Efficacy of dose-intensive platinum-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the combination treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer
https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2018-14-4-56-64
Abstract
Objective: to assess the efficacy of dose-intensive platinum-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with FIGO stage IB2–IIB locally advanced cervical cancer.
Materials and methods. We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of 3 cycles of intravenous dose-intensive neoadjuvant chemotherapy with either AP regimen (cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 35 mg/m2) or TP regimen (cisplatin 60 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m2).
Results. The study included 105 patients (75 in the AP group and 30 in the TP group) aged between 27 and 63 years (mean age 44 years) with primary verified cervical cancer (T1–2B0–2Nx–0M0). Surgery was performed in 66 patients (88 %) from the AP group and 24 patients (80 %) from the TP group. Six patients (8 %) receiving AP regimen and 1 patient (3.3 %) receiving TP regimen developed disease progression. Four women (2.8 %) from the AP group developed relapses, whereas none of the patients from the TP group had relapses. Dose-intensive chemotherapy did not cause any significant complications at both chemotherapeutic and surgical stages. Our findings suggest that dose-intensive neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an effective method with an objective response rate of 84 % (63 cases) and 56.7 % (17 cases) in groups AP and TP respectively. Fifty-nine patients (78.7 %) receiving AP regimen had pathological response; of them, 7 participants (9.4 %) demonstrated pathological complete response (ypCR). In the TP group, 19 patients (63.3 %) had pathological response and 4 patients (13.4 %) had pathological complete response. Median follow-up time was 16.7 months (range: 3–29 months) in the AP group and 9.1 months (range: 2.8–12.7 months) in the TP group.
Conclusion. Dose-intensive neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be considered as an alternative to standard treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer; however, further studies are needed due to the small sample size in this study.
About the Authors
O. A. SmirnovaRussian Federation
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyi Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758
N. E. Bondarev
Russian Federation
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyi Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758
E. A. Ulrikh
Russian Federation
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyi Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758, 41 Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg 191015
N. A. Mikaya
Russian Federation
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyi Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758
A. S. Petrova
Russian Federation
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyi Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758
A. V. Abramova
Russian Federation
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyi Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758
A. O. Ivantsov
Russian Federation
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyi Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758
T. V. Gorodnova
Russian Federation
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyi Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758
E. A. Nekrasova
Russian Federation
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyi Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758
O. E. Lavrinovich
Russian Federation
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyi Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758
A. A. Sidoruk
Russian Federation
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyi Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758
A. F. Urmancheeva
Russian Federation
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyi Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758, 41 Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg 191015
I. V. Berlev
Russian Federation
68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyi Settlement, Saint Petersburg 197758, 41 Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg 191015
References
1. Torre L.A. Global Cancer Statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;0:1–31.
2. Malignant tumors in Russia in 2017 (morbidity and mortality). Eds.: A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinskiy, G.V. Petrova. Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena – filial FGBU “NMIRTS” Minzdrava Rossii, 2018. 250 p. (In Russ.).
3. Peters W.A., Liu P.Y., Barrett R.J. et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk earlystage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol 2000;18(8):1606–13. PMID: 10764420. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.8.1606.
4. Vazhenin A.V. Multicomponent treatment of advanced cervical cancer using induction polychemotherapy. Radiation therapy of cervical cancer. Chelyabinsk, 2002. P. 144–2002. (In Russ.).
5. Bokhman Ya.V. Gynecological oncology: a guideline. Leningrad: Meditsina, 1989. 463 p. (In Russ.).
6. Rydzewska L., Tierney J., Vale C.L., Symonds P.R. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery versus surgery for cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;12:CD007406. PMID: 23235641. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007406.pub3.
7. Saevets V.V. Multicomponent treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer according to the histological structure of the tumor. Zlokachestvennye opukholi = Malignant Tumors 2014;3:40–5. (In Russ.).
8. Churuksaeva O.N., Kolomiets L.A. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Sibirskiy onkologicheskiy zhurnal = Siberian Journal of Oncology 2013;2(56):18–24. (In Russ.).
9. Vashakmadze S.L. Ultrasound diagnostics in assessing the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Summary of thesis … of candidate of medical sciences. Moscow, 2016. (In Russ.).
10. Thigpen T. Cisplatinum in treatment of advanced or recurrent sguamons cell carcinoma of the cervix. A phase II study of the Gynecologie Oncologie Group. Cancer 1981;48:899–903.
11. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 21 randomised trials. Eur J Cancer 2003;39(17):2470–86. PMID: 14602133.
12. Dueñas-Gonzalez A., López-Graniel C., González-Enciso A. et al. А phase II study of multimodality treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer: neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by radical hysterectomy and adjuvant cisplatin chemoradiation. Ann Oncol 2003;14(8):1278–84. PMID: 12881393.
13. Vizza E., Pellegrino A., Milani R. et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced stage IB2–IIB cervical cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2011;37(4):364–9. PMID: 21194881. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.12.001.
14. Sardi J., Sananes C., Giaroli A. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Gynecol Oncol 1990;38(3):486–93. PMID: 1699851.
15. Esserman L.J., Woodcock J. Accelerating identification and regulatory approval of investigational cancer drugs. JAMA 2011;306(23):2608–9. PMID: 22187281. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.1837.
16. Gupta S., Maheshwari A., Parab P. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery versus concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with stage IB2, IIA, or IIB squamous cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2018;36(16):1548–55. PMID: 29432076. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.9985.
17. Robova H., Rob L., Halaska MJ. et al. High-dose density neoadjuvant chemotherapy in bulky IB cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2013;128(1):49–53. PMID: 23063763. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.10.002.
18. Park D.C., Kim J.H., Lew Y.O. et al. Phase II trial of neoadjuvant paclitaxel and cisplatin in uterine cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004;92(1):59–63. PMID: 14751139.
19. Park D.C., Suh M.J., Yeo S.G. Neoadjuvant paclitaxel and cisplatin in uterine cervical cancer: long-term results. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009;19(5):943–7. PMID: 19574789. DOI: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a23c2e.
Review
For citations:
Smirnova O.A., Bondarev N.E., Ulrikh E.A., Mikaya N.A., Petrova A.S., Abramova A.V., Ivantsov A.O., Gorodnova T.V., Nekrasova E.A., Lavrinovich O.E., Sidoruk A.A., Urmancheeva A.F., Berlev I.V. Efficacy of dose-intensive platinum-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the combination treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. Tumors of female reproductive system. 2018;14(4):56-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2018-14-4-56-64