BIOLOGICAL AND SYNTHETIC MATERIALS IN RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY FOR BREAST CANCER TREATMENT (LITERATURE REVIEW)

During the last years has been a worldwide trend towards rejuvenating breast cancer, and the evolution of reconstructive breast surgery is proceeding at a rapid pace. The surgical method is the primary method in the combined and complex treatment of breast cancer, and radical mastectomy is still the main option for surgical treatment in most Russian clinics. Most women who need a mastectomy prefer a one-stage breast reconstruction, because the woman is quickly rehabilitated psychologically and physically after this operation. Nevertheless, the use of silicone endoprostheses did not solve the problems of breast reconstruction in combined treatment in oncology. The issue remains unresolved of various complications, related not only to infections, but also to the development of capsular contracture after radiotherapy. Many patients with a one-stage breast reconstruction using a silicone endoprostheses lack the volume of their own tissues for reliable shelter of the endoprosthesis. In such cases, synthetic reticulated implants, biological implants or autologous flaps are used to cover and strengthen the lower slope of the reconstructed breast.

1. Malignant tumors in Russia in 2016 (morbidity and mortality). Eds.: A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinskiy, G.V. Petrova. Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena – filial FGBU “NMIRTS” Minzdrava Rossii, 2017. 250 p. (In Russ.).

2. Zakharkov L.I. Subcutaneous radical mastectomy with primary reconstruction in patients with breast cancer. Summary of thesis of candidate of medical sciences. Moscow, 2006. 113 p. (In Russ.).

3. Powers K.L., Phillips L.G. Breast reconstruction. In: Sabiston Textbook of Surgery: the Biological Basis of Modern Surgical Practice. Eds.: C.M.Jr. Townsend, R.D. Beauchamp, B.M. Evers, K.L. Mattox. 20th edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2017. Pp. 865–879.

4. Platt J., Baxter N., Zhong T. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer. CMAJ 2011;183(18):2109–16. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.110513.

5. Laktionov K.P., Blokhin S.N. Reconstructive surgery in breast cancer. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2008. Pp. 8–9. (In Russ.).

6. Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D., Ermoschenkova M.V., Efanov V.V. et al. Use of thoracodorsal flap in difficult cases of breast reconstruction. Issledovaniya i praktika v meditsine = Research and Practice in Medicine 2015;S1:72. (In Russ.).

7. Spiegel A.J., Butler C.E. Recurrence following treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111(2):706–11. DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000041440.12442.05.

8. Casella D., Bernini M., Bencini L. et al. TiLOOP® Bra mesh used for immediate breast reconstruction: comparison of retropectoral and subcutaneous implant placement in a prospective single-institution series. Eur J Plast Surg 2014;37(11):599–604. DOI: 10.1007/s00238-014-1001-1.

9. Dieterich M., Paepke S., Zwiefel K. et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP® Bra): a multicenter study of 231 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132(1):8e–19e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318290f8a0.

10. Pak D.D., Troshenkov E.A. Use of a mesh implant in combination with a silicone endoprosthesis in one-stage breast reconstruction after subcutaneous mastectomy. Rossiyskiy onkologicheskiy zhurnal = Russian Journal of Oncology 2012;2:13–7. (In Russ.).

11. Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D., Ermoschenkova M.V. Use of the titanian mesh implants in reconstructive surgery for breast cancer. Povolzhskiy onkologicheskiy vestnik = Oncology Bulletin of the Volga Region 2016;1:42–9. (In Russ.).

12. Kim T., Cho H. The suitability of absorbable mesh insertion for oncoplastic breast surgery in patients with breast cancer scheduled to be irradiated. J Breast Cancer 2013;16(1):84–9. DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2013.16.1.84.

13. Salzberg C.A. Nonexpansive immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular tissue matrix graft (AlloDerm). Ann Plast Surg 2006;57(1):1–5. DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000214873.13102.9f.

14. Forsberg C.G., Kelly D.A., Wood B.C. et al. Aesthetic outcomes of acellular dermal matrix in tissue expander/implantbased breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2014;72(6):S116–20. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000098.

15. Tessler O., Reish R.G., Maman D.Y. et al. Beyond biologics: absorbable mesh as a low-cost, low-complication sling for implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;133(2):90e–9e. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000437253.55457.63.

16. Logan Ellis H., Asaolu O., Nebo V., Kasem A. Biological and synthetic mesh use in breast reconstructive surgery: a literature review. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14:121. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-016-0874-9.

17. Becker H., Lind J.G., Hopkins E.G. Immediate implant-based prepectoral breast reconstruction using a vertical incision. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015;3(6):e412. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000384.

18. Becker S., Saint-Cyr M., Wong C. et al. AlloDerm versus DermaMatrix in immediate expander-based breast reconstruction: a preliminary comparison of complication profiles and material compliance. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123(1):1–6;discussion 107–8. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181904bff.

19. Bernini M., Calabrese C., Cecconi L. et al. Subcutaneous direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: surgical, functional and aesthetic results after long-term follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016;3(12):e574. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000533.

20. Gamboa-Bobadilla G.M. Implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg 2006;56(1):22–5. PMID: 16374090.

21. Hartzell T.L., Taghinia A.H., Chang J. et al. The use of human acellular dermal matrix for the correction of secondary deformities after breast augmentation: results and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126(5):1711–20. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ef900c.

22. Ibrahim A.M., Shuster M., Koolen P.G. et al. Analysis of the national surgical quality improvement program database in 19,100 patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132(5):1057–66. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a3beec.

23. Jacobs J.M., Salzberg C.A. Implant-based breast reconstruction with meshes and matrices: biological vs. synthetic. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2015;76(4):211–6. DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2015.76.4.211.

24. Moyer H.R., Pinell-White X., Losken A. The effect of radiation on acellular dermal matrix and capsule formation in breast reconstruction: clinical outcomes and histologic analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;133(2):214–21. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000437255.01199.42.

25. Vardanian A.J., Clayton J.L., Roostaeian J. et al. Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;128(5):403e–10e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b6637.

26. Nyame Т.T., Lemon K.P., Kolter R. et al. High-throughput assay for bacterial adhesion on acellular dermal matrices and synthetic surgical materials. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;128(5):1061–8. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b65af.

27. Salzberg C.A., Ashikari A.Y., Berry C. et al. Acellular dermal matrix–assisted direct-to-implant breast reconstruction and capsular contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;138(2):329–37. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002331.

28. Salibian A.A., Frey J.D., Choi M., et al. Subcutaneous implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix/ mesh: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016;4(11):e1139. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001139.

29. Berna G., Cawthorn S.J., Papaccio G., Balestrieri N. Evaluation of a novel breast reconstruction technique using the Braxon ® acellular dermal matrix: a new musclesparing breast reconstruction. ANZ J Surg 2017;87(6):493–8. DOI: 10.1111/ans.12849.

30. Reitsamer R., Peintinger F. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015;68(2):162–7. DOI: 10.1016/j. bjps.2014.10.012.

31. Casella D., Calabrese C., Bianchi S. et al. Subcutaneous tissue expander placement with synthetic titanium-coated mesh in breast reconstruction: long-term results. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016;3(12):e577. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000549.

32. Zhu L., Mohan A.T., Abdelsattar J.M. et al. Comparison of subcutaneous versus submuscular expander placement in the first stage of immediate breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016;69(4):e77–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.01.006.

33. Gschwantler-Kaulich D., Schrenk P., BjelicRadisic V. et al. Mesh versus acellular dermal matrix in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction – a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016;42(5):665–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.02.007. DOI: 10.17650/1994‑4098‑2018‑14‑1‑28-37