Clin Oncol 2005;23(24): 5534–41. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.038. PMID: 16110014.
25. Rosen P.P. Axillary lymph node metastases in patients with occult noninvasive breast carcinoma. Cancerи 1980;46(5):1289–306. PMID: 6260331.
26. Flanagan M.R., Rendi M.H., Calhoun K.E. et al. Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ: radiologic-pathologic features and clinical management. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22(13):4263–9. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4552-x. PMID: 25893410.
27. Fisher B., Constantino J.P, Wickerham D.L. et al. Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90(18):1371–88. PMID: 9747868.
Review
For citations:
Semiglazov V.V. DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF BREAST CANCER IN SITU. RUSSIAN ASSOCIATION OF ONCOLOGICAL MAMMOLOGY CLINICAL GUIDELINES (PROJECT). Tumors of female reproductive system. 2017;13(3):41-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2017-13-3-41-56
Views:
1098
Email this article 